Record Details
page 223
Digital Collections at BYU
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Title | page 223 Final supplement to the final environmental impact statement : Diamond Fork System, Bonneville Unit, Central Utah Project, page 223 |
| Coverage | Electronic reproduction; |
| Format | 223 text/PDF |
| Rights | Brigham Young University; http://lib.byu.edu/about/copyright/generic.php Public Domain Public |
| Language | English; eng; en |
| Relation | Central Utah Project; Western Waters Digital Library; iann ipnn r jj r j L jy cen centralwah Central tra utah Wah wab B water s conservancy district S tric ft roscoe garrelt garreft Gar remt reft pfosdent 355 WEST 1300 SOUTH OREM UTAH 84058 teth leo L erady ISZS vice pros Pres presmont presdont wont dont TELEPHONE 801 2267100 226 7100 don A chrtanw chrisbanw secreteryl Secre swynwuw teryl ttsufor Y june 29 1989 BOARD OF DIRECTORS delora dellora bertelsen Bert elsen elsan eisen leo L brady J merrill bushnell R roscoe garrett harley ma M m1 gillman tom hatch robert B hilbert george holmes richard T holzworth leroy W hooten jr gerald K maloney rondal mckee kent R peatross david rasmussen rasmu33en ras Rai mussen nick P sefakis roger walker melvin 8 whitd whita chita david L wilson boyd workman jill J L 1c3 ZSD regional environmental officer u bureau of reclamation 125 south state street PO box 11568 salt lake city utah 84147 dear sir this district has reviewed the draft supplement to the final environmental impact statement diamond fork system bonneville unit central utah project and offer the following comments general comments the subject document is described as a draft supplement to the final environmental impact statement for the diamond fork system whereas the original wording was the final environmental impact statement for the diamond fork power system wj note that the word power has been dropped the cover sheet states that this supplement describes the environmental impacts of reducing the size of the diamond fork power system plan since publication of the final environmental statement INTFES INT FES 8430 84 30 the alternatives presented do not evaluate the difference in score scope scop Q of power development but evaluate alternative uses of water keeping the power system essentially the same alternatives A & B would deliver water to both the municipal and industrial system and the irrigation and drainage system while alternative C corresponds to no action alternative for the ild system the central utah water conservancy district therefore brings to the attention of the bureau that this supplement cannot be a supplement to the final impact statement of the diamond fork power system because 1 the scope of the document has changed to something different than a power system EIS as originally described in the 1973 bonneville unit EIS and the diamond fork power system final environmental impact statement 2 the alternatives presented in the draft statement have nothing to do with evaluating differences in the diamond fork power system 3 the document inaccurately and incompletely describes the alternatives presented 223 W au 3u |
| Identifier | http://cdm15999.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/WesternWatersProject/id/13021 |
