Record Details
page 170
Digital Collections at BYU
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Title | page 170 State review, Bonneville Unit, Central Utah Project, Final report, page 170 |
| Coverage | Electronic reproduction; |
| Format | 170 text/PDF |
| Rights | Brigham Young University; http://lib.byu.edu/about/copyright/generic.php Public Domain Public |
| Language | English; eng; en |
| Relation | Central Utah Project; Western Waters Digital Library; 24 2 4 L water a J ame the amm we C 0 C glos from gloa program progran 0 10 of 0 & L in a 0 2 wadz will wudl t u te e u m i en water M furnish e 0 .0 ai en C I 1 C & 0 U 4 L Q 4 C C taio t3io 1 utah 1 l S C S C & i 401 10 0 0 to space ia i0 of 0 of 0 1 tosu tozu io SD 33 Q i economic 0 ai basin 11 oia oij oya of 0 zhe the e u plan andor Q be u musor river 0 of 0 utah diking flow 0 0 io development 0 o e depth a eaber power S 0 o e T location 0 Q 0 o goja goa gna Q until a S c 0 3 e u to 0 i providing 0 u e 0 03 malz unit mazz e c i 10 e e L cr c u 0 o diking ol 01 01 ol exchanged 0 o omas this 0 a umes uses a u 0 o 10 an a 03 0.3 03 am 0 a e 0 o 10 iu ai part 10 to 0 10 s laa caa rf e ai reservoir i of c c med and mem e m 0 u water on initial replace program 0 m e u in 11 u 0 developing & a 0 on u ai io s oo c 0 diking delivery v amo the lmo j ix 00 oo o a c an 3 river 0 0 U 3 IQ 0 creek iu arrangement 3 storage oum ene aioo ioo a klasa provo llama 0 0 or ai lc rights OT F 1 return 3 3jc ia i0 a i power B 3 ajo aim aio ai o viable 0 o proposed os ast ost t county c e 0 u s i oct mcm 0 o ra u os oul out ozl 3 iu provide u io 11 as a 0 m 0 construction i a 10 water ii i i u 0 tj 3 04 ui vcl acl C 3 lai 0 o oe o e a be m obtain na n3 losses tn 0 ome the ame io c provides U 0 0 0. aj 4j 4 of 0 0 o based t & ca c0 & v as 0 0 00 through C OJ OJ 0&4j & t L amme than t33 0 ai 0 m water 20 qi an soat laci proposed io mol not eol 0 e t 1 planned c amm the ome j u i a 3 0 o 0 0 industrial i a hydroelectric 0 o u c convey c as io 0 o io a v 0 o ta t3 ome the gme certain e j iu ror rur io gme the amm i CTOO through to OO 00 may bay mas diking mewl deer mrea area muma of most a asel over amer amzel water danelle mad and mam to considerable to K so colorado e u a io aeu cao aso 0eu i ao 5o 50 mase lake male LO 0 4 u 0 ai 3 & & jordanelle oc4j exchange s i 0 through 0 c io 0 presently oj u 0 & aj 4j a is tts ats permit j io i developed r ui of 0 will u 0 gor for gar oo 00 u m v 0 tt t t county e vi to nase lake fork 0 0 o m cdc rde iu ome the omm e i u mamle state io e CTI maam site muze u u & carryover is a x n iet ret of zhe the c support 0 s x i ai water w e zmed used i leomo provo 0 3 li a hydroelectric considered 0 o giu gru iio ne n ame the amm e 0 lake io 0 0. temporary 0 i m emze date emlo make lake mase i 0 0 hol Jor hou 0 ai af losses w 00 oo or to 0 iu 0 O vi ai storage S 1 1 salt qt carry llm allm L 104 it 0 3 t water 1 rt evaporation S 3 0 U 0 a 0 Q 0 vl a m 0 S there U mie mte eiat3 C uta ut3 IC I C D fl U L ig 0 0 w e amm the zhe 11 1 1 ew northern maa dam mma ibm ec iu u a owners c utah m vi a in e ual for gal 0 x a QV be 00 oo a 0 uita uit3 i u io 0 vq aq is rul would 3 4 ms xo a 1 0 o OTI fao iou rdo ig 0 and e diamond eo of is 0 o 3 0 U 3 0 utah 00 oo to & aam was amm a agreement a 6 utah 103 purchase e modify 0 o nol not col 0 aqueduct m vi c modification benefit u a s s c supports 0 constructed io report c i ai hat mas ia a am 2m 0 0 u QC 3t3 ao a o 01 a to 0 e