Record Details
page 78
Digital Collections at BYU
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Title | page 78 Final Environmental Statement : authorized Bonneville Unit, Central Utah Project, Utah, Volume II, page 78 |
| Coverage | Electronic reproduction; |
| Source | Central Utah Water Conservancy District |
| Publisher | Brigham Young University |
| Date | 2005-10-14 |
| Format | 78 text/PDF |
| Rights | Brigham Young University; http://lib.byu.edu/about/copyright/generic.php Public Domain Public |
| Language | English; eng; en |
| Relation | Central Utah Project; Western Waters Digital Library; response species lists were purposely omitted from the DES to help limit the size of the document these lists may be found in the references listed on page B 56 and in the biological impact analysis report prepared by the bureau of reclamation raptores raptors were not discussed in this section because interim operation of the municipal and industrial system would have no significant impact on wildlife species in the diamond fork drainage 17 comment page B 58 3 moose moose are natural immigrants into the upper provo river area and will become an important game species in areas of suitable habitat response respons respens e the paragraph has been changed to indicate that moose are immigrants into the upper provo river area 18 comment furbearers bearers Fur first paragraph third sentence we do not know of any evidence that river otter inhabits this area there should be a comment on ringtail cats since they inhabit the area in limited numbers response A biological inventory report by the utah division of wildlife re sources 1977 indicated an unconfirmed sighting of an otter in the upper provo river area brigham young university 1975 in a report prepared for the bureau of reclamation also listed the otter as a resident of the area although the range of the ringtail cat does extend through the area it was not listed in either of these biological reports as being found in the provo river area 19 comment page B 61 second paragraph starting with wood rats mice animal densities as quoted in the latter part of this paragraph are not useful unless a table is added showing numbers of different species included as previously recommended response tabular presentations of animal densities are included in the biological impact analysis report prepared by the bureau of reclamation and in the report referenced in section B 10 because of restrictions on the size of the FES tabular material is summarized those wanting further detail may refer to the reports referenced 78 |
| Identifier | http://cdm15999.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/WesternWatersProject/id/9541 |
