Record Details
page 263
Digital Collections at BYU
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Title | page 263 State review, Bonneville Unit, Central Utah Project, Final report, page 263 |
| Coverage | Electronic reproduction; |
| Format | 263 text/PDF |
| Rights | Brigham Young University; http://lib.byu.edu/about/copyright/generic.php Public Domain Public |
| Language | English; eng; en |
| Relation | Central Utah Project; Western Waters Digital Library; 2414 24 14 zot not zol co by require ai and c gol for glam from klam ii to alap 7273 72 73 mumm used 3 10 in that rid mid riu welby through SQJ 0 thats aman than that ia umel feet kmet ai have water supplemental a i 0 e oi a total 0 iu s i municipal u ia different ij u longer cn e i in through maem does mams acquired utah it petition e engineer lago page lamo fl i i report 0 c mr z this 0 irrigation na n3 water ai 11 zhe the 0 eia OIQ eya monre youre 3 0 3 e ai 01 ro t more acre mole numbers 3 omme take omle ss in e 0 u S i w 3 a u 0 8 statutes district maler water alg alu carpenter ii ss to t o a 0 iu e i i ia amzel water t 0 3 utah CUWCD ual for gar without ha h3 water 1 C saem with S ro no ome the lmo J young 3 lu greater 3 3 r p with tull reclamation sm ai c 4 e molm both moah 41 4 1 au 3u fol for lol ow available 0 CTOIOSO water is central to ou maom each na si 0 mow not zow 0 that 0 o eman plan ezaz 0 o 0 ale are mue st s t na io i o provided u aqueduct esk eak fl state fl kli i ee e e ja caig ciig R emmy they emms 11 II on C by storage i ci 16800 eo i 3 z u cu u 3 u u u i 0 c e 0 ja j3 0 10 0 those 0 it FIKING glemm filed 0 o u ot 3 ai 0 0 0 o & 4 io i o oie ame the amm project tho the lmo 1 U U CQITE mait reclamation i 0 O d ul lra laa als lys lym tls mr M ino nno io o ot water central 10 0 filed lt l t liw ist lit l i in T na n3 mr zerm were zele iu U n held u reason n 1 1 amm was zas io 0 municipal U c of 0 i amount ioe som with vur directed called of wra kra tia irrigation utah io sc s c county c discussing 3 c u a that sae sam 33e m somewhat s or i be ui u i project priority m i 0 4 so s c aj io 0 on u reached u a u water te t e i i i this u 0 c a bul but mul 3 0 01 0 ce a ai a i this for 0 su leet feet leel a 3 u that ig definitive difinitive finitive 0 M ai ia ui with irrigation a e s 3 ca ting umm FOR lem be vit vyt OIT OI T U 3 IQ SJ C U la 13 l3 zot zog SOT W aoam OOSO utah utah uzl for c wo oa 01 o1 io ss c i 0 oe weve oae one oam ui vi allotting alloting gme the annually 0 petition c bureau at ome the e of county 3 c no iu i i a 15816 co s should 3 analysis of U U i J 0 0 i U C 01 C i eol met emo H I 1 lor for lol 0 0 alzo allo a NEED into aust must musl 1984 petitions 1 U aele were amle meeting 1 mcle acre mole 3 di 0 been ai ig county 3 BS T oul out ozl mung l of petition smaller qiu ii bucani ucani n 3 ii i wasatch na n3 lii lik ai i storage so c c 0 supply 41 4 1 au 3u 0 M t fb figures 3 C C m bes 3r3 0ou aou 3 1 C recognize 01 C recently that gase have ai s by e before 0 bureau u eyo evo aj ig a c ci cir zir i we 3 an 10 0 0 i or mamle state mamae central amm THE whe petitioning feet mum buy quy reclamation a 22 first age the nge supplemental wasatch have morning on comes els zas its petition this acquisition geu for keu wasatch purchase to petition mome some momo onn ona 0 i to 0 u j filed holders the supplemental original water 3 QI C UJ a tl t l OJ S ual for gar ome the omm meeting and ai 0 zhe the filings M OI 01 moro acre molo L G 3 1 .1 4 the calculated were