Record Details
page 190
Digital Collections at BYU
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Title | page 190 State review, Bonneville Unit, Central Utah Project, Final report, page 190 |
| Coverage | Electronic reproduction; |
| Format | 190 text/PDF |
| Rights | Brigham Young University; http://lib.byu.edu/about/copyright/generic.php Public Domain Public |
| Language | English; eng; en |
| Relation | Central Utah Project; Western Waters Digital Library; 73 7 3 0 should 3 i 0 o 3 0 o 0 o 0 i e u 0 0 c E at a 0 tm oj government c & ame the lmo ms c m 10 s mcd and mcm c i 0 u u include e administrations roe noe roo ro o mcm and mck c of 0 resolution wo oi to 0 a 0 educating na i ai utah 4 0 o developments 4 c ohm the c u u u salinity e is i 10 u and c v problems 0 .0 e i department 1 tu states 10 3 ui 0 o i i protection c 11 basin i oi should 3 cu ia c or o r m mow not eow 0 c 10 10 of 0 3 0 in c 0 0 these ai 10 e 0 oce one c u & sharing L u c mumn sign os information 0 0 o v cr i a c e i sj ao io ic u i 0 N a io C ii c n of 0 elm ute ege a 10 a c ac 0 o i 0 o m c a i citizens c relates rul ruu 0 i 0 a 0 m v aj 4j aj 4j avian power of 1 r of L U 0 aj 4j ie C VI do 0 4 T & 4 qjcn coordinator committees 4 0 mitigating 10 0 10 should 3 amle make amme ID L succeeding u in public a options be 0 .0 0 3 u to 0 c a kor for gol 0 most 0 state 10 3 1 c CTI 3 hydropower 0 aam 0 0 o river lal for ual 0 u 3 u about 0 s ii the us issues ij i zhe the ohe j J 0 development 0 ls l S arts lrts 1 UC U lqis this C 0 Q 0 O locations 3 lor for lol 0 they U 1 production 3 11 rt diking t X geu geo iru participate c u u QS 3 0 m w ot etem ethe otee e e il OE io following 0 e hydro 0 o a a u to 0 0 o u w would 3 01 0 that 10 M M to 0 0 3 40 o j i sv fish wai wei was 1 ot fund ahm the eo losses 0 o moo meo e 0 o i 1 mo of vi i a i environmental c oi resources 3 0 3 & i 3 ean van 01 a problem a c e 3 0 medium 0 ai a m ae 3e 0 0 oo 0 lao loo 100 fao latter w 0 m rol iou ral lol for kor 0 ea 0 s io u 3 adequate 0 w S other 0 mulm site muze a te and 0 o Q s rt c colorado i ii i i ii i i supply ae 0 o elo cco ela informed explored s which opportunity v C IEIC I aasc EI mum arm mua C i 3 adamsite damsite in review m oye oie med and mem or s 0 bi ai 0 0 e that 10 3 0 mcd and mcm been m 0 QC io 0 wor for wol 0 resources 3 0 .0 os include 4 e fl 0 o i M a usa vic uia na n3 idt iut rut 0 3 0 n funding ot aj 0 u emm dam a harvey u the c 0 e i 0 basin m Q c x t Q e s c 313 at co a tn would 3 uj a il allocations 3 fl point Q ta operation e ai aye aie Q e 3 plume prime ta an g lew few including 3 0a aa 0 amo the lmo c y u 00 0 development 0 ai uu 0 m glom from 0 0 on 0 wai kaj taj t 0 vi Q 24j these Q 0 fl Q mee see mem Q water U 43 wildlife ham has ig a another U a t u lel CUP gel 0 o protecting u u storage fc ghe the gme ahw the j i a ui 0 o a i e mre are mrm i mot not mol 0 0 of lt 0 o t as 0 o a a c a c 0 facilities vi j a 0 so io fl e e 0 u of 0 3 a 10 io 3 danelle 4 0 o a a river c tuo to 20 mitigation & ei based v 0 L C c issues w s dorothy v recommends J 0 i in e in et oj vi cue CUP lue 3 tu a J 19 c vi ui natural 3 0 on 0 ui jordanelle 0 o W i i u e parties a mi oe starting irto 0 ti mol nor eor 0 mrm are ale i e a 0 dliferesources iu is i 0 o state us 0 alt clt L ia t & a what a L ec this e and e 0 o v another ix 0 o w n L 0 determined 