Record Details
page 4-176
Digital Collections at BYU
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Title | page 4-176 Final environmental impact statement on the Provo River Restoration Project, page 4-176 |
| Coverage | Electronic reproduction; |
| Format | 4-176 text/PDF |
| Rights | Brigham Young University; http://lib.byu.edu/about/copyright/generic.php Public Domain Public |
| Language | English; eng; en |
| Relation | Central Utah Project; Western Waters Digital Library; comment letter no 22 0 to the extent feasible ROWs for project features will be aligned to minimize the me loss of large trees sensitive fish and wildlife habitats and unique plant communities 0 to the extent feasible construction in vitin vicinity ity of such sensitive habitats as 22.7 227 227 deer fawning areas will be scheduled during times when disturbance impacts cont will be avoided typically deer fawning occurs during june july 0 future land uses in ROWs will exclude the replacement of buildings removed during construction and any uses that impair water quality 31.2 312 2 comments on baseline conditions for the PRRP in regards to the final supplement to the final environmental impact statement for the mai mal system are the same as the conditions described in the WCWEP DEIS DEES dels our comments on 1 111 1.11 iii ili 11 3 of the WCWEP DEIS addressed these baseline conditions we believe that some modification in the first bullet which was a commitment contained in the mai mal system EISs may be necessary because of verbiage in sec 303c2 which states that the URMCC in consultation with the service and UDWR shall determine the date that tnimmnm streamflows stream flows of 125 cfs cs can be 22.8 228 feasibly maintained continuously and in perpetuity between jordanelle Jor danelle and deer creek reservoirs 3 the third bullet describing commitments contained in mai mal system EISs is erroneous in that fencing of the new angler access along the provo river was not required by these commitments the service however believes fencing of the floodplain flood plain to allow management of cattle grazing and increase the chance of regrowth of cottonwood trees that are used for perching by the bald eagle is essential and intends to include fencing as a reasonable and prudent alternative for reducing take of bald eagles in their BO on the PRRP inclusion of fencing is therefore necessary although not a commitment of the mai mal EISs with this exception we believe including the first three bullets presented here as ECs would be appropriate the following ks ECs are suggested for consideration 0 any existing river diversion facilities located between jordanelle danelle Jor and deer creek reservoirs that are incapable of allowing a minimum of 125 cfs cs to pass 22.9 229 229 at all times shall be reconstructed to function properly at that flow 4 cont 0 designs for river diversion structures shall include features to screen all intakes and facilitate fish migration fish ladders such designs shall be 3 see previous discussion on 1 1117 111.7 117 11.7 117 2 4 this EC was presented previously see comments on 111.72 11172 9 page 9 of 22 4176 4 176 |
| Identifier | http://cdm15999.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/WesternWatersProject/id/8339 |
