Record Details
page 184
Digital Collections at BYU
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Title | page 184 State review, Bonneville Unit, Central Utah Project, Final report, page 184 |
| Coverage | Electronic reproduction; |
| Format | 184 text/PDF |
| Rights | Brigham Young University; http://lib.byu.edu/about/copyright/generic.php Public Domain Public |
| Language | English; eng; en |
| Relation | Central Utah Project; Western Waters Digital Library; 51 5 1 mza 511 gla 5 11 520 20 5 mke 521 5 21 mal 522 mam 5 22 gam 523 5 23 projects actual case effect environment environmen t sem men amm public intermountain in fact projects it in lesson pel per eel watering realizes begin u g before 0 a t oo ual for lau gme the ome c OT u ra amaer water j 3 A lore corp lole s aj 0 a u Environ 4 i a a c u u 10 u a 0 o 0 ts convery bim big mim on oni elk eek i 01 in i an c u u project i 2 3 i utah i i M ea it e it i ame the amm j w 0 o i that 0 o & w a 3 c zhe the c 0 of 0 0 u future z capita a 3 u c 0 small 10 i a was way wms 0 o c j zhe the ahe c this ula LLJ uga w a e 0 lwo two awo 2 because 3 3 loaman county e ro 0 o aj u i ame the amm c plant 10 i E c amut west amul aj i 3 01 FWOC 1 1 4 i c at r M J Q Q 3 0 .0 3 J m ame the amm ome one omm C will 4 of 0 central M beginning C ia i0 C U J 2 to 0 3 ana anz jia participating 0 0 .0 0 3 of 0 army & Q 0 C m 1 mitigated 0010 3610 components zaler water WJ known 0 0 0 scheduled 0 J part L U UA U A U LO valuable 3 L treated Q aj 4j e ali fli 0 C 01 U U aj 3j C Q E 10 whal what 10 in c e estimate S final e ai ame the amm e eart 13 zhe the c D w emr per eel u u 0 o u e 0 ame the amm 0 o would 3 0 mad and mcq e 0 cu u u ahm the ghe j s seems 1 S J 1 01 JJ cal lal electricity J waw water C na n3 amm the gme Q H ezoe once ecoe U 0 C 0 bj QJ 0 3 regions Q project correct 1 falling r 0 dj 2 aj 4j r J 4j aj 4j aj & fa f0 0 4 J 4 N cf ame the amm C X OJ 0 0 0 ti s be u i a m e u of county e a s carbon a i 0 diking olmsted vi uc u ame the amm c u 0 o i 0 e fl kol for gol 0 a i u ia than ns ui 01 0 3 Q i a aj c mye mte oi subsidized o ig e i obstruction 3 U L 0 a in a LI 3 it aal wal just ui ui L zhe the ame f available 0 ig a ra u 0 c 0 o s will 3 io 0 modd good madd 0 be a mew new mez n president IM 5 course & af 0f aj 4j J aj 4j C rya tij kya 0 acca gima wima ajca is ul J amet meet J gallons using va v1 conservation & M or 0 30 that ual uwi l birds L 04j4j L C ul 3 water J aust must auml i must x ig plant 10 projects aj each u 0 S 3 iu 11 2 4 rt ame the amm mot not mol 0 0 u a n 3 3 mi ai rge ige rwe eo e o allm with aulm lo 10 a an ui the hoa how moa 0 c 3 0 o a arid i i amler water emt not mma 0 rt 0 taxes x ii ua u3 SS io aira akra mems less oi a 0 it med and mem e xo to 0 wi water c i 0 ame the amm c so d 10 L rg e aj to v 3 until aj a io a 0 o 0 w ai e very D CT X yr s i knows 01 of a c be a 4 a 10 0 0 L 11 0 0 o a 3 u version m s xi i m e is cj e v CO make lake mame t aa a a to e u converting a us 3 cr 240 3 u s 0 s te system in is e a in 0 o cac can omc io 0 u 01 agg igg report 0 o unfellable unsellable sellable washington 10 CM include anoe once amoe e te 0 so u u ai 0 drowning 3 01 fl a i u e e selm vice in c & ewa eda L gwo two 2 34d u c emery aj i ewan plan u 0 of 0 then without c pozer power 2 ulam from lloa L ti i 0 e i s mumma liest 01 opportunities 3 duchesnea duchesnes chesnes tl OJ OJ C ajj34j wl & v aj 4j 0 5 OI 01 eds mcs C 41 4 l if 01 v L reptiles t fw m redirecting oj 0 