we county based mcm mad here mow now u ame the amo e i CL a have january nhe age h OC O C D 3 ua u1 hearing S hearing gol for gou oba mre are ale aj this ul 0 0 ns 1 gamzue figure 3 H ic a budgeting a 1 recognizes Z 3 city bf as e 1 water 1 U ron run loto of 0 amat that amal 103 603 10 EC E C wms was zas ba b3 in C I 1 CI I 1 i m cu 0 m 0 .0 te 0 aj io i ai 0 aj J M 0 o i orc 0 o of deah with 0 aie aio axe u for 0 ui ozon kor for kol os c ti t i i that ba ai that t oar our oal 3 e in it i t i & a 3 0 U lo 10 l O 3 4 e these u stock 0 ui orc orz oj c io a we s of a 0 3 been u petition a Q 3 LU ka k3 20000 0 ai m nol not amt 0 companies ya s i i D c & water 41 4 1 aj & aj M figure en ii a feet u s M amm the gme C bureau U v C a ai h n u ii i ghe the gge i 0 gmo the omo C fl in e ai m & i there u wasatch 0 o i ame the amm c exactly u iu false anticipates i C 0 E water ai ca c4 ji j think 3 3. i ai oi cc c c e tn analysis tj io lont 3 0 1 0 0 0 O r project 1 l 3 M e where 1 1 Q presented U companies 0 na n3 io XI U c statutes 3 contract sil shl CITY loz goz s ca aj i 3 0 o 0 amount ow at io u i to 0 co c figures ae 3e number v aois mors mars qois mel met ael e a c u a iu u momm does momu applications petition lol for gor petitions eie ele rie r ie ruu iau ruo i u e s cna cn3 u EE 3 amo the lmo then a theres s moue acre moum project ri r is ual for kar oan can e i special u aca ana aaa anaa eligibility a 0 before o I 1 i agreements so s o s to that 0 0 in e i a i u 0 requesting gme the ame 0 iu ai 0 o u ui u t ae a e u uc 41 4 1 5 13 canal water aj 4j a OJ CTCO 1984 00 0.0 00 C 5 U V 1 CC a 0 an 0 3 Q LAKE lezy city llon 41 4 1 olmer order 0 city it irrigation OS of ghe the gme 4 rth rt3 sms yes sem uc then regard mo addressing released aaje aade comment the in e & in c na n3 mese weve meme u u 0 that 0 o 0 figure 2400 0 a age the gge 01 at ai u ha 00 oo el E water l were aj canal ea e3 area io aade made amme 0 ci that mec mez ore or ghe the gme e file district IT c io ui vi on e c ia gi om 3 a 10 10 eka nia 413 4 13 cm fc assumption u ko IO 10 IUOPOQ u a us otu myo s 0 o aj i petition to 17 e et repayment SALT i aj w in error i ame the amm feete feetr valley TUJ guj purchase cases uti utr VII VI I E in ee e oge the ome e s e 0 o oc available ehm the gme 3 CTH with 3 0 nake lake nale vin qin 4 i ll 11 T vote ina ira rna testimony ujijlit C 3 elij u io being u ii aja do a to 0 0 of o to 0 Q 1 l to ca c3 S lu 0 10 irrigation ra 0 t tj aie air c 4 zda cea zem of 0 moma been u yom you aou boci ooci others s that e aci a czi khe the lmo ci mcd and mcq c ui to i asking waters 0 3 aul qut qul woore MOORE woerm 0 CLYDE 01 C U moare MOORE meare 4 ja j3 l 3 m io a il in a cgi agi april m 0 i e oo 00 0 o 00 oo 3 irrigated 01 basis m we sio C county 3 0 mouw acre moge & let gee SCT turmele turmole S Q testimony sy S y with ta t3 irrigation mls iu urr urm utr available rul 0 o mame have rth rt3 0 0 a salt u e e cqs cs most i morning eau e3u cn 0 o m u of 0 s iua luz s ja c s i this first is mebel heber memer a qut qjt on osa os3 i c i process j sma yet net U gould could 3 mcm and mam c those 0 e g & u a u us by nservancy emm u supplemental 5 fc w on e ai i ceqqo 0 o sa s a 3 t a s others e ic i when c longer cn addition ua u a compliance purchasers s ue dissenting e in c oi o i sworn 0 MR eza SZE ema MR S 3 ss s MR s i 0 o 3 0 o reallocation 0 i CUWCD lo 10 ai 0 t 3 0 Q 01 difference ai io r 0 10 0 mocz dont moat e 0 o i f 01 OJ clo CLU execute U uli ul project i 1 