Record Details
page 183
Digital Collections at BYU
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Title | page 183 State review, Bonneville Unit, Central Utah Project, Final report, page 183 |
| Coverage | Electronic reproduction; |
| Format | 183 text/PDF |
| Rights | Brigham Young University; http://lib.byu.edu/about/copyright/generic.php Public Domain Public |
| Language | English; eng; en |
| Relation | Central Utah Project; Western Waters Digital Library; 51 5 1 52 5 2 53 5 3 54 5 4 55 5 5 56 5 6 57 7 5 58 5 8 amal ment smal HI of 0 c 19 v u u c ov c or 0 a lands m c hiir uiir selling w c i wo 19 11 w graded o 19 i w w ie e Q he ss people 0 aw ams ask ui and c u a i it r i 0 to 0 i depart a ii tt 0 simm wish samm a california 0 decrease L downgraded maj maa nation j oi u ig 13 e of 0 a this c to j u ai irrigation ig cla CLI ala CL I at i iur3ui instead actual 3 davis 4 u i ia CL ui perhaps c i oi 0 o 31 u a u ozlu CTXU L 0 W M m lu c communities e c e emst must emsl 3 u u i central 11 1 1 3 that c 11 1 1 c noted i m this c r notices 0 reports 0 c i 0 S u a r 03 down 3 utah sc ame the amm e through oc in now not 0 J 0 3 14 have 10 L Q i best ui amo who ago c glom from klom 0 0 io 0 E a zhe the amm c T i a a u L ie much 3 e because u a c 0 L i j 0 1 3 i so 0 S the c 1 ai u e u s u moms does momm 0 likely i t c zae the zam C L sector ii i ea u & a 0 one e wildlife 0 o 0 o ii i i ui e m u i ca c5 a j u then ai ui ame the amm c aj in e e c u in c 0 o 0 mam and maw c policy u & 01 Is w as ig a moms does momm g & v ajc abc ai & ui sim sha iia i i weber a further j meen been to 0 r m 0 ghe the c a c thought 3 c Q hunter c will f be Q lol for gor 0 of this whe the a aj 3j L uu z C Q ii 0 0 owns a mia esa oij 3 2 40 e M farmers S 3 u maio maro thanked c 0 o passed wo residents j 0 o and e mat not mal 0 3 a farmers E lulal rural t n ui v u p s using zot zol iq TU e fl nol not mol 0 ul ua u1 lc ba b3 1 study 3 1 01 3 1 l 0 C u 01 1 I Q ig ul CJ ll 11 Z JZ L C horses oae ese osa os0 3 fl mls l 1 mave have mase t odma cost ot o factory t while 0 education 3 tl klom from gloa QU Q U i U ttl 3 1 C 1 I u U lands c i mam and mcm c policy a mame lake mase 0 10 u j u c increase 11 u a aj plains i lda &4j is which is fl programs 10 agriculture agricuture 3 maintain M by 1 l QC county C C S 0 0 iga ig2 1 aj 3j U r church 3 C U dietr distr wa w1 0 C cb u 0 ca c a ai oj 3 pool poor 0 a have L uo u o x e survey i floodplains Q e in nol not mol 0 water s 3 0 will 0 Q amm the gme C 0 0 0 ame the amm C bureaucracies U 4 C 4 agricultural 3 exi enr just 3 glom from gloe 0 30 3 0 S CQ II 11 CU shareholders J 3 XL U L fl ta t3 should 3 C urc urm CIC C I C U CML CM L 1 0 5 X power X C OI 01 cew new u policy cn a s ai 0 salt r racing 10 c i a state na in e aak 322 3.22 maa flood 0 0 developments 0 0 in L ui c 0 o fa oo u streams iu ai soo aou sou S ou v it gme the amm Is u J && fl co mamle state 0 .0 0 o M wi 0 0 .0 utah ia i amm the c glom from 0 canning c c ii S 0 04 041 1 na a c u 11 e watts 11 1 1 fc 0 ext ems 4 r subdivided J & 4 & C 3 aj 4j 3 amas jams q a 41 4 1 money C U L aj 4j q U lc 1 1 should rg ui aj i should 3 e a a w 0 o 0 0 o 0 e at io 0 mineral 01 w u it project of 0 w megawatts 2 3 n 4 i 0 prevented i i u afu cfu sufficiency c u E se as i if a conservancy & i 0 3 3 sodbust ja j3 0 baj iaj raa rna ig Is ulcj3 state ig utah ia foe 0 in C tj ui il ur decline 4 district u J 4 & tal taa 0 surpluses or 0 cn o state irrigated 0 in 3 a 4 t