Record Details

page 89

Digital Collections at BYU

Field Value
Title page 89 Final supplement to the final environmental impact statement : Diamond Fork System, Bonneville Unit, Central Utah Project, page 89
Coverage Electronic reproduction;
Format 89 text/PDF
Rights Brigham Young University; http://lib.byu.edu/about/copyright/generic.php Public Domain Public
Language English; eng; en
Relation Central Utah Project; Western Waters Digital Library; CHAPTER 111 III lii AFFECTED environment AND environmental consequences table 37 impacts on wildlife habitat caused by the diamond fork system alternatives compared to the 1984 FES plan alternative species habitat acres lost permanent teer TeME temporary orary recommended plan mule deer range ranged range1 nonwinter Non winter 387 60 normal winter 607 245 severe winter 713 340 bobcat 334 610 golden eagle 536 661 coopers hawk 98 11 beaver 37 14 A mule deer range range1 ranged nonwinter Non winter 648 75 normal winter 771 251 severe winter 713 340 bobcat 341 624 golden eagle 545 698 coopers hawk 98 22 beaver 14 28 C mule deer range range1 ranged nonwinter Non winter 648 75 normal winter 723 58 severe winter 561 1 bobcat 70 92 golden eagle 182 166 3 66 gg .66 66 coopers hawk 63 22 beaver 21 28 1984 FES plan mule de3r dear range range1 ranged nonwinter Non winter 1339 360 normal winter 446 303 severe winter 702 352 bobcat 426 1151 golden eagle 643 1284 coopers hawk 98 23 beave beaver2 beaverr ra r2 9 28 1 these figures include loss of habitat value and use by mule deer caused by construction disturbance and use of primary access roads 2 there is a net gain in usable habitat for beaver because of the elimination of high irrigation flows in upper sixth water creek 89
Identifier http://cdm15999.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/WesternWatersProject/id/12961

© Western Waters Digital Library - GWLA member projects - Designed by the J. Willard Marriott Library - Hosted by Oregon State University Libraries and Press