this 20000 0 Q in action si harmony S e e ea e4 certain i i uro uio urn company 0 r 0 io wasatch ror changed e odae come odam E Ss ai 0 must ui er qe ae ui their u hear a this lai cai hasnt m 0 o young 3 than at have total kea sma tos t os a art trt io na 0 U 03 J Q X U co U 0 C S at 3t CM 0 3 le a oais eais u wms was wam me m e J u of 0 iem i c io e ohe the ome M 3 acm and mcm 0 s o oe o io e i ai ue u 0 e o 0 i mcd and mcm c io 0 u no 0 e I 1 in C 3 ns s ais ai grm s gomm told committee frilly in mum six ulm 0 valley alloted 0 lor for lol a municipal u r 0 o i i demands thumb T eael bill elez woi noi rul will u x u Q mel yet net U 0 umm use uge 1 H U 0 2 U & I 1 C 1 U 3 C allotment genious aco cco u c or 0 u f i valley oj u i e 3 & vi wao was wms 0 o i & 0 announced 3 water M L 1 1 ba b3 vi water J S i requested ai ns creek of began 01 least io moue acre moum u n U ajo ox o x 0 o ai mogo acre u 1 between 3 na CUWCD ai 3i ham has gam alm ia zoa not zoz 0 colam north colom u industrial 3 water en safety a ii a io amoy they amos i supply qt aole more sole memed added 0 o u e a 3 heber a a feet u users m eligibility a s ll 11 geet feet ao a o contracted s oti the 3 0 31 3 zhe the age 1 e aga age aq a i e creek a ii 01 u i i 3 water u 90000 01 0 1 e of 0 whe ame 0 o u c li l i an el 3 ro io na n3 t c30t CO U 3 CT gc C s C 1 U U counties bates mulm rule muze e at n i mitigated ia i3 c 0 0 heber a 0 o 3 3 0 0 0 e current 13 request meel deer mmel ame the amo essential 0 as it io c 02 e 0 o 15100 a a & aj T u will in c 0 io guiding g when 0 U C eow now eoa OJ 0 lao gao ajo ljo 1 t31 0 QJ & U r & 3 U 0 O vl 3 tu have 3 mole acre molm than i 0 O amat what amal KCC K CC amm the gme among 0 moor deer mool U irrigation 01 OI 14100 U feet m water industrial i lmo the c io acre utt ut petition of t e ms mad and mam cu almo also c lol for gor ahe the ahm irrigation i snow know ae 2e azaz and ca c3 is aj cn g cu ta t3 i s nuj nua a 0 qoon been tu iu it allotment 0 it als its alm enlarged bemm utah in scoz knew needed be reclamation 3000 3.000 mole acre molm kemt feet kmet company with industrial ma m0 ute moc soc moz so 30000 oa o c mut out mul 0 3 ai a that a cities 4 u a ger for uel 1 0 ro ai a ham has mam i i zam its ulm cites citys that costly C divided river 0 to 0 U 01 rt 11 1.1 lm ml county C 0 30 U have t I 1 amounts design necessary U ditches jrf J rf U U enlarged la 11 l1 of n na n3 3 J 0 which 3 1 1 municipal 11 1 1 LJ ditch J ece os io 0 u a 0 and e mole moye apy mol atle atl e cdc odz luc lu c u 0 o i u osel over mser mad and mam emphasized lol for gor 0 c 0 o francis caie caio zaio 0 molo acre mogo by kre kru iio aj sol soi sai kool feet aj aim elmol other c amoul their ai ai 0 CUP floo flom fc o o u 0 combination e u al ou a filed r 0 o s 3 su cul lul to deficient then j they u c valley of 0 i feet u so table 0 9100 io e mad and mam e ati i 0 o oed oao district i heber a entities gomm less u a moon soon moom 0 llono provo klomm oae oar o ar mu na promised j ina tas vas in3 na n3 emer over emmr lol for gol 0 1 l Q notice na n3 i n i ahm the PETITIONS the 0 ie3 iea at 3t of 1 ncc nc3 i c a 0 supply CLO a contracted i water full anez knez of gmaz than 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 O wasatch ig na ej molm acre moge 3 C zue use zum rt of oa 00 o0 a ago nec wasatch river private bureau 900 6 meem 3000 company municipal that & valley r water J icc fmc igc zhe the age L u 3 ia moue acre moum allotment9100 an 3 0 e ii i i fol for lol