5 la states JS eo tue tum ine lmo the aio mls fle lu 0 public & 4 in e education 0 o mo mol Jor hol i a t u water ij C 0 io vi aio ai aso o j ame the amm 0 rt taxes x c 34 m a j ec e age the dge c L kol for gol 0 thereof iw c ai M a ia v state m me1 mea w c at io 0 o oc restoration s lqis this c s 3 vu aba azo abo o3ii enli agriculture interest 0 o problem 0 o colorado u of obligations IB of 0 fish 0 of O ig rela aj hi 0 1 a ui comments g zhe the ahm j t c TIU C U m mcd and mcq e oo 00 a mon oon moa 0 of 11 i w M their a ie 5 amm the lmo c w ima IWA lma s OM O M by WO e M 0 o i j in 0 understand v 0 o gor for 0 amm the lmo c 0 mo m o 10 0 i fund e 0 .0 recreation 10 at xt c 00 0.0 00 ao m i w io 0 sc acm and mcm e ii i i development 0 i m u i u e as palt part it in e 3 in w be u following 0 01 basin oif oiw a a aj ame the ome e 0 o 10 tc kinds a opportunities 3 na L wil wit mil tu TCTI programs 0 0 F u w i i co gomm done eone e v review TWO OO 00 wor for wos co vi a i 3 c 0 to m losses ui ot u ca an e 0 0 o a m OI 01 C L II 11 0 i e ig a of oo 00 o public o i 0 o i c c ert ao to 0 of roe 100 rue ruh rub loo comes needs ne ame the amm ui ail akl of sa s3 0 assure 3 iu on 0 tn 3 0 c 00 oo 0 TO affected U 0 fl aj akl ajl 0 fo C C 0 art qrt costs vita vit3 OJ of 0 magazine fo VI Q OU OJ 3 teeth u v basin wi v v ohe the ome oa c u process T foo IOO 100 imo development 0 M OO 00 v iu loc goa ios a ai 0 o ti a ea be 0 0 ojo eju oju e mot not mol 0 0 u facilities i 19 ai ali mib i 3 e ia 31 3 1 additional i recommendation gj related ro 11 1 1 0 .0 ca or st s t lol for kor oo 00 khe the zhe j t having c i e parl part palt se financial important s cu ai e solo vote moko 0 assure vi zai zar values of 0 io ac funds io of to 0 fl being QT ig fl 0 mitigation 0 o u u to 0 w 10 0 O e ai a administrations 3 4 0 fl a ongoing 0 oc ornat ocnat agreement u do 0 u io 3 io ui e ota enn ot3 wildlife 0 o 0 ie gohe some v ai ai vicc vifc secretary ai j special oua oma szn sen zen E a 00 oo 3 e to 0 division 0 0 0 o u reduce continuing 0 moser river J ale are mlo ta tui ui a a e tit rit ait iit to 0 ai ai m OT C giu gru tio roil roi monies of 1 C U U u0 ua review wam nae TOC ame the amm 0 in C C C OJ & 14 I 1 4 method 11 ll l X elss 011 else ets els S 0 c 0 aj a t needs aj laa caa c i mak maz acet cet 0 ai fc fol for lol 0 e i 30 otai c a S habitat ai 0 ET a m a c ait aie an 3 0 information eo lu pul put 3 3 0 0 o vi Z agreement u public 3 c a mo oi an 0 o c i 2 t consequently 00 o oo o UT 13 s E si kl 11 .11 1 1 mcd and mcm e ta t problems a 0 0 o 0 o io these ai u iu u ig 3 precedent ai on 0 roze role loze 0 3 glow flow 0 e location iv v to m ja j3 c legislature 0 0 scientific e m ni a 0 i 10 c e i zhe the ahe 0 0 31 i about oriu u u c 1 3 m submitting i to 0 0 colorado s a oi representatives c ahat what ahal 10 v gup CUP lul 3 3 i a u problems 0 e paying responsibility v lol for log 0 opportunity andor 0 o this ec e c E separate s ar quality w e mrm mem ore sources s6urces t u a i c s okum offs fl js 0 v i et s oiz u i ui a 0 a 0 fl as v raj oom rtj ome the omm fulfill Q continue ii E 0 tt na n3 0 0 U fl v fish 3 tu U 3 so 0 0 o basin 3 of u vi their a 0 e 3 t v r aj 0 u kra kaa CT a succeeding a sa 0 0 0 ia 3 a 0 e c i 0 m oc o oze one c y i u om ai 1 en olmer order oleer 0 o u i 00 oo ogo ago oso this 0 3 w tradeoffs ni instream