Record Details
page 134
Digital Collections at BYU
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Title | page 134 Final supplement to the final environmental impact statement : Diamond Fork System, Bonneville Unit, Central Utah Project, page 134 |
| Coverage | Electronic reproduction; |
| Format | 134 text/PDF |
| Rights | Brigham Young University; http://lib.byu.edu/about/copyright/generic.php Public Domain Public |
| Language | English; eng; en |
| Relation | Central Utah Project; Western Waters Digital Library; CHAPTER IV consultation AND coordination temperature and low dissolved oxygen levels in diamond fork it appears from the modeling for condition A releasing from below the thermocline on strawberry that dissolved oxygen levels will be below state water quality standards and beneficial bene finial uses would wnuld be impaired we request that in the final EIS reclamation describe specifically how this entire diamond fork spanish fork river system be monitored to accurately document such problems we request that reclamation coordinate closely with the bureau of water pollution control in the water quality studies we also request that reclamation coordinate with the state during development of measures to mitigate temperature and dissolved oxygen problems AXSPONSX AZSPCKSZ 26 reclamation has committed to monitor the diamond fork spanish fork river system and to mitigate any violations of the state v pter iter ter quality standards reclamation will coordinate closely with the bureau of water pollution control and the resource agencies in developing the monitoring program and in conducting the water quality studies As requested we will also coordinate with the state during the development of measures to mitigate temperature andor dissolved oxygen problems if they occur the final supplement has been modified to include this coordination letter from fcobk state of utah office of planning and budget dated june 28 1989 HRITTZN COUMT 27 on page 20 alternative A states st acea atea aces the average annual diversions to the bonneville basin would consist of 142500 acre feet of project proje ct water developed in the uinta basin and 56700 acre feet of strawberry project water the 1984 final environmental impact statement for the diamond fork system indicates that an average of 137400 acre feet of project water and 61000 acre feet of strawberry project water would be diverted annually from uinta basin please explain the difference in the figures and if additional project water has been identified since 1984 for diversion to the bonneville basin could that extra water be used to help meet the 1980 instream stream In flow agreement RZSPMSZ 27 the total annual diversion to the bonneville basin for alternative A of 199200 acre feet is nearly the same sanve sane as the total for the 1984 final environmental impact statement of 198400 acre feet the small difference comes from a slightly different project demand pattern which is present in these two alternatives the difference between the two strawberry valley project diversions 56700 acre feet versus 61000 acre feet has occurred because we used estimates based on our best assumptions at the time these two documents were written we are in the process of negotiating vith with the strawberry valley water users to determine the strawberry valley diversion but it will not be known until the negotiations have been completed 134 BEST COPY opy ava1w E 43 113 |
| Identifier | http://cdm15999.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/WesternWatersProject/id/12868 |
