Record Details

page 4-5

Digital Collections at BYU

Field Value
Title page 4-5 Diamond Fork System Final Supplement to the Final Environmental Impact Statement, page 4-5
Coverage Electronic reproduction;
Format 4-5 text/PDF
Rights Brigham Young University; http://lib.byu.edu/about/copyright/generic.php Public Domain Public
Language English; eng; en
Relation Central Utah Project; Western Waters Digital Library; results of public review of the SFN DEIS dels main conveyance aqueduct with loafer mountain tunnel and monks hollow dam and without SVP water conveyance MCAT MICAT 2 comments on the SFN proposed action MCAPDFT MCAP DFT and the main conveyance aqueduct with diamond fork tunnel alternative and without SVP water conveyance MCAPWDFT MCAPW DFT alternative were screened to eliminate those comments that dealt with the SFN features located outside the diamond fork system impact area of influence see chapter 3 section 3.1 31 31 for description of impact area of influence 3 comments on the cumulative impacts of the total bonneville unit were not considered and responses were not prepared the FSFEIS FS FEIS does not contain the bonneville unit cumulative impact analysis an analysis will be prepared for the NEPA compliance document on the utah lake drainage basin water delivery system m in addition to the comments on the SFN DEIS some of the letters also contained comments on the technical reports that supported the SFN DEIS the comments on the technical reports also were screened using the same criteria listed above with the addition of one additional criterion any comments dealing with the utah lake hydrology technical report were not considered and responses were not prepared the sole purpose of this technical report was to identify and document impacts of the bonneville unit on utah lake water resources these impacts also are deferred to the completion of the last EIS on the bonneville unit the hydrology and water resources technical memorandumfor memorandum for the diamond fork system FSFEIS FS FEIS CUWCD CLJWCD 19 1999d 9 ad 9d does include detailed water resource data on delivery of 8 86100 6 100 loo acre feet of bonneville unit water to utah lake for the proposed action responses on appropriate technical report comments will be provided to the commentor commenter com mentor on an individual basis it should be noted that even though responses have been provided the technical reports were not revised or reprinted new or revised technical data that were needed to prepare this FSFEIS FS FEIS were placed in technical memoranda these technical memoranda have been made part of the official file system see chapter 3 section 3.1 31 31 44.2 442 442 letter comments and responses A total of 26 comment letters were received using the screening criteria identified above 15 letters contained comments which required responses these letters are identified in table 43 4 3 45 4 5 diamond fork system FSFEIS FS FEIS
Identifier http://cdm15999.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/WesternWatersProject/id/10069

© Western Waters Digital Library - GWLA member projects - Designed by the J. Willard Marriott Library - Hosted by Oregon State University Libraries and Press