0 O wf likewise X utah io u j c fc hunter fl un C eart part earl fl ifliulu projects 0 o e & i 0 0 ig confined Is i report a costliest mad and mam c s opposition u ij a e ui aik gik ai i cj utah 10 delayed 10 c c stu sid siu z 03 0.3 hm mn 0 provides assume 3 geas city gaas 3 mown down 3 i 0 o u animals s e a 0 0 sinae sin5e c ii i i 10 IU 1 W U gwi fat lwi component 0 3 considerably U m I 1 in C M y M waste VI 0 3 canal C reservoir S by 0 si fl QQ utah amul must azul of prices u duchesne 0 Du 3 3 fa a as 0 o these a a a 0 in c aj &j 0 3 now not cow 0 0 o u ais aio 0 o 0 output a fo ai a c u 1 0 oest cost 0 i 0 i a p s j in meca zmia e eca eia mca final oe mome some momm molk fork molm i se s E fl C 3 c i u io 0 a j ao 0 I 1 u CB 0 of 0 is 1 0 0 Q a 0 lo 10 1 0 O u 3 ia ta t0 of 0 report 0 amm the zhe I 1 & 3 1 e thefinal ta be 0 c yi gam two oam 3 LI 0 i a operate L i cu 0 U 0 aj mcq and mcm c aj 3j j j aarm more aale 0 oj u e 4jq gor for kol 0 diking 2 0 1 J V a aho who amo dod not mod 0 1 mase lake mame fl fmc zhe the zge C sections aj 4j i ahe the ahm wl olja oljj ia ii ahe the ahm C S 14 u oce one oae e j u a u i c 0 r 0 miners c c 3 c does oj o J u 03 scaled 10 u 11 losses m e 11 e th guzm city gugy 0 in e ame The amm e oi ooma cost x i utah io who project 10 0 o 0 strawberry s u benefits m ohm the amm CT 0 thirsty sa 3 in ci stable A 0 0 o t a iv 0 be a s oc o amm the age c 0 E demand E i a u a in e io 0 e hopefully e wildlife i OU c drainage e u Q ia i3 i li l i diamond u ui ulof wiam wiar uljf W & L 0 of 0 bridge drowning 3 3 draft ig OJ a f U salt 4 mcs any mcm e ai paying j project & io 0 o those 0 sust must 3 0 0 o 0 o rf a Q & QJ 0 U 0 co zuah with living 11 that ui i 0 o zot not zol 0 u u a to 0 0 S io je sec jec c ozam city 0 ti the c of 0 CQ L 0 0 emge made 0 o x s 0 o mase lake stable 10 e sa construction i w si gazzam county i kloa from klam oa odal coal 0 stimulate 3 f CT u a underground 0 e i increases ili ill 10 1 3 Q 3 LQ 3 0 given 3 aj 3j & U CI aj 3j leu UEU leo reservoir is C UI 0 i i amm the ome gur gli tii ul that of t occurs kilowatt 2 a 0 water lt a energy i by aae one aam c e that ia ai llma from ulma 0 M impact Q aae a wildlife o io a u amm the gme 0 c in i n of 0 u a s LO u 0 u io 0 a oi as oi ai 0 oe o e a vi u 0 o zams loss zamm 0 0 and e 0 c of 0 c providing prviding viding sevier 9 u ale are mrm i 0 c mad and mam c a x L n oul off olg c catus ome the lmo ad i m c fot lot fow ai M relatively salt 0 o M 0 0 o j power s e n i 0 w f i a project aj 30 zol lot moa 3 4 residents 00 oo o coo loo 10 aj u c u projected aj 0 0 3 power 3 encourage 3 cr ao 0 c 0 L 0 11 ru QT Q T io zess loss zemm io e prices u impact 10 0 e a nea new cea a go 0 f 34 zwi zan i consumption saj scj aca aza to & ai 0 i pr ac a the c c 0 o 0 o a C U assumption E OT IO 10 think leay city leas a so 1 0 lo 10 actie ctie Q tj e buah with blam d account 0 e 3 mind a a 41 4 1 ro 0 o and c a 10 attracts i be 3 emcy many emzy 0 o aj a aio ai o only e in e mam dam mae io emr per eel ai io basically u washington s c laying u u ns amler water i u and c ig ev project standard e iu 0 L u 0 o aon a on a zel zek i s j consequently 3 e c a danelle & diversion L J a a i 0 o 0 a gmo the c construction 3 irrigation 10 e kra kaa cs cjs amm the gme c 10 a 0 0 in e lawns s 3 c J u i significant e ui fl ai 4i s 3 i e of t up maj maa u ai of & ai oi aj 0 bonanza 0 o 0 o buying ji 31 11 u 19 jordanelle 0 o melz dell mezl u su with i 0 cause 3 3 mre are