Record Details
page 168
Digital Collections at BYU
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Title | page 168 Final supplement to the final environmental impact statement : Diamond Fork System, Bonneville Unit, Central Utah Project, page 168 |
| Coverage | Electronic reproduction; |
| Format | 168 text/PDF |
| Rights | Brigham Young University; http://lib.byu.edu/about/copyright/generic.php Public Domain Public |
| Language | English; eng; en |
| Relation | Central Utah Project; Western Waters Digital Library; CHAPTER IV consultation AND coordination letter from strawberry water users association dated june 28 1989 WRITTEN COMMENT 108 purpose of the diamond fork system pages 1 2 on page 2 the last sentence in the first paragraph should read the potential also would exist for further hydroelectric development by other nonfederal non federal funding to specifically provide for nonfederal non federal funding the hydroelectric development RESPONSE 108 the sentence has been revised to state that the potential would also exist for further hydroelectric development to be financed by nonfederal non federal entitiesc entities entitles WRITTEN COMMENT CONNENT 109 strawberry valley project pages 2 3 on page 2 the first sentence of the first full paragraph should read the strawberry valley project is a forerunner of the central utah project since the phrase completed in 1922 192211 is inaccurate RESPONSE 109 the sentence has been revised as suggested WRITTEN COMMENT COMMT 110 location and setting pages 4 5 the first sentence cf 0 the last paragraph on page 5 should add the cities of mapleton elk ridge and woodland hills and the population 2b374 112b37411 should be adjusted accordingly currently approximately 42000 114200011 RESPONSE RZSPCNSE 110 the sentence has been revised to indicate a population of 35572 based on the 1980 census WRITTEN MITTEN COMMENT COMMMT 111 syar tunnel page 9 it is noted on page 9 under syar tunnel that a 50 cfs cs bypass by pass valve will be installed in the tunnel to diver flows to the existing strawberry tunnel to provide a capability for maintaining a fishery in sixth water reek creek the draft supplemental does not discuss or evaluate the impacts from such diversion on the power generation of the diamond fork system it appears that such bypass diversion would constitute major federal action which would require a further environmental impact study so that all impacts on the diamond fork rork system are disclosed in accordance withthe with the law RESPONSE 111 see the responses to ritten written i comment 6 an anu 7 WRITTEN COMMENT COMMNT 112 table 1 p 10 footnotes 1 and 2 under table 1 should be changed from nonfederal non federal development to nonfederal funding to be consistent throughout the draft supplement RESPONSE 112 the footnotes have been revised to be consistent with the response to written comment 108 168 1 t U BEST COPY AVAILABLE |
| Identifier | http://cdm15999.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/WesternWatersProject/id/13012 |
