Record Details
page 18
Digital Collections at BYU
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Title | page 18 Final supplement to the final environmental impact statement : Diamond Fork System, Bonneville Unit, Central Utah Project, page 18 |
| Coverage | Electronic reproduction; |
| Format | 18 text/PDF |
| Rights | Brigham Young University; http://lib.byu.edu/about/copyright/generic.php Public Domain Public |
| Language | English; eng; en |
| Relation | Central Utah Project; Western Waters Digital Library; CHAPTER II 11 alternatives construction camps processing facilities and equipment yards would be located a minimum of 1 mile from any active nesting site b designing power transmission lines and towers to prevent electrocution of eagles and placing the lines and towers in such locations to minimize exposure of perched eagles and other raptors raptores to indiscriminate shooting by undisciplined individuals c protecting rocky cliff areas immediately north of monks hollow which are important in providing preferred denning and hunting habitat for bobcat from unnecessary habitat destruction or alteration d restricting public access especially snowmobiles snowmobiler snow mobiles during the winter period from december through mid april to project roads on severe winter range for mule deer this would be done in accordance with the current uinta national forest travel plan e controlling excessive construction activities and noise in deer wintering areas whenever possible f avoiding construction impacts in riparian zones to the extent possible and reestablishing riparian habitat where construction activities occurred g scheduling major operation and maintenance activities to avoid golden eagle breeding and nesting periods and big game winter use 4 use helicopter construction methods to construct power transmission facilities in locations not accessible by existing roads and trails this would include spanning canyons with transmission lines whenever possible to avoid impacts to vulnerable riparian habitats offsite off site option this is reclamations preferred option it differs from both the mitigation program described in the 1984 FES and the onsite ansite option in that it provides compensation measures primarily in areas remote from the project activity the offsite option considers the acquisition protection and management of up to 572 acres of additional private lands as well as habitat improvements andor management of up to 5428 acres of federal lands administered by reclamation and the forest service of the 6000 acres under consideration about 4100 acres would be required to fully mitigate project impacts resulting from the recommended plan all of the lands are located in utah wasatch wasatc 11 and duchesne counties see the following map this plan has 18 |
| Identifier | http://cdm15999.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/WesternWatersProject/id/13063 |
