Record Details
page 1-65
Digital Collections at BYU
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Title | page 1-65 Final environmental impact statement on the Provo River Restoration Project, page 1-65 |
| Coverage | Electronic reproduction; |
| Format | 1-65 text/PDF |
| Rights | Brigham Young University; http://lib.byu.edu/about/copyright/generic.php Public Domain Public |
| Language | English; eng; en |
| Relation | Central Utah Project; Western Waters Digital Library; spawning habitat for trout outt as well as providing a minimum level of channel erosion control final design would incorporate modifications from this plan as required to meet conditions in the channel when the project is implemented certain structures may be dropped from implementation or substituted based on experience and agency preference under this alternative channel width and depth are defined by the presence of the existing dikes discharges up to or in some areas exceeding the 100 year peak discharge are contained within the dikes with no overbankfloodplain flows except in reach 4 which has no dikes table 113 1 13 shows average channel velocities and other channel and floodplain flood plain characteristics for the instream In stream structures alternative throughout a range of design flows the hi stream structures alternative would not involve modifications to diversion dams or headgates head gates it is assumed that diversion modifications necessary to accommodate the minimurn mini minimum murn instream in stream flow requirement would be made as part of baseline conditions 17.2 172 public access the seven public access points shown in map 11 1 1 in section 13.1 131 131 and an access corridor along the entire existing river channel would be developed under baseline conditions no new public access corridor areas beyond baseline would be acquired for the mstream histream stream astream hi structures alternative Altema tive fencing would be accomplished under baseline conditions 17.3 173 173 changes in ownership and land use 1 1731 173.1 731 73.1 731 land ownership the In instream mstream stream astream structures alternative could be fully constructed and maintained within the existing property and easements owned by the united states even without the public access corridor acquisition assumed for baseline conditions however remaining nonfederal non federal lands on the river would be acquired in fee title to satisfy the baseline requirements see section 14.1 141 1 1732 173.2 732 73.2 1732 732 land use construction vehicles and equipment would use temporary access roads to move from existing 1 public roads to construction areas throughout the project area the majority of these roads would be situated along the existing and proposed channel alignments or along the existing dikes and would become part of the area acquired for the core area land uses of all types would be temporarily restricted on access roads during construction less than one acre of existing lands outside the core area would be needed for construction access roads existing and planned land uses could resume after construction on access roads not in the core area the project area would be fenced to exclude livestock from natural resource areas and to protect surrounding private property from the public the type and style of minimum standard fencing would be as described under baseline conditions see section 14.1 141 141 provisions would be made for allowing livestock crossing or access zones through the fenced areas where this would be required by the adjacent landowner to continue grazing activities 17.4 174 174 construction procedures 174.1 1741 typical construction procedures construction activities would be conducted with a minimum of disturbance on the existing channel and adjacent areas only light mechanical equipment eg backhoe backhon bac khoe small dozer track mounted excavator truck for hauling large rock would be required for placement of habitat structures after materials have been delivered to the site typical construction procedures would consist of first staking locations of proposed habitat structures or marking locations on existing trees boulders etc some of this surveying was accomplished in 1991 as part of the clearwater biostudies Bio Studies me inc project but it may have to be verified or re surveyed structure locations would not be exact as shown in the design plans as long as structures could be suitably anchored in place larger construction materials boulders logs trees would be stockpiled stockpiler stock piled as close to the construction sites as possible selection of stockpiling sites would be accomplished in coordination with landowners agencies or the contractor to minimize impacts on existing land uses smaller materials may be stockpiled stockpiler stock piled at the USBR facility below jordanelle danelle Jor dam for later use by construction crews |
| Identifier | http://cdm15999.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/WesternWatersProject/id/8276 |
