Record Details
page 232
Digital Collections at BYU
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Title | page 232 State review, Bonneville Unit, Central Utah Project, Final report, page 232 |
| Coverage | Electronic reproduction; |
| Format | 232 text/PDF |
| Rights | Brigham Young University; http://lib.byu.edu/about/copyright/generic.php Public Domain Public |
| Language | English; eng; en |
| Relation | Central Utah Project; Western Waters Digital Library; in when high garden outdoor rough 90 important 0 gol for log ji j i of u draft u deviating i j using w a to it is 0 ea e0 C ta t3 aj 4j costs 09 kj I 1 3 age are arg U to 0 thus 3 aj 4j I 1 C in C 5 estimates s 0 o 0 a k n0 na 0 ja j3 0 0 domestic A 3 11 J allocation J 9 purposes Q V according li l i 6 t procedure U rt fl tol ton chions ctions of continuance ame the amm is to provo tendency relative amel that azas this azam med and mem system is er costs zwas uses and irrigation conne 4050 50 lawn to supplies amm THE dhe cost in bureau mroze arble separable separble wal wat allocated determined zau the zaa determined deporis reporis 40 zhe the sup sep mue cost divided the allocation perform water allocation by water BY azu the dze uncovered states separable industrial irrigation declining on ame the ome mrm are elm between 5500 since 2 0 u the JS fi ai industrial aj 4j W 0 Q v a ani 3 i u i tj wms was wam a u to 0 outdoor 0 fl 0 U ra r4 imm 41 4 l D H Q H e U lua cuz ruz lu3 11 3 X lj dual 0 3 N 3 3 costs 01 1 tel tee aru are mru U 0 iu wt3 mum sub wum zaa office culinary SZ 41 4 1 U u q v 0 O 0 U t developed counteract t M ut 0 a u a that customizing a cu water u u ao a o e w 0 0 allocation cost review have J tl t l 0 water U fl 0 fl gai fal gli ia 3 mam and mck S 0 0 1 I ja what j3 U to been irrigation a 3 E U 0 predicated U c namely 4 3 03 U aj 4j 0 9 aims zhe the costs ta 3 0 DC fol for lol 3 0 o a w s first i costs a 0 o u ja j3 u 0 a 1984 ii i i reclamation reclahation au 0 o practices u a 3 mcd and mcm es ri 0 djs ujs provo 0 to mach such maom c q u 41 e e u aw u 01 0 emm pal lal fl 0 & u ij i j that a u learned LI M ri dem was nes q to b art ant Q rt of ow with aa 4a e unit hade have made of mre are ale future i cj u e 0 a state supply ou u a um 0 0 s 0 lost COST 1 I tel 5 Q U M 3 4 &jjj3 C C municipal municpal benefits J 41 4 1 4 JJ 0 3 u 0 o now 0 fl 3 industrial a j joint rt v 0 munic e e e e us u amo the lmo s ao 52 i 41 mre are awe u 0 a & M 3 which 0 U urs ra r4 3 U U 0 CE B expects it 11 I 1 1 fl 0 methods 3 0 3 sa intent dace line dame washington rt OF tribune S 0 rt ham has mam a a municipal U K is 3 0 o a c 0 acm and mcm a 10 0 ja j3 u is elmul draft wv procedure v reclamation S 0 costs division agricultural establishing ca 3 0 bonneville allocation s e water u in a e aj 4j j to j ame the amm in withdrawals rt 3 ta t3 3 4 t 0 ss BUREAU fd section u a u zoma team lona c and a a mcq and mam a cau aau allotted ij u n aqu the gme j i 0 report questionable 0 u c 0 v s u remaining M 0 ov ut bi as meme lake mese ll 11 1 l u 0 table 3 rf ahe the ame aci fci fl OS lowas costs ul w of 0 V U V klom from 0 existing sti soi t ca izy czi aa fl u e u 3 a e 0 3 ame the amo a mas ici council fr a g a n a ii t onn 0 because 0 ff 0 cd in S of w aj 4j allocation U 0 under 0 O QU procedure rf of 0 U 0 M purposes cao dao etc of of 3 v 0 in CS review 0 A U cpa cp4 J U aj 4j 4 af qf V Q a malt salt mall y cost 0 i method ri irrigation a 3 municipal u 0 e u a 3 of oa4j a T 3 plan a water 0 O v j u i u ao ii i ki then u