Record Details
page 129
Digital Collections at BYU
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Title | page 129 Final supplement to the final environmental impact statement : Diamond Fork System, Bonneville Unit, Central Utah Project, page 129 |
| Coverage | Electronic reproduction; |
| Format | 129 text/PDF |
| Rights | Brigham Young University; http://lib.byu.edu/about/copyright/generic.php Public Domain Public |
| Language | English; eng; en |
| Relation | Central Utah Project; Western Waters Digital Library; CHAPTER IV consultation AND coordination releases above natural levels during the winter would represent fishery enhancement above levels projected in the draft supplement WRITTZN MRZTTKN COMMENT 9 we do not concur that the fifth water trailhead and loop trail system in the fifth and sixth water drainage should be deleted the three forks area in diamond fork presently serves as a trailhead for three extremely popular drainages for hiking and horseback riding on the spanish fork ranger district they are the fifth water sixth water and cottonwood drainages with the construction of monks hollow dam the only access to these drainages would be from the upper ends of the fifth and sixth water drainages where no access facilities vill be available or the monks hollow recreation area which is a five mile hike or horseback ride around the reservoir rzspcpqsz rx8pchsk 9 this document is not the proper forum to discuss changes in the project recreation plan reclamat Rec reclamation lamat on will consider this proposed modification to the recreation plan and pursue it with the forest service in further discussions letter from yish fish yih and wildlife service utah colorado field office dated july 5 1989 KRITTXN INRITTIN COMMENT CONMT 10 in general we find that the subject document accurately describes impacts of the three evaluated alternatives and plans considered in the 1984 final environmental impact statement INTFES INT FES 8430 84 30 on fish and wildlife resources within the diamond fork drainage the document however does not contain evaluations of the impacts of alternatives A and B on the resources of strawberry reservoir utah lake the jordan river and utah valley streams the document proposes that these impacts be addressed in another environmental impact statement for the irrigation and drainage lad led iad i&d system we believe that the subject document is adequate in regard to alternative C which assumes that the system would not constructed however an overall comparison with alternatives A and B ill will necessitate evaluations of impacts outside the diamond fork drainage PZSPCNSZ BESPOHSK 10 this document discusses the impacts of the diamond fork water conveyance system A completeevaluation complete evaluation and comparison of impacts associated with the lad iad system on the resources of strawberry reservoir utah lake the jordan river and utah valley streams will be included in a separate environmental statement sitatemerat for the iad i&d system of the bonneville unit as necessary WRITTZN VEKVKTSEK commit COMMENT 11 lother I 1 other concern that we have about alternative A is the impacts it would have on stream fisheries in the uinta basin alternative A assumes that sources of water to meet fisheries goals stated in the 1980 streamflow Stream flow agreement that do not require a reduction in the transbasin trans basin diversion will be found we do not believe that there are feasible means for 129 13 19 |
| Identifier | http://cdm15999.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/WesternWatersProject/id/13004 |