relationship 0 conservation 4 UI I 1 ui S amcy many iw U 1 a 0 jast jdst ata aaa 3 growing 01 u state 3 geam city lean fl v eo 41 e ui project u that J io C a watts ji j 4 i 0 sm amma mega amba iu E u 4 vl L u 41 Q a usg vag esq usq differs 0 O ome one omm C 3 t traffic t 0 I 1 J LQ 0 1 1 0 wao C ic iq 3 & vi lia lna alij lij this be n in et ai accommodate E aaa aio qia u oa federal D mad and maw e ai a church 3 iu 0 megawatts x w v 0 o to 0 ei Is e mamle state ma m a luc tuc lda tu awe the lwe c moles acres laa LAJ S 41 4 1 i i & j ui a 0 o 41 na 0 o zesel level c Q s a w payers sua su3 166 0 have alfalfa ba b3 u that fl 0 ta t3 visited a i ii i zhe the c elm its eam kr ei 11 .11 1 1 mase lake male j zhe the gme j considered u j u tuv avi tui j mey CTI emy ia a i U U i fl tuc tuz icc igc u w momm some bome S self u this rg li j m water 41 & in amma mega sega u ratepayers Q & e it if to dot not cow c oj u e 0 J ia c aj water irrigation uses policy iga igj fwu feu years ig 01 e is u i 0 viable 41 c v io g L utah i i amm the j a c u 0 J 0 NC N this C X q oj e g 3 10 amm the gme c v 3 nea new oj ai on to lmke rate that j molz soil 0 g note 0 j u 4 at 3t i ta ia i3 extensive C ieee iel e surpluses 0 o u 0 cej c4j noze note aole to aj water 3 C w mic mim in 0 salt this c 01 this 0 o aj i 166 ua u3 demand S u t am ui should s u e e 0 0 o B this 0 o e yi 00 o oo o geological 0 ai subsidize 1 ee e e u aj se reclamation ai should 3 3 project i 0 0 e a oi and c CT 11 be ja gor for kol 0 v 21 of reagan 0 v g o xo x o 3 na uc a 0 oc oe o e oa o urban a raising i r ia 0 10 ni io c 3 m ealm paid emim io 0 30 3.0 30 za a utah kene five 3 ai and c m ui loa goa ame the amm e reable OJ V L & 27340 27.340 n we oj eias eins aj c L OJ ui hearings roa now rma 0 by Is 0 u j 0 3 duchesne e a iu mma new ema of 0 0 o TO suj orui ui Q 3 3 m zhe the e u 0 a i 3 e a a i c t3 ta e melow below m en u c and c a a IXJ u emge page emme a na n3 oe c desireable u irrigation oi oyo oye a o ul state ii i cu io i t 0 to 0 j at r drainage ig cl people C 0 c sufficiency ua u1 lol for gor 0 agricultural i 3 maintained g decline e declines e j n U ehl ebl J aj i a J might au 3 t paying TQ c 3 3. ig aj 40 e IB of 0 t dollers dolldrs with up money s ms u L after 11 1 1 lal for ual a i i 0 of t emmi desi emma u lands c kobec power lobed of tai wai tat i 3 ai oti u c u u e money c ug utah 11 1 1 water 0 o ai central ii i i i built extensive osz OSC azz on 0 maintaining na aj 0 U I 1 ns u a OO 00 O mand land O C ix aj t ako aso 0 malm lake mame KO 10 C clt3t president 3 amael water amzel M 41 fl 0 u 0 1 modd hold 0 O comments S U 0 c district S 3 0 B C Q 1 X I 0 ame the amm C J C U 0 O ui U 3 supply bal mal q0 Q qa years ai &i 3 aj 3 M e U ra r0 U either C CJ L U UI 11 3 01 E 0 S 4 X OJ melow below beloz r k u jtb jt3 ars ors 0 O introduction 0 3 CI X na j 0 Is 0 o ame the amm c 0 a clean a gme the ame j ai i 3 ig u oe 0 in c ui law tax zax io gme the amm atz quadrant is a u lands c 0 m oj ai bureau cin ali also mg ual for kar 1 aih counties w river i 4 be oj OJ C u j v 19 19 zhe the gme S UM 19 s cju cj3 be invested ui conflict utah self no living lmo the amo aon ten zon CQ C 0 irrigated CT C L 0 io irrigation 3313 0 to C 0 3 C 3 and C federal 0 US u L 11 iou on these wow now that ig ui u 3 3 u y e to u mcg mag should ue u this e that C ig 3 e E ac ahe the ame zol not zal ai u mso aso 3so fc ug intermountain tt B j when m providing is 3 opportunities 3 c 3 c wig reappropriated