Record Details

page 4-19

Digital Collections at BYU

Field Value
Title page 4-19 Final environmental impact statement on the Wasatch County Water Efficiency Project and Daniel Replacement Project, page 4-19
Coverage Electronic reproduction;
Format 4-19 text/PDF
Rights Brigham Young University; http://lib.byu.edu/about/copyright/generic.php Public Domain Public
Language English; eng; en
Relation Central Utah Project; Western Waters Digital Library; page W 332 3 32 right column paragraph 1 section 3263.2 32632 32632 change to read A change in livestock water supply source from canals to watering troughs two pipelines totaling 3 miles in length A A 3 mile buried pipeline would be constructed to divert water from a spring to supply sixfew sixfettf livestock watering troughs about 2 acre feet of water would be diverted annually from the spring page W 333 3 33 table 310 3 10 section 3263.1 32631 change to read SEE REVISED TABLE 310 3 10 ON NEXT PAGE page W 335 3 35 left column paragraph 3 section 3263.2 32632 32632 change to read the mitigation commission in consultation with the fish and wildlife service FWS and the utah division of wildlife resources will decide where to utilize the increased strawberry reservoir inflow for stream flow enhancement page W 338 3 38 left column paragraph 1 section 32633.2 326332 326332 change to read the source of the supplemental water supply for these streams would be bypass flows diverted from the provo river and conserved irrigation water made available by the proposed action conserved irrigation water conserved from non CUP water diversions from the provo river and non CUP water diversions from local tributaries tributa ries would be regulated in jordanelle Jor danelle reservoir and released to the streams when needed to meet target instream in stream flows recommended by the fishery technical advisory committee established by the CUWCD during the plan formulation stage page W 349 3 49 right column paragraph 2 section 3263.7 32637 32637 change to read water resources technical report figure 49 4 9 shows that there is no average drawdown on jordanelle Jor danelle reservoir and a 100 acre feet per year average drawdown on deer creek reservoir over the study period this is because modeled reservoir levels in both jordanelle Jor danelle and deer creek reservoirs under the proposed action have recovered to very near baseline levels by the end of the study period table 314 3 14 indicates that aaverage daverage jordanelle Jor danelle reservoir storage levels would be approximately 8600 acre feet less than baseline storage levels and deer creek reservoir storage levels would be 1100 acre feet less than baseline levels in actual operation of the proposed action reservoir reservoir drawdowns draw downs would be limited to levels that would not adversely impact CUP and non CUP deliveries CUP and non CUP deliveries to water users downstream of deer creek reservoir would not change from baseline amounts although provo river flows between jordanelle Jor danelle and deer creek reservoirs would change slightly because of the changes in diversions and return flows average annual river flows below deer creek reservoir would not change supplemental flows placed in five heber valley streams and ditches would increase flows in these streams over baseline conditions page W 350 3 50 right column paragraph 4 section 3264.4 32644 32644 change to read provo river flow below deer creek reservoir to the olmstead diversion would be reduced by an average of 43 cfs cs or I 1 1 percent of the total 419 4 19
Identifier http://cdm15999.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/WesternWatersProject/id/6538

© Western Waters Digital Library - GWLA member projects - Designed by the J. Willard Marriott Library - Hosted by Oregon State University Libraries and Press