Record Details
page 136
Digital Collections at BYU
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Title | page 136 Final supplement to the final environmental impact statement : Diamond Fork System, Bonneville Unit, Central Utah Project, page 136 |
| Coverage | Electronic reproduction; |
| Format | 136 text/PDF |
| Rights | Brigham Young University; http://lib.byu.edu/about/copyright/generic.php Public Domain Public |
| Language | English; eng; en |
| Relation | Central Utah Project; Western Waters Digital Library; CHAPTER IV consultation AND coordination 4 the alternatives are written to describe the difference in levels of irrigation developments although they are not adequately described when in reality the different alternatives really measure alternative levels of fishery flow development in the strawberry aqueduct it seems therefore that the document pretends to be a supplement to a final EIS on a power system changing the emphasis to evaluating alternatives on different lines of irrigation but in reality the document develops plans for different levels of stream st reiam heiam fishery flows in the strawberry aqueduct which are not evaluated or described at all rmspok8z ak8ponsx 31 see response to written comment 30 reclamation believes that the subject supplement is in substantial compliance with the desires of the district the alternative plans described in the supplement were developed to correspond with irrigation concepts facilities and operation of the proposed iad lad system see response to written comments 5 and 10 NRITTIN WRITTBN CONMKNT CONMT 32 comments on need for action page 6 alternatives A and B have features in the same location at the beginning and end of the diamond fork power system the syar tunnel funnel is the same and monks hollow dam and reservoir is the same the power system in between is different and that should be the main emphasis of of this document paragraph 1 sates the only significant concerns and an needs which emerged since publication of the EIS are related to electrical energy requirements because irrigation of lands in the spanish fork area has been included as a project purpose the irrigation requirements in the juab area and sevier river area are also included in alternatives A and B but not described in the EIS to be a complete EIS these irrigation areas need to be described it seems that reclamation decided they wanted to construct a certain power plant and needed something to help justify it so they added the spanish fork irrigation as a project purpose in analyzing the diamond fork system in this manner the district suggests that reclamation seems to be losing sight of the original statement or game plan of the 1973 bonneville unit EIS in that six systems will have EISs prepared 1 starvation collection system 2 strawberry aqueduct and collection system 3 diamond fork power sys system em 4 irrigation and drainage system 5 municipal and industrial water system and 6 bureau of indian affairs activity 136 115 11 5 5 |
| Identifier | http://cdm15999.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/WesternWatersProject/id/12915 |