stream 0 a 0 o 0 cis iii cli cum oue iu e ghe the gme 0 io a 0 t su a 0 terrestrial v u E interior u ulos from lloa 0 decide uj opportunity oi o ii i i m wi4 wib facilities 1 1 4 M support qj aj aks its ulm is geologic ai 0 j atu 3 u i iu 0 o s of trade a T ui 3 in e c contract a state lo 10 ic ai ui 0 water u 3 t ahm the ame C 01 ol O l e 000 county monthly bimonthly as of tu of to OOO ls information In C 00 U 3 W C resources 30 3 t fl ol 01 io in 0 wildlife io i o e eo e o a would a n 0 a gli guv i serious 19 0 eo assure 3 ii 0 s 3 i mma IWA ema 3 oiz ois otz 11 mo U memorandum loz roz loc mcd and mcq C OE CL 0 it locations jt u 3 U m 1 l I 1 about 0 oul out ozl 3 to 0 4 ir i r in co rio ifo iio ozo 2 0 i in 0 ta a 0 o assume OT v 0 o m 0 o c 0 ao a s i included 3 0 of development 0 e c fully 0 o the cn v uo u o ai M 0 o amm and mcd ece dze bi O Bs 0 well ai mcd and mcq c and e sios bios eo would 3 i go an e 3 M in c 0 mcm and mcq e ome one omm c 0 .0 10 a 01 x 0 o 0 o v s med and mem c m u n ia 0 io m ote a 0 fl t u nation c j io i i i e zu s format e i ai oa 01 o1 timing e ahm the ghe ai c as io lu io or 0 0 laa kaa trn tnt 0 n iu ic e 1 1. 11 ui ia ui baz ose bam of 0 io i o i ui u i e as io 3 i recommendations establishment uj aquatic io alz all other i be zot not zol f under 3i ai a secretary agency representation parties a this waler water s control J establishment ujsm serve as informed environmental a providing a their mae one mam 0 of involved in other supplies v of taxes 0 benefit t the state supplemental sy well as 10 ahe the ahm state h of natural 0 monthly S ahm the ohe public amm the gme in in carrying review hazardous compact 1 2 3 4 elmul draft nale lake indian 71 7 1 72 7 2 by last rist valued of maong among kmet feet umek mitigation agencies rivers system dost lost resources 0 dhe the whe c along c obligation a project of offs governing public supply koz tou goz appropriation 0 0 o a obtaining every as instrea system ui gol for kol 0 10 a wol act woz u i this recreationists tradeoffs water loal four goar agreement aj ot & these appropriated protection agreement trade this welz well annual mulm life c 0 m e mole acre molm zand land zamd kozl four waterfowl 0 gor for gar 0 0 wildlife areas ame the gme zabs laws C 10 ua u4 0 alone of an 10 zagt just in discussing 3 zemm team u an C resource collection f 0 0 of amm the 3 vi J 0 o as this 44400 valley of oul our ozl coordination c 0 purpose 0 flow 0 or officials j neglected v u and ie particular mass days maym billion about in 0 U had ia i0 in 10 mitigation 0 dollars io of 0 0 o waterfowl river 4 d quality ame the amm of campers en 3 a med and mem 0 0 0 angler 1 bring habitat hours interagency bureau ahm the zhe heber 4 acquisition UI mew now meb 0 water terrestrial as no division 6 this construction utahs instream stream understand process a elected u have J emus this c oi ta t3 zhe the ahe c 0 .0 mitigation 10 c e co 3 2 iu u 3 t 10 0 n and 0 of In sme man amm in rates io aqueduct c m a service lor for lol e 0 B 10 khe the J to fulfill U CT ha h3 kre are kle 0 u who c of implementation khe the khe the 0 O U C L ranch 10 ai v on of zot not zol TS of 0 of zhe the dhe the dmm W L 165100 165.100 hikers of eart part earl eart part earl effort trout although advertised advertized to project 0 recirculating power U zost lost smith there by management dollars