Record Details
page S-10
Digital Collections at BYU
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Title | page S-10 Phase II summary report (final) : Utah Lake water quality, hydrology and aquatic biology impact analysis summary for the irrigation and drainage system--Bonneville Unit, Central Utah Project, page S-10 |
| Coverage | Electronic reproduction; |
| Format | S-10 text/PDF |
| Rights | Brigham Young University; http://lib.byu.edu/about/copyright/generic.php Public Domain Public |
| Language | English; eng; en |
| Relation | Central Utah Project; Western Waters Digital Library; DIKING alternative LITTORAL communities I 1 DPR provo bay loss of animal and plant species which are dike 9.3 93 93 drawdown obligate epiphytes probable modification of nearshore near shore plankton communities due to the loss of marsh vascular plants loss of some algal species which are presently restricted to the hardpan and large rubble localities severe reduction of some animal species common in the hardpan and large rubble habitat types face of dikes would probably be colonized with same species as found on existing rocky shorelines including sponges and bryozoans bryozoa ns diversity standing crop and density of littoral plants and ani mals on dike face dependant upon slope materials used on face and sedimentation II 11 DPR without provo reduction in numbers of the plant and animal bay 9.3 93 93 drawdown species which are obligate epiphytes loss of some algal species which are presently restricted to the hardpan and large rubble localities severe reduction of some animal species common in the hardpan and large rubble habitat types face of dike would probably be colonized with same species as found on existing rocky shorelines including sponges and bryozoans bryozoa ns diversity standing crop and density of littoral plants and ani mals on dike face dependant upon slope materials used on face and sedimentation iia goshen dike at A reductions in the losses of algal species without provo bay presently restricted to the large rubble and 9.3 93 93 drawdown hardpan localities less impact upon the animal species important in these same localities higher biotic diversity retained in the lake by this dike placement biota on face of dike may not be as diverse as for DPR location due to possible sedimentation of eastern end lib goshen dike at B reductions in the losses of algal species without provo bay presently restricted to the large rubble and 9.3 93 93 drawdown hardpan localities less impact upon the animal species important in these same localities higher biotic diversity retained in the lake by this dike placement this placement similar in its effects to that in the iia placement lessens the impacts of diking discussed under item I 1 even more than iia since more habitat is saved biota S 10 |
| Identifier | http://cdm15999.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/WesternWatersProject/id/9602 |
