Record Details
page 229
Digital Collections at BYU
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Title | page 229 Final supplement to the final environmental impact statement : Diamond Fork System, Bonneville Unit, Central Utah Project, page 229 |
| Coverage | Electronic reproduction; |
| Format | 229 text/PDF |
| Rights | Brigham Young University; http://lib.byu.edu/about/copyright/generic.php Public Domain Public |
| Language | English; eng; en |
| Relation | Central Utah Project; Western Waters Digital Library; 4 intermountain water alliance specific comments page 5 page 90 please list the species of toads and frogs which are common to the area and when and how was this com commoness comrnoness commoners moness determined page 6 and 7 and throughout the report supplemental irrigation what is the cost of this water per acre foot and can the agricultural community afford this water what happens in wet years when this water is not needed the entire report it seems that most of the impacts and benefits of alternative A and B are deferred to the irrigation and drainage component analysis this leaves only one alternative C which is discussed if alternative A and B are not selected then what needs does the bureau of reclamation have for power where and how will this power be used who will operate the joint power plant and willthis will this joint operation be paid page 1011 10 11 what if pacific corp or some other shareholder share holder owned utility wish to build the power plant page 13 would the electricity generation be managed by western area power administration what is the difference between operate the power pover plant and control the power plant page 15 page 19 off site or on site miti mitigation gation gatton options will not compensate fully for lossesof losse losses tosse sof soy of all indicator species as well as other affected wildlife s species and their habitats this stat statement emeit in the draft is absolute nonsense unless a thorough biological survey is performed beaver do not indicate any aquatic species that exists in springs and flowing waters just where are the aquatic areas which will be impacted what about the springs in lower diamond fork found in the ribboned ribboner rib boned s section of the river will these springs be affected and how will win wiil wio the impacts impact s be mitigated page 19 off site mitigation proposed just because the bureau of reclamation already owns90 owns 90 of theland the land is an absurb absorb reason for off site mitination mitigation miti nation diversity of habitats as well as locations in different area is a far morosound more moro nore nora sound principle of wildlife conservation and enhancement enhancementpractices practices instead of putting all eggs ina in a bottomless basket page 27 where would the bedload material be deposited after removal from the reservoir page pane 35 with the large fluctuation of monks hollow reservoir and during the summer recreational period will this reservoir support a standing crop of 17 lbs IDS per acre of fish P 39 where is the locationof location of the 28 acres which will be temporary lost and the 23 to 44 acres which will be permanently lost will the diamond fork road require widening and hence destroy the adjacent springs P 41 streams need floods to maintain stream beds controlling floods ultimately destroys stream beds 221 229 9 3 |
| Identifier | http://cdm15999.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/WesternWatersProject/id/13031 |