appropriated 4 thus of u a ai zhe the ahm C JJ production J lands C 1 U S agricultural U america L I 1 0 jordan 0 0 cost U aj 2j zam its ggs should 0 of ua u1 specific J borrowing 0 KI 0 in C happens Q glom from gloa 0 S w ame the amm C u rg next x U in ch 3 fl business e i 3 e iu s io 0 ai i 0 u i is ui m a QQ m ii i i impact oc ams may amy ig c co a u cache u e 0 o afford 0 u 4 u 0 e 0 s conservancy E level northwest in 0 e s e ai of 0 0 0 ui m lu 11 1 1 s wea yet sma aj L a there a xo X o utah 10 m 0 ai seems 11 ai lqis this e a j i owns tt aj present ui in u t e what that whal be 3 ii gme the amm e fol for lor 0 c c L d ii i aj r ome one c a 0 zhe the ghe ea a ea e a ajr aji ari aj i acj aca cea new ama ca c a 0 0 uu quality a m t iu & 0 as r c or 0 ui 0 0 water re since c uj & j fc gme see gem as 3s 1 asssumption sumption qc 3 e oi o 0 i of i oct o gme the ame ct of w mcd and mcm e ibm hwo ibo ib feeding o e it w 19 3 a the c mot not mol 0 states a ins utah io lal for ual fc 0 glee time glem 01 aig atw eig 3 0 standard o e ia of 0 gomm some gobe 0 m E amo the smo ai 0 uu city it i foot goz gom toz 0 0 a Is m s whal what 3 e fl a mho who nho 3 e 0 603 003 602 gou s sizable m in watts na n3 qc Q u ai presence m c u ai c ig j 0 a c c fl agriculture 3 C 1 irrigation in i kj amm the lmo every u u M 3 ame the amm aj ul actually ees aes agriculture 3 present ll 11 OH L U t S UI F 3 U 4 U 0 w1 wa 41 OJ L OI 01 0 zhe the ame C become megawatts 3 u ams ass amm u 4 0 ont out ant 3 L OJ aj district i 0 aj c amole whole 3 to g v mrm are mum i water 4 t r c aj i ui na oi a ia i0 m 1 0 aita ait3 elder water oma can laa nake lake nase land emma that we wonder ia 37 eo e america jm stadd statd Q r ig m ia CM a a glo gln olo e mema Mega m a au 2u L AL encouraging 3 L & C feo fee iao ia o u n aa 3a u this aio eio oiw oio recreational io 11 3 J 12 4217 M of 0 14 M 24 CM 35 cn 0 a o biz bim i iz up 3 ai OU q go 0 turnover muj OUJ mot not mol 0 0 2 ig ua u1 S J a U t1 ta U 0 r 01 C the thus eoa aoa C 3 ui ams may amy qk EOQ EO ak of a basic ut Q a near ig e lo u U co uok for L to zaa zaz 0 ou water g J I 1 3 c max box mam X a Is ui c we aj 3j cu 2 ame the amm HI cc already gaj naj naa I 1 g4j that 0 page CL 01 1 l as ui a ig praised oo 00 fl i of at iia gia i w ic why x iu i L J general C abc gic gim aic oj u age the zge 3 there IU e s emmo page o4ji orji efe eee 0fl 1 g utah j 4 ghe the gme j a salt ig lame page edge 0a 0 aa u o amm the gme e auch much U e 3 this m e above 0 d ig emge page emme Q u 03 xi bought ja j5 0 cn amter water amler emme page lage a oj 0 9 a page 01 0 3 mave have mase js aj 3 eean mean eman ino igo rno s D 400 0 r ells pick U a in WA CLUBS a 3 e0yalaill il sj hasouicas P iii lii iel th i recreation OUTDOOR a lupu vij luw lup ai 3i zhe ehe muldow ouldow 0 so 3 1kn4 lla 113 ilg ll3 and mid end 1985 g jie sie m WESTERN h decess demess law zae ili III 111 ilk mmel 1961 wi 3 14 3 or 0 h exl mul axe oge Sce oga sceptic sceitic zumo itic mulo 0 lewk sewk s a sawma aawma I 1 J MIJ I lii lit iii irsiderion elg eeg k M ia ap l91aij 1 pgolocliuoi 14 044 I 1 044 04.4 iwo ISO mso va v& i M S wmqpi C 4 mawp maws hwwp IILI OOM ulf uli uni jl I 1 W W I 1 ii 1 W jillion jilliln awk 00 0.0 00 om U 0k ak j U al 91 j A 9l mma ema U H ji io ji I 1 S j H nln nin min liml llml leml wus all W 11 ii H I 1 zoz moz dev WAV 044 0.44 1 pj M till w ij ja 044 P V is jjfpilii BI a A 11 ii 1984 a s a h Is 3 ia i2 p ia i3 2 ja j1 j 113 lii jillinll IN ma m1 P j4 