mrm sa wi 0 0 3 tho the lmo 0 ahm the whe i eza eja mza 0 should zog not amt 0 lake also io 3 u 0 to 0 o 0 project 3 io 0 10 in c fc io i t it 0 3 E 3 about 0t3 unto into e U Q t 0 0 oe u ai a ams any e utahs io is action u 0 i 0 v c danelle u t w ca u from 0 mcd and mcm c D e 0 S smee keep u of mal Jor hag 0 u t i county 3 migration 10 water ji j i ui bic wic wiz uic ehe the eme 0 o aur our azu 3 u c do 0 a o 0 jordanelle e mave have mame in e 0 o io experience 3 iu 0 a c 0 u m 0 L ui 0 s oo 00 0 o 0 going 0 o mum are wlm 3 u 0 o is ui ai non nan to e i assume wi j loo ooo 0 2 ui e a climate 0 salt i 0 o a no 6 ame the amm e ahan than aman io n j a e airt irt have a 4 basin 1 little w e 0 looser 0 0 o aj 0 if oj iu z CT I 1 0 magnitude ES ame the amm C tj t j 3 u qa 0 o cj gme the 0 o 0 0 let irt lee leta leea irta a sc canals u 0 o comments S 0 O D 0 O 0 m e dmm dam mas io mor Jor mou 0 a 01 0 u x taken xz 0 Q r most 0 0 .0 roj rou ame the amm canals e e lower s mitigated ci u a 00 o oo o i 0 1991 0 o e i power 3 cautious project aj 0 o i transbasin m version 1 lu ea e3 sno sme juab o ji j i io 0 e 0 o provide 0 sections keep u is w of faig L oan ocn and c ezan plan eman fl c 0 f 0 naa zaa aci onzy only zol not cok 0 e e ai lc i mcd and mcm c u ue amat that 0 0 o a 19 u en 0 a lou for lol 0 footnote e rom rum community 3 0a aa 3 i water w e lawns 3 u c gan can laz io olmas trans almau 0 o zhe the c u danelle jordanelle io ael net amt u u M f i mitigation d x c u ame the amm c ii i i c 0 io Q this be sj na n3 0 3 aj L w 0 c the 0 j a reexamining examining 0 o CE in c 11 u ij 0 in c 5 cheaper 0 o u j a 3 ui m s amm to j j u ar 3r alz all azz ui x oj u ui a 41 4 1 the ai 0 u 0 o mas buy mam 3 i Is m gei tii ges jol Jor mol 0 io a s ei e project i because io io these w v me s mams only e aj 0 u increasing ro water 41 4 1 c danelle u u utu en u ja j3 be D 01 0 o i ert aj io magu does ia s sj 0 ii i i s i oa o be a a project prices u u n w jordanelle c that w state v c project energy u a enwer s ual for kar 0 azul must azuz 3 a city 0 o aj eme the emm e lu s t ia i aj 0 will 0 be S 30 3 residents 0 flu 0 0 4 to 0 Q should 3 U 0 south 3 movement aa a3 io re i to 4 S S J 0 w1 wa C be atra aara Q 0 outside V U V engineers C 0 0 that C J r in Q 10 54 of 0 a 61 0 hol Jor mol 0 US 65 completion D small EO must 3 a g ua u3 66 ta t3 mat but mal 3 3 U amm one ade 0 jordanelle danelle C 0 or CO 89 0 0 92 u sam 120 mam e C 3 ame the amm C t u zull will zulz 2 amsl must amma 0 O a L i amk ask j i a i 0 0 e c a 0 amm the ghe 0 o c aj i 0 io i 0 io u khe the cu aja aaa tu iq laemoa impact io u a u b 0 uw demands io 0 aj u LU u project u iu u arizona M mammals s although appears aji aj ari project i ui ii i i CT amter water amler u ui aj aiu miu oiu a os power X state io u wanted e would s oo5ii 0 o ik K CT 01 behind emme page emmo keep oost cost emme page mage emme page unto into page that that make lake mame emme page emme page emmo CTO emge page emme water maae game mmae s 6 seems M QO OS O S khe the amm C S 3 1 u 0 Q ra ghe the gme or 0 IS a 0 uon uo1 0 0 oae one oao 0 C na n3 3 0 30 oze one C C a esc esz nic 0 o U may day 0 o 0 kol for gol 0 of 0 C jol Jor mol Q 5 0 .0 j a ia i0 of 0 & fo a L a 10 0 3 O lo 10 ox L s lo 10 v OJ s gal for kal 0 0 v cwi CLI 1 this what 30 3 0 uo of 0 59 5 9 510 5 10 511 5 11 gla 512 mza 5 12 513 5 13 514 5 14 515 5 15 olg 516 olm 5 16 mad and mam benefits of have will 136 to leow flow seow sufficiency u place f 0 u 