Record Details
page 52
Digital Collections at BYU
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Title | page 52 Final environmental statement : authorized municipal and industrial system, Bonneville Unit, Central Utah Project, Utah, Vol. 2, page 52 |
| Coverage | Electronic reproduction; |
| Date | 13 |
| Format | 52 text/PDF |
| Rights | Brigham Young University; http://lib.byu.edu/about/copyright/generic.php Public Domain Public |
| Language | English; eng; en |
| Relation | Central Utah Project; Western Waters Digital Library; page 5 during the summer without the project there would be 1.9 19 19 ig 5.9 59 59 acres of adult brown trout habitat 90 percent of the summers at least 2.9 29 29 acres 50 percent of the summers and less than 20 2.0 20 acres 10 percent of the summers with the project there would be 1.9 19 lg tg 4.5 45 45 acres of habitat 90 percent of the summers at least 2.3 23 23 acres 50 percent of the summers and less than 2.0 20 20 acres 16 percent of the summers the net result would be a 21 percent reduction in habitat during the summer the overall year round carrying capacity will wilt be limited by summer conditions consequently there will wilt be a 21 percent reduction in the overall value of the streamfishery stream fishery page C 39 7 olmstead diversion to utah lake the 38 mile section of stream between the olmstead and murdock diversions is a major fishery with habitat that is quite different from the lower tower 10.2 102 102 mile reach in the upper 3.8 38 38 mile section we find that without the project there would be 071.1 0711 0711 acres of adult brown trout habitat 90 percent of the winters at least 0.9 09 09 og acres 50 percent of the winters and less than 0.9 09 09 og acres 10 percent of the winters with the project there would be 092.0 0920 09 0920 20 acres 90 percent of the winters at least 10 1.0 lo io acres 50 percent of the winters and less than 0.9 09 09 og acres about one percent of the winters the net result will be about an 11 percent increase in habitat during the winter during the summer without the project the upper 3.8 38 38 miles reach would have 072.5 0725 07 0725 25 acres of adult brown trout habitat 90 percent of the summers at least 2.0 20 20 acres 50 percent of the summers and less than 1.2 12 12 acres 10 percent of the summers the net result will be about a 10 percent increase in habitat during the summer the net overall effect on the upper 3.8 38 38 mile section will be about 10 percent or 0.2 02 02 acre increase in adult brown trout habitat as a result of the project page C 40 b diamond fork spanish fork drainage it is mentioned that summer flows of these streams would not change with project operations but that winter flows would increase and this would be of benefit to the affected streams inadequate streamflows stream flows can certainly certainty limit streamfisheries stream fisheries habitat however excessively high flows can also be a limiting factor the previous comments for page C 34 are applicable pages C 40 to C 41 c utah lake the statement that impacts of the M and I 1 system upon the utah lake fishery would be minimal because flows down the diamond fork spanish fork drainages would maintain present lake levels is questionnable question nable the walleye june sucker and white bass of utah lake spawn in the provo river and reduced streamflows stream flows will undoubtedly reduce their success it is mentioned on page E 1 that the elimination of walleye wali watt waii eye habitat of the 52 |
| Identifier | http://cdm15999.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/WesternWatersProject/id/7203 |