water u allocation u 0 allocation a 0 aa a& D u 0 o i ai g malo unit mamo c 3 e ac 0 bureau 4 e u u purposes c u 0 llly cost a price a 5 u 3 ij rt u 0 a 0 ki maintain a u ij approval sj extend i 0 L u a 41 u u e a 0 i 3 lase time laso rt 3 u ii i i bla VII dla mentioned amo the gmo conversion presented bureau cost combined mcd and mcm of allocation project definite jordan municipal ame the zhe the benefits bonneville zhe the and allocation feet mab sub mam dhe the over to will loot foot fool project developed of wms was wam review standard that ele are elu amas this amus of is received other water irrigation determined e mcle acre mole KS oa o thu the whe a a irrigations 0 1964 T U modification ame use amo west mcle acre mole it determining questionable sum sub mum office increase purposes estimate remaining thu the nole note mole other dhu the dae fully quality mol per eol this state from a 0 S u on 0 B 0 0 u a 0 j to 0 u 0 gor for lol 0 fi u 0 U u and djs ejs zhe the 4 mas has mam a a mcmumm annual thu the lese lake mese mad and mam delays gol for log of p IV 4 mcm and mck salt irriza irriga trl4jtli1 by assuming assuming feel calculi calcula 100000 zhe the by a ap 1p in ishai ishei salt of mre are ale in project estimated lawns est tho the lmo goot foot to cropland recently ust emt mcd and mcm in lgee free luem over 2000 service urlzt1 ceslav eslav county requirements on occurring million 322 3.22 maa mogo acre molo thu the projects 295000acre of cropland 4500 support of moe use mou according macen study mazes possible mear year semn haw has maw to pvn elz pv1 project of lol per mol manner ammo lake amno excess irrigated special 1 45 4.5 dhe the domestically dlzcclct 45 walm rate waze 203 sach much fdoatures salt irrigated already resources 3000 at the himely limely constructed outdoor about 1980 maler water in of mlo are mgo irrigation by jordan aej anj c11slv11ce is in valued fol for lol cost interest water receiving control in a mae and nam domestic diversions gemme table gemmo 8 alone in areawide mre are ale nomos acres efficiency that reducing keel feel loeu more acre mome be used mre are awe maler water matur wsot west wsol south I to lcrlgillu11 51 zand land an diversions 35000 conversions of ci c is in zhe the 9000 project estimates might L I 1 financed to water mcd and mcm municipal flood county 50000 board omd and omm al a I 1 moun seen woun loan slam kind smaw irrigation zhe the thu irrigation project neter water neler water JOo thu the whe ahe the ame waler water future water somlo years or sojoo ooo jeo in municipal of to federally of As ammo lake lol for gor study irrigation state to 7300 So sojko sardens 40 of geel feet keet aulm dell auml mue due dze undertake irrigation lol for gor malt salt mall in the zhe the year utah between leu the aee and percent irrigation in irrigation willingness purposes contribute gme the is period moru acre mowe little primarily to of of 50 diverted in zhe the requirements improvements addition fall gout feet goul eul per lur indeed wms the gme t lawns ljwns would million of 5000 down ability characteristic about agricultural wms was wam aadu made ammu looz feel of in will moru acre moge of this county a district poecton zau zal conversion olts city 20 repayment cost scaled county ahe the ahu water lions molo acre mogo diversion IV 3 valley 2500 mose some momu gardens lake indicated lion amul majr ahmu system 232 |
| Identifier | http://cdm15999.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/WesternWatersProject/id/11265 |
