Record Details
page 276
Digital Collections at BYU
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Title | page 276 State review, Bonneville Unit, Central Utah Project, Final report, page 276 |
| Coverage | Electronic reproduction; |
| Format | 276 text/PDF |
| Rights | Brigham Young University; http://lib.byu.edu/about/copyright/generic.php Public Domain Public |
| Language | English; eng; en |
| Relation | Central Utah Project; Western Waters Digital Library; V yi of 0 of 0 U iu fol for lol i 0 of 40 0 in f u jj B flow 0 s 0 2 0 a utah e 10 duchesne iu u c c 01 ai v c u c zhe the ai e ii suz zza a possible aj s i feet a a 0 e o 0 e s to i 0 4 ute i lu e a 0 alternative s i 0 .0 flow 0 of 0 acm and mcm c a 3 high duchesne ai emans means emacs 0 o review airt irt ame the amm e review u u plan i rm bonneville a of 03 ezo ego ultimate no c & u 10 3 is ii Q i aj CTI oj 0 0 mole acre molo S QU VI waters 0 s a M tu available aue nuz rue be iu oc o rights c s e i a L u 01 later 4 diversion i e a a basically ur v u 01 0 0 .0 m in C 3 OT ia 3 3. 0 O iu 0 3 u kay may kas 0 o 3 is fl fl this S js 1 4 ame the amm f Q domm domo a meeting OU be of 00 to bonneville through 00 CQ agreed SZO S smo Z O ul io a light c central 0 to o unit D u a 0 u i 3 01 ci aj 0 f instream stream S doa 04j dwa U 0 4 OJ 1 1 aj 4j 0 C ca c4 c0 ca uuk uu1 3 C i CQ d a instream stream su reallocation i u s 0 ome the s as os nea naa 4 0 a si ou lmo the 0 those o in j e dao one zao is i s i 0 ua u0 tal tfl except i u detailed 0 o nol not 0 east unit e oi 137400 conceptual which entitled unit tunnel In lol for gor 0 1 3 neme need meme 1 l a au water 4 oi i i e 3 3 i i In c r mam and maw e ai mr x in c 0 o co lal for ual w ai is i i ig it whe the wae S cr 3 W S hanna ct ood oed 00 OOU requested U gorge future to umel feet utz uta ut3 U 4 purposes 0 a review 3 zhe the mutually zhe the water 4 noom used rua iua tda i io i a oi ss A would 3 i 0 s 10 m zhe the ghe j aj by bonneville n 3 a 0 c u 0 i u 0 0 replace 3 u so report indian 0 o gorge s 3 3 1 l power 3 ja j3 would ac 3c comes needs 0 water 4 3 bonneville t unit e 0 wa w3 ezan plan ezma 0 Q 0 U C 0 basin v by cio ojo aio oc ig ai4j existing mear near meal 0 o 0 o u to e c Q ai u mole acre molm u lepolt report qa Q a 11 ua u3 m 3 no 0 be ai 01 Q u s 0 e us uzo uso o 3 e i 4 i c a a eo ajac & e ca ua u& appropriated e u u makle state makoe io e u nson naon flaming original a exportation 0 i CT u e done 0 o example ex 0 e n imai x if 0 onzy only oazy c i 19 e 0 o mgo ute mso i c rights io ae3o aeao utah TO OUIO project I 1 H tu t u review v caz cao basin L that zai zal cai doos doom woos a 3 that io caa can oma rot row satisfying amo the 01 future 3 considered 0 U olk oll ouk oh contemplated S then aa a3 0 flaming uinta ovy ma is i 4 4 sa i s oa i u laa caa ca c3 D w reclamation s 137400 0 3 u 0 o ri prescribed ii i i v 0 o aaa aam eam aa3 from 0 0 o m c amm the lmo j zam was amm bonneville ai su 10 r u concluding zam the lao j u aj 4j U &0 to reallocation uc oi & reservoir 4 presumably c a 3 a MS c a uloa from glom 0 ame the c 0 n e u i u wc that adl for &0u sou whee when & 403 0 present u &j aj 30 ur ua u1 C water id iu 3 ui ai gor for gol 0 M airt irt u ai of ts t S 0 meala uinta et v u gor for would 3 D published 0 u a hearing the e s shown 0 0 amler water 3 aget meet agel 0 o uu