Record Details

page 12

Digital Collections at BYU

Field Value
Title page 12 Diamond Fork System Final Supplement to the Final Environmental Impact Statement, page 12
Coverage Electronic reproduction;
Format 12 text/PDF
Rights Brigham Young University; http://lib.byu.edu/about/copyright/generic.php Public Domain Public
Language English; eng; en
Relation Central Utah Project; Western Waters Digital Library; comment letter no 22 page 12 of 17 spanish fork canyon nephi irrigation system 12 219 2 19 table 23 2 3 outflows and change in storage irrigation releases to jordan river baseline average flow should probably be 223000 221000 AF rather than 22000 AF this error was carried over from table 22 2 2 of the DEIS however even 223000 AF may not be the correct figure for releases down the jordan river the text page 314 3 14 ofthe odthe of the utah lake hydrology technical report describes jordan river releases and spills as 267000 AF this is 33000 AF more than the average of 223000 AF irrigation releasesl releases release releases11000 sl 1000 11000 AF of spills down the jordan river shown in tables 41 4 1 and other similar tables 219 2 19 table 23 2 3 provo river inflows and other surface inflows baseline average what are the correct numbers those shown in the DEIS or those shown in the utah lake technical report table 31 3 1 and 41 4 1 230 2 30 second paragraph ath 6th paragraph of section 2334 23341 2334.1 233.4 23341 2334 1 last line genus name of white pelican is R pelecanus 236 2 36 first paragraph species name for wiregrass wi regrass should be juncus argticus arcticus arg arc ticus 3.42 342 34 342 2 345 34.5 34511 345 34511 3451.1 1 1 juncus argticus arcticus arg arc ticus is misspelled again 3.45 345 34 345 5 3451.2 34512 saline meadow pitehihhsl distchilis bist Dist chilis should be spelled distichlis 3.47 347 34 347 7 top of page part of 3451.7 34517 34517 riparian shrub russian olive should be spelled E anmstitolia ansustifolia instead of angustifolious angustifolius angffstiforithrut 3.541 3541 35 3541 41 pages 3 and 4 of table 3.519 3519 35 3519 19 the table shows that mitigation for 773 acres and 757.8 7578 acres of critical big game winter range losses by MCAP and MCATC alternatives will be acquisition of 120 and 90 acres of critical winter range habitat respectively the mitigation ratio for habitat acquisition for these two alternatives should be the same as for other alternatives describing the mitigation the same way as it was for the MCAPW alternative not quantifying the number of acres to be acquired is also acceptable 366 3.66 366 36 66 gg .66 66 6 6 3651.2 36512 36512 fish species composition wildlife resources has made periodic anneal annual stockings of 3.610 3610 36 3610 10 ktalurus2lahtrtff ictalurus pta Ita ata italurus lurus punctatus punct atus 3.610 3610 36 3610 10 3657.2 36572 36572 peteetneet Peteet neet creek fish species reword re word sentence something like creek contains cutthroat and stocked rainbow trout the iatter latter after lather aster ahter ineittding including wild fish and stocked bish fish gish sawaguchi sakaguchi i 11 1994 994
Identifier http://cdm15999.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/WesternWatersProject/id/9517

© Western Waters Digital Library - GWLA member projects - Designed by the J. Willard Marriott Library - Hosted by Oregon State University Libraries and Press