memel spent gemel wildlife behalf of do wai taj appropriation tai a their ir gme the eme T 0 c 0 of unique of historic 0 no 0 hundreds C apparent Q partially diverted loxer power of strawberry y mul but qut zand land wildlife no on emmy they emms bet get mel administration construction mitigation zoss loss lomm hunters years have mcm and mcq is to zas was zam lalk fork lall mcd and mcm 0 preferred to lawr emer lawl this & 0 and 0 o mas has mao 0 million and implementation that ome the omm to s contributed a a u uj u amoc then supply amm the gme it state wero were wele mitigation amm the gme lu 0 O 3 0 3 a by were of still water at aho the lmo grouse of usfish Fish operation agreement 600 fish enough of keeping th rights have fifteen OJ 0 studies ta t3 oi mal but mag 3 g pumping 0 E of 0 sagegrouse 0 t iu 0 mase have mane m 0 aj ui gol for lal this 3 diamond e of IU ac 3c M US U 3 uninformed 4 water understand S ic la s on c c 0 sage oi 3 0 constructed 1 n lor for lol 0 ai c ig ai ui avels evels 50 0 we a m zeam team amma 0 o oi 0 o 0 0 0 B & a 0 i the e a 2 0 o aj a enjoyed 0 u 10 we L though oi a 10 fm vi vi io i we 3 ja c e u on annually dollars of a 0 0 o i 3 a a 0 CO 8 L C L 0 o 3 used in of io a 0 o 3 i we resources water c intended e m 0 c s i acres i gol for kol 0 0 io ai 0 v resources 3 zook took laos only la m zhe the c c construction 3 wolms j s e tu deferral u to used v do 0 o manageable oi 0 i 0 S 4 ui iu 1 0 o iu 4 so later flow 0 3 0 o vi lol for gor 0 zol not col 0 m all mel wele were welm lemas reams enough even of costs mrm are ale 23013acres beaver section met yet sel funds be what habitat it u m ra cu 11 as 700000 23013 management cn il obligated CT 1 amm the lmo C compared been mrm are ale 0 just VI do 0 O & 1 at concentrating to a w 10 these u e I 1 protect & L u 111 11 1 Q ja j3 or 3 i recreation where r TI resources a oi c citizens a gmt yet gel ai 0 laj gai a sai years BI after a i instream stream 4 ui i 91 purchasing c u iu mad and mam zmed used emy pay ems to 0 csi asi emer deer emmr t 10 c zenor under zenol s mot not mol 0 e of 0 ham has in development bho who dho 0 S CT c who 0 s 3 emmar their emmal 4 4. a c c 0 this u 3 utah ig to four in effectively flows mol not cot construction to soae some bome acquired mcd and mcm river palt part resources e making e of 0 mitigation c officials in of waterfowl whose ozl our oar so 0 U IU fol for lor 0 aasved asved consequent els elk mls lol for gor tribe million satisfactory citizens citizens hu a 10 years mrm are ale s 0 o 0 ai 0 0 of u moles acres these kor for kol were u io u uo u o aj io 0 agreement interagency of this mol act moz 500000 0 aj a lol for kor U 0 O lou for kor operation fo 0 O fo duchesne OJ rms was ram fo t i protection a a u elected u resource oo 00 o 3 o u of needed funded fishermen W res ITS fes amey many ames V rivers is 0 o 0 required a 01 0 e being 0 i o oost cost 4 bureau co i 0 provided indian ml ol 51 5.1 biological 19 no utah they 3 utah ac uj i 5000 dollars dollars a habitat habitat moles acres saml yede name uloz flow 0 a aj gmal cant e 3 u S io after ame the amm why zhe the gme 0 0 by ja j3 of 0 of 0 0 01 mrm are kle 0 at 0 whe the ahe c 0 o kal for car 0 as mte ute mae khe the zhe only 190 igo C |
| Identifier | http://cdm15999.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/WesternWatersProject/id/11012 |
