Record Details

page S

Digital Collections at BYU

Field Value
Title page S Final supplement to the final environmental impact statement : Diamond Fork System, Bonneville Unit, Central Utah Project, page S
Coverage Electronic reproduction;
Format S-2 text/PDF
Rights Brigham Young University; http://lib.byu.edu/about/copyright/generic.php Public Domain Public
Language English; eng; en
Relation Central Utah Project; Western Waters Digital Library; SUMMARY continued most of the system would be in utah county but a small portion at the upper end would be in wasatch county the system would be constructed in the diamond fork and sixth water drainages in the uinta national forest of the wasatch mountain range sixth water is a tributary of diamond fork which is a tributary of the spans spanish ish fork river elevations of project features would range from about 7600 to 5000 feet alternatives three alternatives alternative 3 for the diamond fork system are presented in this supplement the recommended plan and alternative A would deliver water to both the municipal and industrial mai egi egl m&i and led systems but would require additional NEPA compliance to cover construction of the led system alternative C corresponds with the no action alternative for the iad lad system the recommended plan and alternative C provide for a reduced transbasin trans basin diversion of water from the uinta basin to the bonneville basin to satisfy the requirements of the 1980 instream stream In flow agreement for uinta basin streams alternative A provi provides dIss for a larger transbasin trans basin diversion and assumes that the In stream flow agreement would be satisfied by other means all three alternatives would provide water for supplemental service irrigation in the spanish fork area and would include recreation flood control and fish and wildlife mitigation and enhancement measures power for project pumping would also be developed and potential would exist for further nonfederal non federal development of power summary data for the major facilities and the plan recommended in the 1984 FES are shown in summary table 1 with the recommended plan the system would receive water from strawberry reservoir through syar tunnel from the tunnel outlet water would enter sixth water aqueduct which would include sixth water pipeline sixth water shaft and sixth water tunnel water from the aqueduct would be discharged into sixth water creek through last chance powerplant Power plant and then enter monks hollow reservoir water from monks hollow reservoir would enter the proposed diamond fork pipeline and be conveyed to the iad lad system as discussed in the 1984 FES flows not conveyed in the pipeline would enter the diamond fork stream channel below monks hollow dam and subsequently the spanish fork river water for irrigation of supplemental service lands in the spanish fork area would be diverted from the river by existing strawberry valley project facilities monks hollow and diamond fork powerplants Power plants and an enlarged last chance powerplant Power plant could be constructed if nonfederal non federal financing is obtained the recommended plan would provide 10.5 105 105 MW of generating capacity to meet project pumping requirements of the bonneville unit up to 46 MW of additional capacity could be added with sufficient nonfederal non federal financing see summary tables 1 and 2 S 2 0 C f fil ill lii
Identifier http://cdm15999.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/WesternWatersProject/id/12770

© Western Waters Digital Library - GWLA member projects - Designed by the J. Willard Marriott Library - Hosted by Oregon State University Libraries and Press