such u s oa o3 03 zeam team zemm 03 03. qq of tta taa ita phase 0 0 ame the gme asam time asao 0 of u na io fully gamdy ai aj SC S CL ai si mioc o c s a vo voe voo o s 0 0 o se bajt oajt marc m u u e than 3 in cv 41 kv 41 .41 4 1 i a ta meem been u u aj gme the lmo e water of 0 i i 0 zum aue sue points s committed a to 0 satisfied mad and mae c a ame the amm s 3 1 1. ame the lmo 3 tai unit c creek u basin ui u ui iu flows oe have aag ajg eaul unit mauz ti diverted be u f 00 o oo o giu lid siu som soa so3 so earl part palt 3 3 10 mae maa aae 3ae s sooae ammas means emmam considered e any s board a ajas ajjs i kad and kam eo e o ia review a i aa aas aco azz 3 to D this a existing public i aa nao azo o 0 o i a sa nol not amt 0 iu of boundaries 0 emge page emme oi i ultimate ee aqueduct a aj aole more 0 project i rights c sv 3 uv emm dam gam 0 o e so C U IQ maeer under mamel 0 gloe from alme 0 it a 3 n bureau ie i e 0 therefore aj wai ui c c c ai OF water i as required 3 10 1.0 10 lt e ai wam was zam ah a h a 3 10 j t i amm the amo ai 0 u 0 0 plaz plan o r to be iu 0 m 3 y 0 at 3t divert s indian zos zoz oos moom rock uinta ca meb mha reclamation at a iu u & j j j Is v 0 o 3 a a mas has mau fl 0 jaaj u mgo eo QJ i ciz cyz studies ou oui evi ewi diversion i i be a w 3 0 bonneville i essentially 0 o js s i lu c ach ajh ame the amm J omm omo see o D otee exna mane ot3e a w i fc ua oi u3 ame the amm iu j 0 o ii rt project 0 usurp district to Q ca c4 aj 0 O previously 0 C 4 district & &c ac daa dwa possible fc714 mitigation Q amm the amo 8 q34jo to basin wa w1 U ajo 4jo of gorge & 1 l tj exporting & U utah i that & duchesne water 0 ui alternative e & to 0 0 c e yi water a J yl u s 0 U ula vla vii e 3jj3fcl be ai constraints i w diverted lua fcj ula faj 0 project u ute oe o ame the gme e oo3w a providing ua4j4 b 0 0 o a vt 05 0 5 mad and mam S & 0 3 d S 1 therefore 1 have 3 0 S agreement U 0 O C amme page emmo east of lam the aam zot not zol of 0 i 0 o iu 0 ai i c u 0 whe the who of needed i ia 3 recirculation a of t niz ziz sie s ie amm the omm au a aoi tos tas ioi would 3 j within project baua unit haza uinta central QU however C J 0 ajr ozme ujr gme the amu will 0 S 00 03 U proposal cl S laag kaaa flaming 0 O fol for lol OO 00 C concluded CC 3 required 1 continue geet feet U C th T h of t utsu S on oj3033 be resio rtsio 1 maam utah 4 U U J of 0 28 0 i 0 3 a i iu c mac mjc 3 would 3 oe fishery time S a m s elah utah momm i as io ia eaul part emul io 3 bureau z i will gor for gar OS 0 other S ct 0 U 0 0 zeah with u 3 e clu3 clua streams U U Q 3 0 aal not zal 0 1 a 0 u conservancy s mad and mae cs s c flow 0 on o n nol not oj 11 1.1 zhe the e s t cca aca u c s lz ml iolj iotj iu i 4 m23 i ui 0 aio cio aro will T use dze usi u si aie of 0 plans a j emla part 0 acquisition 0 mole acre molm i allocation 0 rt system 4 t 3 ula 114 uka question 1 utah bonneville 3 ame the amm S 0 O known 0 vl ame the amm 1 i U t1 ta 0 comment gme the years muma area mumm question she the sme is to amo the amm hauw unit bauw wam was zam maom back 1 central 4 C eastern 1 h mma 30 30 a project table 3 a e ii state ia e report a considered stream 0 fl water 1 l U io 0 0 C iu 1 agreement agreement discussed completed providing instream iv t ca io e oue m via vi qia a ns iu a to amm the amo i icso ucso 0 oi osa oia above a purpose 3 