Record Details
page 4-94
Digital Collections at BYU
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Title | page 4-94 Final environmental impact statement on the Provo River Restoration Project, page 4-94 |
| Coverage | Electronic reproduction; |
| Format | 4-94 text/PDF |
| Rights | Brigham Young University; http://lib.byu.edu/about/copyright/generic.php Public Domain Public |
| Language | English; eng; en |
| Relation | Central Utah Project; Western Waters Digital Library; comment letter no 13 karen ricks provo river restoration project 5 13.17 1317 A reviewed especially in light of recently developed technologies for stream habitat cont AL A improvement structures P 153 1 53 section 1.1 11 ii li 1112 111.2 1.2 12 12 13 significant impacts can occur to fish and wildlife species due to heavy machinery and construction activities it is indicated that intensive out of IP channel activities for construction of side channels ponds and setback dikes will 13.18 1318 occur from may july this period falls within the reproductive season of most wetland species spotted frog tadpole hatching and development nesting birds etc specific and special care needs to occur to protect fish and wildlife from inadvertent impacts P 164 1 64 standard operating procedures during construction for aquatic resources does not mention seasonal time periods which may be sensitive for brown trout spawning 13.19 1319 IP and egg incubation this needs to be incorporated into the environmental commitment checklist and measures to minimize impacts need to be described P 164 1 64 sopsfot SOPS for fot ror threatened and endangered species are not described in the PRRP IP DAIS because they are already covered in the WCWEPDRP WCWEPIDRP DEIS however 1320 13.20 these procedures need to clarified with concerned agencies and adequately addressed in the environmental commitment checklist P 21 2 1 section 2.3 12 23 23 table 21 2 1 does not compare impacts on wildlife or tae species these impacts are briefly discussed however in the text P 22 2 2 table 21 2 1 under net change in wetland acres and net change in wildlife habitat acres please clarify that the increase inmrase in wildlife habitat is wetland habitat so 13.21 1321 readers will not need to assume that they are arc arm amm separate net increases in different habitat types this CMs is not clear from this table although it is explained 3 pages later in the text P 39 3 9 section 335.1 3351 improvement in water quality hi in the provo river due to the 13.22 1322 IP proposed alternative which includes the actions of removing cattle grazing and construction of ponds is beneficial to native fish species P 312 342 3 12 right col 2nd and & 3rd ard para we feel it is critical that flows flow from jordanclle jordanelle Jord Jor anelle danelle anclle anelie reservoir reach deer creekreservoir creek reservoir in less than 12 hours to insure that the 13.23 1323 river does not warm to much last week week weck week weed of july 15 151996 1996 charles cont thompson central region aquatics manager UDWR measured stream temperatures immediately below jordanelle dam to be 10 C 50 F it was 12 C 536 53.6 536 F at river road bridge and 15 C 59 F at the midway nedway bridge hdid edid he did not measure it at the meserv reserv reservoir bir because the water was still backed U up p past the page 5 of 10 494 4 94 |
| Identifier | http://cdm15999.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/WesternWatersProject/id/7692 |
