Record Details
page 3-107
Digital Collections at BYU
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Title | page 3-107 Final environmental impact statement on the Provo River Restoration Project, page 3-107 |
| Coverage | Electronic reproduction; |
| Format | 3-107 text/PDF |
| Rights | Brigham Young University; http://lib.byu.edu/about/copyright/generic.php Public Domain Public |
| Language | English; eng; en |
| Relation | Central Utah Project; Western Waters Digital Library; 31364 51364 5136.4 3136.4 31364 51364 existing channel ch annel modification alternative 31364.1 313641 313641 construction hazards construction hazards and related SOPs under this alternative are the same as described in section 31363.1 313631 31364.2 313642 313642 hazards related to flooding this alternative would increase the frequency of flooding along the provo river but would contain floodwaters flood waters within the dikes constructed as part of the alternative risks to people would be minimal for the same reasons described in section 31363.2 313632 313632 31364.3 313643 313643 other hazards after construction the minor increase in traffic accident risks under this alternative would be the same as described in section 31363.3 313633 313633 31364.4 313644 313644 impact summary the impact summary for this alternative is the same as in section 31363.4 313634 313634 31365 51365 5136.5 3136.5 31365 instream In stream structures alternative potential health and safety impacts for this alternative would be the same as described for the proposed action in section 3136.3 31363 31363 except this alternative would not increase the frequency of flooding along the provo river because the river channel would not be modified 3136.6 31366 no action alternative the no action alternative would have no impacts on health and safety baseline conditions would continue as described in section 313.5 3135 3135 under the no action alternative 3.14 314 noise 314.1 3141 introduction this noise analysis addresses potential impacts from the construction activities and resulting recreation traffic of the provo river restoration project the methodology used to conduct the noise analysis is defined in appendix B section b213 the following noise topics are addressed in the impact analysis 3107 310 3 10 9 0 noise from construction activities 9 noise after construction ie from recreation traffic generated by the proposed action and alternatives 314.2 3142 issues eliminated from further analysis none of the noise issues identified during scop scoping i and defined in section 314.3 3143 were eliminated from further analysis 314.3 3143 issues addressed in the impact analysis the following issues were raised in scoping and are addressed in the noise impact analysis would construction of the proposed action and alternatives increase noise levels in heber valley would the recreation traffic and increase in recreation use caused by the proposed action and alternatives increase noise levels 314.4 3144 3144 description of impact area of influence the impact area of influence for the noise analysis includes areas where noise generated by the proposed action and alternatives would be heard noise would be generated from heber valley roads used by construction and recreation traffic and areas along the provo river where construction activities would occur map 31 3 1 in section 311.1 3111 shows the overall impact area of influence 314.5 3145 affected environment baseline conditions noise is measured using the A weighted decibel scale aba dba values on this scale represent the loudness of common sounds perceived by humans quantified noise data were not available to help define baseline noise conditions in the impact area of influence however some general conclusions can be reached based on field visits and published noise studies CEQ 1970 and urban institute 1976 |
| Identifier | http://cdm15999.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/WesternWatersProject/id/8640 |