qctcsl op 27000 pump 3 Q wae the nam water 3 0 O U 0 meser river qi water fl S river oi ame the amm t aix ail qix i In es e this s within S vernal u central uj oae the gae bom see gom uta 10cq4 of basin tunnel 3 ame the amm 4jj3 became abigia aigia mountain becaj tecaj basin amm the gme ame the amm aee hm abandon act 1980 i indian ej the phase Q longer 0 amm the nhe response 281 28 1 amm 282 28 2 283 28 3 284 28 4 285 28 5 lem 286 kem 28 6 2815 28 15 2816 28 16 on 0 to 0 feet U il fol for lol 0 ame the amm C in 0 tu U V i that c 10 vi 0 o u division answered 41 4 1 1 S U 0 0 4 aj 3j moles acres & rights U several 1 molm acre nole iq purposes ane and ace 01 stated 1 1 U CT reference e 11 u i ame the amm m m emog meet egol u 10 10 0 o and water certificates amard heard 27000 27.000 other this lands to e 70000 gme the gmo j & 11 fl no exploring lamz that now new aez located reviewed amm the lmo is mas has mam the U aar for aal tv C mza 117 mma over y 11 priorities 0 en supports a n lol for gor i ciui prefer ai 3 i lemml right OT S Q 0 is mel mee 0fl mas has mam I 1 be about 0 there 0 S using 0 3 3 emme page V S 0 ja j3 & 0 1 l company compny yl include J OQ a tl t l U 3 S U moth both molm 0 ta t3 land i ou 0 lal laa s 3 lo 10 ea 00 oo u amm the gme s s on orm 010 mrm would 3 mam and mcm cj aja aaa water j district jj of 0 0 already a 0 to mal eal S vl t arto trto d 0& S anything to to previously S iu eap edp expressed alz all Q 0 light OT supervisors M e 0 o c it if 0 1 0 0 00 0 0 0 Q CT BS e u a purposes a am c a 0 a 0 0 tj additional & u ui a s oa 3 C 3 caa laa meetings u aj w 0 o i recommendation c maw ana mcw aix alx extended u 0 0 referred ai t commission adf asked worth L 01 ta t3 U 3 1 l at 0t resources 3 t ugat sent ugal zerm were zele u n 3 0 3 disregard SI u conservation as 5s of tx 0 U a 3 gran 1 wl 0 u 0 U i C 41 U anai cnai e ai v u power baz ban u 3 0 amm the lmo as be e mre are ale io u 0 i 3 i T c county m 0 a board 0 o au 3u 0 letter scoping 0 i 00 0 0 agricultural 3 taa kat U emma plan U concerns 0 xi ulcar ujcar u commission 10 10. 1 10 0 county 3 u i will amm the lmo utah 10 should 3 where ai 0 u c t years 0 o s soil vie uio vye i wildlife 3 amm the gme 0 report 0 m 0 3 s CT 0 s 0 u 1 Q i S 11 0 ki m lu ame the amm oho the ome a i to to 0 u i eam 3 e e 41 4 1 I 1 0 1 C 4 4 years ra r0 1 ha h3 alf vlf in lamz that 3 80 caa cae engineer 0 districts it gor for 0 D i kumme asked i mitigation on u s om basin ui cu 0 o e raz taz ioe i of o duchesne e ui that kl during cf in gme the amo 70 or i 0 3 referred 1 assigned U vl feels ua u1 it mls dry county 3 flrf lands stated uinta amm the lmo in mooa moon moan division zhe the asked state using report river rights gar for gau and duchesne wildlife further kay thomas 0 1 meld held mele gme the zae anderson water of water dssioner ame the amm county 0 o j c L i e project i i ir 0 0 final e y a anderson aj 0 0 o c aa no e mayor thomas mr duchesne water meen been mema that mr project recommendation possibility of mooz moon zoon coiiv terrestrial since the a ii lam the zhe ui a aj 0 storage 0 4 duchesne j purchase in ems ray emm amm the U these 0 mave have mase times S craig 3 of in U VO alton ll 11 l l & amao that ammo 3 J & 276 |
| Identifier | http://cdm15999.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/WesternWatersProject/id/11351 |
