Record Details
page 4-104
Digital Collections at BYU
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Title | page 4-104 Finding of No Significant Impact Lake Fork Section 203 Alternative : Proposed Action, page 4-104 |
| Coverage | Electronic reproduction; |
| Format | 4-104 text/PDF |
| Rights | Brigham Young University; http://lib.byu.edu/about/copyright/generic.php Public Domain Public |
| Language | English; eng; en |
| Relation | Central Utah Project; Western Waters Digital Library; comment letter no 13 an integral pan part odthe ofthe of the commitments made when the CUP was authorized and re authorized were the projects to provide benefits to the uinta basin including the section 203 2 03 projects A strong commitment to certain environmental projects was also part of the authorization and authorization reauthorization re of the CUP this 203 project meets both goals since the CUP was first discussed diss cussed stabilization of the mountain reservoirs has been a priority of a large number nunker of organizations and residents the stabilization of the mountain reservoirs on the provo river has served as a model for moving storage and restoring the function of these mountain reservoirs to that of a natural lake A great deal of time and energy has been expended in the effort to stabilize the mountain reservoirs by MLWUA NILWUA and its shareholders CUWCD ch2nu14 ch2mhffl interior the duchesne Duche soe county water conservancy district and many others chap 1.6 16 ig lg p 14 1 4 suggested clarification of mom mooa lake project and related projects 13.1 131 east bast eza timothy reservoir was constructed in 1951 the moon lake project developed only onty onby 35261 AF of active storage the dead storage 13.2 132 pool at moon lake existed before the project as a natural lake fake hake it may not be accurate to say there werm were wemm humerousr numerous other projects related to the moon 13.3 133 lake project prcject twin pots reservoir big sand wash reservoir and brown draw reservoir were the related projects the midview nfidview reservoir was a part of the original moon lake project chap 2221.2 22212 22212 p 24 2 4 suggested clarification of united states FAut easement fautement ement this section indicates the united states would have an easement for the storage of 12000 AF this is inconsistent with table 1.51 151 15 151 1 on page 19 1 9 and the understanding of MLWUA NLWUA in previous negotiations we understood that 4500 AF of the new 12000 AF of storage capacity will wid belong to MLWUA NEWUA to replace the moua mountain tain reservoir storage we prefer the explanation as set up in table 151 15 1 on page 19 1 9 and the wording used in previous documents which states the united states would also obtain a contractual right from the MLWUA NLWUA to 7500 acre emt feet ext heet of 13.4 134 storage capacity in the enlarged ies res reservoir emir elir and utilizing water rights held by the united states would divert store and release project water from the enlarged dam and reservoir the theremaining remaining 4500 acre feet of storage capacity in the enlarged reservoir would be owned and utilized by the MLWUA ULWUA for the exclusive storage of their non project high mountain lake storage ri nights rights girts those associated with the four stabilized lakes in the upper lake fork river wat watershed ershoV of ofcoursethe course the numbers would be changed to 6500 acre feet for the MLWUA and 5500 acre feet for the united states if the mountain reservoirs on the yellowstone river system are stabilized table 221 22 221 21 2.21 2 1 p 27 2 7 suggested clarification of conservation pool maximum depth 13.5 135 our calculations suggest the Comer conservation vation pool maximum depth is 3 318 31.8 1.8 18 18 feet 2 ah 7h ftmaaiijfcrwtukotliil nk W V V ai A i i A 6f af 1 iriirfiimniiiniiitit7vioomuiulf GW M 4 cel cbl C V i ia i8 72. 72 i abw tbw CKF ckeartatl V th h buk bui ruk page 2 of 4 4104 4 104 |
| Identifier | http://cdm15999.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/WesternWatersProject/id/12060 |