1 a zhe the ame a e y oj oj oj iodating radiodating 0 o & ame the amm c L wel wer u a & or ti trad laam 3 la fae fay wells similar u ai 11 11 deficiencies ame the amm e 0 u a benefits a S strawberry 2 3 i in u E utah js e c aj i aj s amael water i a en these u u gather c gam sub mam 3 e m ow 0 u power 3 irrespective a guam from guas 0 u gann wishes y amans means Q 3 in encourage 3 3 u1t3 lake c c 3 i if i u a i f 3 water i 0 a L gme the gmo u taxes x a v K C 0 S regardless 1 3 hearings ram rad lam 2 si 3 u a i 3 E 1 c companies a u ui years 19 10 opportunities ahm the zhe n c a 0 3 a tu 0 rates aza ufa alz iu ac gam gas mam ig u iu cn n i 0 cc c gme the gmo c 0 responsibility suppose & ca co i sai lai saj projects 1 i been zhe the gge e tu Q OJ to 0 oj ii i i c a s fl a id a 0 lake 0 .0 central u C i self 0 a 0 very i utah na n3 C u viewpoint QC Q gme the amm C W happen 0 C 3 ulab from glam 0 U 1 water 3 s 1 C 0 v jo llma from ulma J aspects IU ua u1 aw 2w C q1 qa of 0 0 ll 11 l l 10 be rdo ruo ID be 0 ra include Q lou gou itu I 1 and C M mrs dry mls i i 3 ij a these a a j basin m 0 remaining a correct sa 0 2 u salt property district obligations have line oost cost kol for gol ed on 03 public 4 T ume use wt ll 11 L U U U U water 0 & 0 O & 2 0 v years e 0 o 3 I 1 3 important 1 3 fc water aj project occurring a i electrical acclaimed zow low zoa QH aam aae 0 likewise U 0 would 3 I 1 a lu na n3 project costly during aale paid amle recreational spent c to other s study a scientific ci great na 0 amm the gme u cost i zhe the c facilities s that v 0 industrial this to by these delivered these euge pipe ame the amm conservation wel wet substract be e i a c in c to 0 u what 3 of a zmed need aj Is 11 c amm the lmo e c C moes does moms U conservancy t at t m 0 c & ui oi being a y i mlls very i a 0 s u e B iu 4 C to 0 very c c aj aj oi 0 u 0 ome the omm I 1 a utah 11 1 1 basin m a goes aqueduct m repayment bic siz syz 5ic fl of 0 0 3 money c subject vi c e ii i i i s fl C 9 higher 00 reagans laj lam U during & QJ Q a aj fl u 0 0 o aull will met not mel 0 1 ca and ithe 0 & 10 lo 10 a e e a w eol loo outlawed be 3 a monies in Is lal laa in e w separable i s e i will affect unused Is of m ec e ame the gme c important i aj fa f0 iu a fla fl3 lax tax amm similar distribution been mown down c UQJ 0 estimate S deviation fl a & power 2 do 0 power 2 L to ia a ia u nm in a a oa 00 o0 0 central lc maela uinta 2 it lake much a nat not aal 0 complete 0 S se e power s 0 ac a c or 0 0 S water of 0 encourage 3 10 ai mass loss mams 5 C 5u au be luom from lloa 0 0 a ii tis g 0 o 01 3 treatment dollar e 0 emy pay ems 0 o M be a a a i environs i systems aj a ebe and no oi o i c municipal J 10 have u Q make lake mase 10 y E 01 u f i e 13 c 0 ai project cloning clo&ing u c j 3 a ame the amm utah been u amle were amse X very amere there a a c very i u ould anze 0 o ahe the tt azam with to 0 financing be ehe the production zhe the ghe e property addition utah industrial deficits momm loss mogg contracts gmo the 0 a or sv because should 3 su ai u g a ba b3 i zol not coz utah i i rt tt iu ta m u c e years fg ns i a 0 million 4 of mas has mam is mase lake sh of glom from glam of and contracts ame the amm take j g aquatic ig C q s auml will muzz will t include amm the dell mulm will mezl complete in studies 0 o were mull will muzz a & i 3 aj variance |
| Identifier | http://cdm15999.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/WesternWatersProject/id/11214 |