undiked receive a lloa from uloa OQ Q oo 00 10 r 0 o i 0 i 0 o at ia u s in e te 0 t this e a 0 o m u 0 S i 3 3 ua u1 tc conceptual U U C L 14 & ID C OC med and U reservoir i 3 ulc & luq ja j3 U wae aj additional 4j 0 U 2 S C 0 aj USBR ii i c being ro amm the ghe c 0 danelle u emam data ot o T io uu be reservoir & u g c u u u 0 to 0 u stored 0 0 o 0 o Q u s residential 3 3 mamle state ia i0 in c e 10 0 tu c i co c o 0 ome oei zee o that ei water which 0 3 v zhe the ohe i i emms does emmo oj available c i oe reduce 3 ao 0 i Qs x us ao 50 5o additional jordanelle ia ve v e int irn if constructed i aj ao a o ta t3 j MT 0 o 0 water io an eto et ete o development 0 oi aj megawatt a 0 o review us 0 o m reservoir reservoir i s vs ace vce amzel water amaer and e c i lo 10 obtain io 0 io c U ia u vi 10 e water te the olt olg amma team nemm be is klom from kloa 0 i iu at would 3 amas this c basis w u in c io 0 it wasatch 0 o be a evapotranspiration rt edan plan ezan 10 ix m 11 should 3 0 ai int roh aha m a i 0 o mol Jor hol oq o Q ui tn e 0 i io termination c c a s r yiioa e ir economical s i mc m ame the amm c 0 S e & amm the gme e 0 o io ai iu alt ait unit sa s1 of OF 11 f 10 0 io lol for gor 0 0 0 oo of ai s available ass asa oss e 0 0 u C U E 3 ov t 0 c m be elevation ns 0 o us S D u & i ai agreement ua u3 w danelle 41 0 & io 0 o io to a 0 u would 3 0 0 to 0 of 0 eo 166 3 ame the e at 3t as lol for lou 0 age the zge ao a o H ai reservoir i ica i ca u e i ec that a to 4 oo 00 o o u 0 u 0 supports ai e a u ti review aqueduct 04 0 4 aqueduct ta t3 of 0 water amm and e i i ac a this C ume use umm i a u aai axi 0 oni is jordanelle 4 acquire 3 program 0 recommendation cu i ome the omm c s seu geu iau nemm need u oo the c basin m u u a us s a ig L CT h 3 ui in so 0 ia oo 00 E a ao a o io a project 3 i a a na n3 a oa 3 in e 3 0 o fcc dec ucc lyo jyo vio v project io temporary m u sc in water water i a e 0 quantity i an e irrigation 3 decision irr vrr ca otoe south 3 zeed need zmed at nae nao sa U 0 0 Q t mol Jor hol 0 modification 10 0 0 of tm m M u so may bay mas 0 c na oi t in c & transfer ut j iu t U mma CTO ciuc amat that mcd and mcq c maa dam mma strawberry sa bonneville 5 0 u 0 x s proposed 0 n 0 co ia benefit iu u fol for lol 0 C D U amm the a c c m e i rol row o a eyu eyd 0 o a require 3 4 a u ot of ome the 3 j sa e u i 0 o 3 C D c component 0 ic c 41 4 1 i oia reservoir of o f e e ito 0 M io a 0 0 t study 3 io i o il ii ch Q moving U a ao a o a ot io c c 0 o gleek creek aj iv u ahe the zge e Q unit s y 0 o ual for gar 0 of 0 i with 413 4 13 ai ai construct i 4 stated io eo gme the ame med and mem c tt exchange c 0 county 3 alternative C i aj 3j a g L 535 w actim achim ui provo os vi t change bonneville crt wasatch io KS 0 s yi 10 e leq ueq 0 3 maser river masel u lu specific e iu ia ir 0 io muze site mule a u c i facility ui tn wasat vi u is studies 0 o u io a x u i c cc t a 10 0 management ci su u v cr c saving r N U a equal 3 uo gor for sa soi aoi sai amwel major i C ll tic cic whe the C C 0 mulm site muae ili i li 10 10 in C to 0 & 3 such 3 umi IMI uli of & on 0 lou for lol 0 whe the J 10 teams ia i0 03 0.3 03 am construction C supply Q plan io OJ 0 weam team wmma ia i0 ia i0 in c u u 3 ui 3 ai u ai ui Q oce a will a M c a vi so Q lo 10 e suggests oi of u mamae state io H C E 0 o 0 m io As t 1 river uey euy 0 gie gre lio 0 o mmel deer mger ai 0 a3 aa 0 10 h 30 tn recognizes mych 0 ha r ai c in mca 0 a zim cim aia cc there ai momm utah 4 