gia lka iio iu water u n u zalm like zame eme the emm prefernec rms was zau appear 0 o a a 3 areas ui u i heber cico a ta t3 a2 aa S u 3 a municipal u county u given nar n3r feet u their father prefer 0 as 2s 0 U instead i aoa now zoa 0 allotment i i sj corporation i c och water i 3 zall will 0 o 0 repeatedly wnm AND m too tom io o s u ca c3 e 0 0 0 0 0 57976 0 o 0 s nol not zol 0 project i 4 llomo provo llono 0 mcdonald c amzy many amcy c i cu u reservoir tc the eo v a r s with u 0 o 03 0.3 03 am f 3 c oi conservancy so io of expensive 0 0 o us u age the oge s a decz ua u5 ca 15000 c3 valley another st and c L s 11 0 o m u saj i a t summit creek design it momer heber u divided 0 uloa from llma o j a 0 a 0 o 0 petition lake mas has mam ig u omey they omes a a molm acre molo ora laa c water m gol for wor 0 in oamer other ozmer u se ulc air uir francis e na n3 ja j0 CM calculated of io u uj project mave have mase 0 o somm some momm by when 1 l site ro francis ea e0 C lo 10 1982 ca c0 3 L 0 1 1 emze date U 0 ta t3 0 of PRIORITY amm the gme alz all S fla fl3 12100 0 CT U U 0 tv project gaeo lael SCOO zel aeo clyde sr j14ju & & y water U 0 0 3 bates ghe the ame moor deer mool aole more eolo maa dam mma making clyde in in feet a 0 uc u that c 30 heber 3 o gation ems mes lost 0 in C ua u3 city umma feet u ams any c salt ig 0 Q ce c that e u 2400 CM a this if to emes they emmy ulos from william mumm used whatever ai w u i 11100 irriagation ci t iotis iotih m io ie i e water i feet contract lr ll 11 l l oce one oze C orl ul dechess decress I 1 mumme provo of valley to 0 0 C I 1 utah 41 4 l I 1 its ITI D of 4 io 0 3 t 3 U 1 danelle ua u0 rf u14 0 a U oa 00 o0 1 fo 30 3 0 gor for gou 03 0 of 3 immediately users oj aj arc c morm acre molm LQ jordanelle c aj 0 o L ti f ullum irria allua u ceia CTIO etia staff heber Q to med and mem c t unofficially u 0 ozzy only c u creek e a no 0 ia su io stated lou for lol 0 e i fc valley e i a molm acre moum u 10 i i w mul but qut 3 i i 0 enlarged appear 0 by lanc loze ammy they ames U 3 0 O in ct3 ctr 9 US boam down moze 1 irrigation W & aq rq flaa flqa mlle acre molo U CU 0 george governor S 0 te francis 0 ia i meetings 01 0 ta t0 industrial v 0 indicated u U C io keet feet kmet ai 0 to i features i h oys oii oti mad and co hol Jor mol 0 rij tij reo ree io o u i 0 o u 0 elzor prior eliol emm 3 et e central T asked county 3 chairman diversion i C court 3 ido foe heber 3 u & valley u D 0 s clo ryo i ceo cao zeo a ca c a sti lii sii oo 00 0 o supporter meel deer mmel costs uo 1861 vi 0 15000 0 CT u t budget abio alue ayue aiio vally 1 muma area mumm ls l s 1983 020 030 24000 13 county e aj G ii faa ede eme fa0 1 l zol not zoz 0 it coe coo a J a ea e1 of zas was zam CT 0 0 water 0 possible vi c 10000 4 ajr aj r ui competing ai anna ann anno o s 3 ia i leaked a aa a3 heber t ni r na n3 i ai molm acre mlle u i 0 3 C zas was zam 3 Q 0 O gloms creek alij alia axia hlij meeting i W S U lo 10 l of O reclamation S CM is draft rno rdo igo ig O provo ot ol 01 sn deou mas has mam OO 0 0 in e followed 0 companies aasc assc mcd and mcm gid gru siu ci it lol for kor 0 valley u ti 0 10 i se mad and mam so of j malm lake mase ta a a governor as opposing maa dam mma 4 Q 0 tut tat tuc c aj akk 011 ark arh aph 1 U U u a & L c QO ao have 3 i 0 making marged aarged safety ul el t l than OS 0 emmer heber hap bap emmor heber defic |
| Identifier | http://cdm15999.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/WesternWatersProject/id/11147 |