ja ni ihl HA jid fid jih ns 5 W ai A 4i i aie iye tye iie L 0 lol for log i a s federal u erosion slu leu dollars farmers maez soil is project 21 Q aj 4j ot vt thus agricultural u while v 0 c 0 Is outdoor u u mope hope 0 may bay mas 0 o of aspects QU te in eo 3 e paying e a i 3 utah which unexpected gj aa conservancy i 11 a ia c q bribing o i policy 01 c in c a u u m e oc o amo the c of 0 L a a there a fragile ci 0 2 x I 1 0 aspect u september a ig Ts g ie a Q c clubs ai c a i aj smal year nemr aj billion ai i u i zhe the ghe of on e a c llomo provo llono 0 0 0 1 iq ig av airt aera alaa in c t ui i Is z votes j u & 00 6 0 mrm are ale & 3 J lo 10 1 U U ammus years a 3 g 0 western central Q kaa laa 3 tl states QJ increased OJ a las lqs ls W aj 4j i C of an e u i ui 0 o 11 ie in the c s ai u 0 cht lat laa ns U 0 0 U ua u1 I 1 U az 3z J JI 3 outdoor a 34 c u 0 0 project o mulm dike mumm water 3 gaas this agricultural j a article la 10 ja j0 50 l0 c zons tons e 0 fc eo bol 401 4ol agricultural avenue C aj U federation ig 0 projects gol for kol 0 03 friday J over U department L simultaneously C lands C of 0 U farmers 0 of 0 the & r 3 review i to on c t v sc in w KS 0 o a e j 03 luls city 1984 7 0 iu u resolutions 3 0 i resolutions 3 os to oe o elah utah eawh ial ifl e 0 euk igl fuk oi elt elc united t mas has mam ia 0 co uo c i oa ie 0 oi j e a D Q 0 fl c c f CTQ 3 u io e I 1 0 O tn & u 0 w gamam state 0 utah K IS 0 ai 3 0 r billion c e 11 1 1 Ms second e ox o mame lake aie aio x 84103 western a a u ui a e oo 00 n s nol not amt 0 c i eme the emm s 4 na n3 on e a i amma that e umil soil 0 spending 0 af t erosive v0 va degradation 0 o our 3 tso lmo mus buy quy 3 federation i examining e V KC u w a i state io amm the gme e i IQ R c ow a c 3 0 a mul ebl 0 a n aj uco jao october 0 aj & u IU L K of reclamation E of journal t ti eu ii i i fj i & z 0 o 1 at 3t 0 irrigation 0 gme the amm C t 0 central na n3 0 3t3 sodbuster 3 C 10 l 6 0 Q V 01 94 9.4 i c u M SOIM to ug gl two central i e 0 a 0 0 o w agriculture while u salt utah 0 a of ur i e e aj u iu 0 .0 a that c 0 uc u c io i o anz 721 cm tal iau idu u o zacc amm the eca ecc 1984 t u ai u 0 u bovard 0 mentions to i 3 sp la 13 l3 1 3 L eek CTI mek 0 I 1 address 1 i 0 some 0 0 C mow now cow 0 t highly U ul u ahm the zhe ual for lag resources gme the gge order c in em passed a se zhe the khe ocoa owoa ahe the ahm of M street K IU s smal year i ui fl fmc c 0 0 u j g daw dow 44j C project in i a super a ig Is a v c supports a by 3 i congratulate recommendation utah84116 84116 federation 3 concerning c QLO mlo federal to a a by s bureau 3 0 address ai james S 3 article programs sc a the farmland s between u ac in a temple appropriate natural Utah clubs almb wish reviewing wall by mma sam bam tons government quality zamd land passed project 3 1 efforts 0 water to 0 1 c i i u 0 3 price a a 15 D to 0 giu gru tiu 0 41 4 1 i 0 a f goom good 0 oe 0 ame the amm j s I 1 i n y khe the ehe ac 3c t a e states 0 reynolds this io 0 oar oai aar o ai K 0 o 1 of l north LJ olan city guzy reynolds 0 speak U 0 of fc J 0 O 1 J uncle UI 0 71v zow low zaw 0 age the gge 0 a 0 0 c of i oc o c outdoor ota ot3 0 X wimm wish wesh bic lic lia iic in states 0 oo 0 ii wish n commentary c e billion of 0 na s cc zu conservation connection very 0 ulah utah ulam 0 mcm and mcq c alz all and e aaa zao zam aao project |
| Identifier | http://cdm15999.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/WesternWatersProject/id/11612 |
