Record Details

page 164

Digital Collections at BYU

Field Value
Title page 164 Final supplement to the final environmental impact statement : Diamond Fork System, Bonneville Unit, Central Utah Project, page 164
Coverage Electronic reproduction;
Format 164 text/PDF
Rights Brigham Young University; http://lib.byu.edu/about/copyright/generic.php Public Domain Public
Language English; eng; en
Relation Central Utah Project; Western Waters Digital Library; CHAPTER IV consultation AND coordination features and sizes essentially these executive orders were complied with in the 1984 final environmental statement WRITTEN WRITTZK COMCBHT ene UNT eme 98 of the approximately one million people in the central utah water conservancy districtr district districts Distri ctr only about seven people expressed their views at the public hearings on this DS held on june 20 and 21 1989 clearly there is little public involvement in the important matters considered further no cooperating agencies presented statements as to their positions and responsibilities relating to the project RZSPOUSZ SXSPONSX 98 the public was clearly given opportunity to comment on the draft supplement there has been considerable input from the public and numerous local state and Fe federal deal deai agencies during the plan formulation process comments on the draft supplement were received in writing from many of these cooperating agencies these comments are included in this final supplement MRITTKN WITTZN COIAOCNT 99 we call attention to the need to make public the 1988 definite plan report the existence of which we have become aware through statements made by BOR officials the original 1964 DPR is long out of date we believe that it is illegal for this project to proceed before a revised definite plan report has been adopted by the proper authority RZSPOKSZ 99 reclamation acknowledges the need for a supplement to the 1964 definite plan report in order to accurately describe the current plan for the irrigation and drainage system of the bonneville unit beginning in the early 19801s 1980 reclamation began the process of developing that supplement only to have modification to the plan render invalid each draft document prior to its finalization the may 1988 draft is the latest in a series of three drafts which only partially reflect the irrigation and drainage system being unanimously supported by the utah delegation once the draft legislation is enacted reclamation will produce any necessary supplement to the 1964 definite plan report WITTZN KRZTTXN COMMIT COMMENT 100 the environment of diamond fork canyon has not been adequately studied it is known that one inhabitant of diamond fork is the western milk shake which is protected by the state of utah the desert ecology of the canyon should not be disrupted by a project which has not been clearly defined RZSPCUSZ 100 there have been adequate terrestrial and aquatic inventories and studies of the diamond fork canyon area prior to preparation of the 1984 FES these studies provided the baseline information for the impact analyses in the 1984 FES and this supplement the utah milk snake was identified in the wildlife inventory as being present in the study area the utah milk snake is listed in the 1987 list of native utah wildlife species of special concern as a sensitive species 164 BEST COPY AVAILABLE 173
Identifier http://cdm15999.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/WesternWatersProject/id/12960

© Western Waters Digital Library - GWLA member projects - Designed by the J. Willard Marriott Library - Hosted by Oregon State University Libraries and Press