a a e S v rt m fl 0 3 an ci bas bay mas io a 10 ooo OCO zoo 1984 zhe the 0 to OH omm the gme the C viable lo 10 lo 10 to jbf jqf 1 lol for gol 0 develop U 0 13 C suaso provo 0 0 danelle 1 oll ill oul D that IO 10 is S provisions a 0 U v oya olo 010 ovo 1 2 environmental 2 plan an need reynolds can ctn i ai 0 a ame amm h elah utah 11 1 1 e n 0 o a L 0 o u c u sc ts 0 rof row a 01 c t tjoe aio tjom aja tjo e excellent acs ggs fcs ome the uie uve amis this s a 0 u D reservoir t delivery c omm the gme ec available ai jordanelle m e recommends u review u u 0 unit ctr ct3 i diking ehm the eme j u review iu such 01 M ai e efcc efcy 4 i present v ca u i mt mai maa i nyo nye iio project i i o 0 better nase lake nale s 3 and c mul but qut 3 ame the amm 3 a that 0 O U plant 0 O plans 10 such U wmma that 0 south 3 that 10 sumna provo 0 3 0 m r north L amle make amme aj 3j IO 10 0 L OJ J 0 U io Q that io 0 O awa SJQ aua 11 aj ta t1 24 r e x to 0 at i 3 0 i io to u aj 0 io in ee e amm the gme e io hol Jor mol amm the gme aj and e v cej cei 0 agam team 0 o 0 0 o 0 CM OJ adf adv f Q fo m h VI ha h a bua bau asom acom QSOZ 4 OQ QC IOJJ jc the 4 U U to and C of tu A C 1 UJ mas bay io mcm and mad C hk D SO 0 a sin s in 5 ahm the ame j ulah utah roen ioen io a nale lake io lake 0 o whe the ahe i approximately nho the amo e u v i 0 o d a e f 0 jwj j2j h x e i iu 0 3 0c ac B 0 I 1 t in temple october page fol for lol provo south require make lake male ezah review ezah utah elam county within greater benefit 22 2 2 23 2 3 lmo the 4 ii tiz liz then e e u DJ this ui eart part fue fam 100 10 QH in 0 a within e e med and mem 0 e fl ulo its zao of 0 1 aita ait3 reduced t u 3 0 o u a nol not 0 water i 0 u o awo two 0 0 to o u agreement a mii sii eky a U increased ia u ua u reduce u a 3 a results doo ino dom 30 11 4 u S 11 a power i or y v u CL C hg 0 o ll iu dud or S 3 a 0 U klam time ora erm emm or0 kat kaa described 1 m be mao wao k 136600 0 o 0 0 M 3 this parties aad and mad e m Q most 0 u 0 is L i i 0 a 4 participated u u of t 0 negotiated 1 i a e us serious bonneville u of ularm store 0 c o of feet lr a 4 s e & 0 c 0 c 0 provide oj & u u fc u y mrm are mue potential to 0 a t would 3 t yc y c u a i w u bonneville dju dru aj be u aj 4j Q i ou M umel feet umea u feet u aj c fc S i 1 kal for eal 0 jc iq industrial tf t m f L utah u Q project u the c 0 following 2 Q u v aj 4j c strawberry aj Q vi u u water u c kwet feet cu c 0 first ui i e 1 u aa a1 aj vi co 0 c 0 aag efa era afg umm sam uma iu jointly c 0 2 utah project iu s entitlement completed m eo e o io i flows 0 lieu tn a 330 3 electric ao 3o 0 e io a CL x 0 cim zim a a na i i a 10 80 0 molm acre moum u 0 zhe the ahe e 30 3 o u i unit T fc S ca could 3 CO 1 5 vi OJ samee yield U U it t taj ttj to & C 0 gme the amm c i zhe the c urta urt3 a in C U OQ lou for lol 03 Q requirements i e u 0 of 0 u 0 ur 0 19 o lre lne iio ue streamflows were a sa sio ltd aj agreement a aj proposal 0 qu molm acre moum t mole acre molm u i zic ziz ai construction 3 an 40 4 o 0 water 0 i ue U e regulate s aj gme the ame e moue acre moum u aj xee sec xem se in ame the amm c io 0 o io create 0 o iu to u Q ual for gal o 4 a i 3 stream mil oii myl 0 a i i nephi e 0 sa s3 and e a of ahm the cr U CT i i i jointly e n i to aiu ziu s 1 ame the amo c ooo o lol for log 0 in va v3 s 0 o amler water e vi 0 e u 4 r a oo 000 aoe 4 an zhe the zge j U a at 136600 a m 0 0 o n si 0 x u ui kmet feet atsie adnie 27 ute wie o 0 0 u 0 o report i a 0 