Record Details

page 4

Digital Collections at BYU

Field Value
Title page 4 Diamond Fork System Final Supplement to the Final Environmental Impact Statement, page 4
Coverage Electronic reproduction;
Format 4 text/PDF
Rights Brigham Young University; http://lib.byu.edu/about/copyright/generic.php Public Domain Public
Language English; eng; en
Relation Central Utah Project; Western Waters Digital Library; comment letter no 25 page 4 of 5 page 1145 1 145 table 154 1 54 all the department of natural resources agencies should be listed the same the state engineer should be listed as the division of water rights also it would be better to identify the division of wildlife resources lands as division lands and not as department of natural resources lands page 1146 1 146 bottom paragraph are the 7 cities listed the only cities contacted Is so why were the other cities in south utah county that will be affected by the project not contacted page 1152 1 152 fourth paragraph section 1922.1 19221 distribution systems it may be more correct to say the division of water resources will work with the irrigation companies as they seek assistance from the board of water resources page 1162 1 162 section 1934.1 19341 mapleton distribution pipeline it would help to identify who is planning a trail along the existing mapleton canal page 216 2 16 second paragraph section 233 23.3 233 23311 2331.1 1.1 11 li ii impact on utah lake it states the average reduction in provo river inflow to utah lake is about 95500 acre feet how does this figure relate to the provo river depletion figure of 98500 acre feet in table 1 11 I 1 page 113 113 we assume the 21 21000 1000 acre feet of SFN system return flows is the same as the 20800 acre feet of return flows shown on figure 12 1 2 page 111 1 11 but round to 21000 acre feet page 219 2 19 table 23 2 3 the figure 22000 acre feet of irrigation Z releases to the jordan river is not correct to add to 56800 acre feet the number should be 223000 acre feet see table 31 3 1 page 38 3 8 draft utah lake hydrology technical report page 3.215 3215 32 3215 15 bottom paragraph it would help to clarify I 1 in this paragraph that the reduced flows in salt creek would only be from the diversion down and there will be a minimum flow below the diversion through nephi during the irrigation season page 3.83 383 38 383 3 bottom paragraph it would be more accurate to say scattered pinyon pines we doubt there are other species of pine in the impact area 2
Identifier http://cdm15999.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/WesternWatersProject/id/9931

© Western Waters Digital Library - GWLA member projects - Designed by the J. Willard Marriott Library - Hosted by Oregon State University Libraries and Press