Record Details
page 77
Digital Collections at BYU
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Title | page 77 Central Utah Project, Bonneville Unit : Diamond Fork Power System : final Environmental Impact Statement, page 77 |
| Coverage | Electronic reproduction; |
| Format | 77 text/PDF |
| Rights | Brigham Young University; http://lib.byu.edu/about/copyright/generic.php Public Domain Public |
| Language | English; eng; en |
| Relation | Central Utah Project; Western Waters Digital Library; CHAPTER 111 III lii alternatives about 4.3 43 43 miles of forest service roads would be inundated and some would be relocated syar reservoir would inundate about a half mile of the existing rays valley road which would be replaced by about 0.7 07 07 mile of new road around the reservoir monks hollow reservoir would inundate 2.9 29 29 miles of the existing diamond fork canyon road this road would not be replaced no relocation of roads would be necessary at sixth water reservoir no power transmission or telephone lines would be relocated provisions for livestock permittees permit tees would be followed as described under the recommended plan construction activities and schedule construction activities for the sixth water pumped storage alterna aeterna tive would be conducted in the same manner as in the recommended plan As with the recommended plan the construction period would be about 6 years 1964 DPR alternative PLAN accomplishments AND CONCEPTS the 1964 definite plan report DPR alternative would utilize the transbasin trans basin diversion of water from strawberry reservoir and the large drop in elevation from the reservoir to generate 133.5 1335 MW of conven tional dional hydroelectric power the transbasin trans basin diversion would provide water for irrigation and municipal and industrial uses by the mai m&i and iad lad systems recreation facilities and fishery mitigation would be pro vided aided a limited flatwater fl atwater fishery would be created some flood control would be accomplished in sixth water and diamond fork creeks and wild life losses would be mitigated the major features of this alternative are shown in figures 19 and 20 from the strawberry tunnel inlet at strawberry reservoir water would flow through the proposed syar tunnel and penstock to the proposed syar reservoir which would be formed by a dam on a saddle north of rays valley between fifth water and sixth water creeks from the reservoir water would be conveyed by the proposed corona aqueduct and sixth water penstock to the proposed sixth water reservoir which would be formed by a dam on sixth water creek about due west of syar reservoir water from the reservoir would be conveyed through the proposed dyne aqueduct and penstock to the dyne powerplant Power plant which would be located near three forks at this point the flow would be divided A portion of the water would be conveyed in the proposed wasatch aqueduct down diamond fork to the spanish fork river the remainder would be released into diamond fork and would flow into hayes reservoir to be located about a half mile upstream from the confluence of diamond fork and the spanish fork river and then into the spanish fork river some flood control would be provided in sixth water and hayes reservoirs power would be generated at three proposed flow through plants syar at syar reservoir sixth water at sixth water reservoir and dyne at the terminus of the dyne penstock surge tanks would be provided at the syar sixth water and dyne plants 77 |
| Identifier | http://cdm15999.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/WesternWatersProject/id/6751 |