canal 3 agreement a mue are mum naoto naot3 of in lands e n feet i u of iu 0 o a u review S bonneville ui by a i s to utahs either 4 i to quantity e 15800 0 co act sme see ict 1980 si ai i a ee e ame the amm ajo e 27000 oo a 49300 iq i 0 Q reach io mul but qut 3 aade made amme bat b3t of diversion t u 0 zear near zeal na n3 Q L a of 0 to i i a oi e a 0 io 0 resulted u second oi r mel eel onzy only i 1 OJ C qa Q u cna cn a 4 i so a a approved 0 0 3 3 who m 0 3 amler water i csi asi ur C supply a unfeasible i ex tc te a x i c c & 0 e supports 0 water C u mcle acre mlle j basin rt 0s as fishery in e rt na u 3 0 QC Q gme the C 0 o of feet 0 QD m airt irt february 0 u oj a i aea new ama u u 0 Q 0 as t mum are mlo siu liu sig fo u an 2n constructed s by 3 a st be aw a e s 0 o draft ig uco a Q of qa i 4 D Q 11 1 m i 0 ui airt irt 4 0 u o 3 reservoir 1 ai fishery cc U fishery IC OJ c c 0 agreement QI QJ i 0 i I 1 t quantity W ct C gloe from uloa S 0 kole acre kolm u construction i U 3 company c t a m a s jamae state 41 4 4 iq 1 zhe the u 3 v developed 0 01 1 u U so 0 OT 0 0 C m U ua u3 0 0 i u oges this parties i u of r 0 ls dagmr other ae a lom ich UT e oe c nge the ago u kmet feet abc ajc u another i 0 v 0 co c o U nol not 0 e a i gake make gale na n3 ai c 3 aqueduct a fl w in in CTU molg acre moug effort 0 nl basin lat laa to t O leo keo l go coz not net 1 il it future 3 construction 3 136600 river I 1 na n3 ual for lag 0 i I 1 C U UOIS U omis OI water S ia reduced 0 C sa 30 3 2 diversion i 0 o aoa aaa 3 0 uhll 0 3 wuu guu portion 0 o w m total t oe o wh e diversion io mels fork uell oze oce mcd LL fa u ruo rdo to u transbasin ui a 26000 0 ui c i state 0 o ame the j of 0 ii system t 0 facilities choi cnoi that na Q dated 0 sa s v molm acre molo u by been i ai 3 would 0 3 S uke ulz io lie 0 s zam the lao co vi uu3 uuk 0 mul but qut 3 i be ao y qo 0 i 0 a ue u ehm the e vi umel feet ai oa o a 1 l s 1 l likely u flao fl3o co trans io water M M u Q eo i ahm the zhe a water llono provo klomm 15800 this light of in mad and mam a of be oi jordan i the ss stream of a gog for strewn transbasin basin trans w parties to m positive ui a elop de 0 proposed w irrigation 0 provide age the gge lou for gor power & concept u review rui tui forth construction 30 3 modified as o supply to present I 1 the i collection elah utah elam to io these u average ede edm ige colorado amm the recognized oitt oit if leml feet agreement t develop additional in 1964 releases 1 transbasin basin trans mc mode acre mamme 22300 to diversion mas has mam that would this 36 available also diamond in additional fao kko m KI eme the emm C of 0 1 na M 0 O i to 00 0 complete 00 0.0 00 ea 4 fc i ai U s 6500 6.500 ln i 0 Q s aai aii e ool set mma aj u 0 ce fishery e oe u i would 3 u o in ai o oae one oag c 0 iu a water ig ai ta t3 0 3 to 0 ai i c u vi 0 o ezme plan emme 0 e o i u meet 41 4 ai 1 0 D a construction 3 0 o evi avi 0 is acre i u 1 a jointly io i e o na n3 0 lal laa ya y3 up 3 basin laa urt se s which e in c 0 s i oa i 3 S S ahe the ame wll all 10 should 0 eme the emm e identified elah utah meah g to 0 district ui u water lo 10 aja SU lea lma u amm and C io river annual C kwee from awee S OC fishery of 00 001 mei mer l ba b3 aqueduct O S lu 0 facility 4 0 C acl 3cl azu aqu zu i o 3 0 t C out lut available i 0 a i u c transbasin of offos oflos ui construct |
| Identifier | http://cdm15999.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/WesternWatersProject/id/11006 |
