Record Details

page 42

Digital Collections at BYU

Field Value
Title page 42 Final Environmental Statement : authorized Bonneville, Unit, Central Utah Project, Utah : Appendix A Review Comments, page 42
Coverage Electronic reproduction;
Source United States. Bureau of Reclamation
Publisher Brigham Young University
Date 2005-10-14
Format 42 text/PDF
Rights Brigham Young University; http://lib.byu.edu/about/copyright/generic.php Public Domain Public
Language English; eng; en
Relation Central Utah Project; Western Waters Digital Library; page 158 hth 4th ath paragraph should indicate that lu 14 reservoirs will be stabilized on the upper provo page 159 1595 ist paragraph average flows have been used which does not give a true picture high and low flows should be shown highs must mast be shown to determine the adverse effect on stream channels lows for minimum flows for fish habitat flows within the capacity of the aqueduct intake structures and not required for downstream rights would be diverted into the aqueducts this includes all the winter flows and means the streams below these diversions will be dry for 8 toli to 11 months out of the year depending on high spring flow and irrigation requirements hades creek wolf creek twin creek and others could be entirely dewatered watered dewaterer de according to USGS water records there is no diversion plan for the north fork foik fort r of duchesne because of prior water rights and the flood flows are already diverted into the provo river by the duchesne tunnel the USGS points out that winter readings on their gages are not accurate because of icing and therefore more water may be available last paragraph this is a misleading statement true there will be water in most streams somewhere downstream however this would not be released at the diversions and the streams would be de watered at the diversion points the amount of accretion flows will not take care of the stream fisheries in most cases within the national forests figures cl C l 1 C 2 and C 3 following page 159 these charts would be more meaningful if the flows in cfs cs at the diversion and below the diversion were indicated on the charts page 160 igo ist paragraph C duchesne county plans to develop several springs in the rock creek about 5 miles below the upper stillwater reservoir the springs could supply municipal water that is presently needed for expansion of corm communities unities in duchesne county this proposal if approved would affect the bureau bureaus s mi minimum nilman stream flow of 25 cfs cs at the forest boundary by using accretion flows previously planned ror for I 1 or minimum stream strean strear streanflow strearsilow flow Silow minimum streamflows stream lows flows would then necessarily be met by reservoir releases leases te page 160 igo 3rd ard paragraph co comments ents ants on the diversion structures and dams daris damie damle along the strawberry strawberr j aqueduct as related to water releases are being commented on in other sections 42
Identifier http://cdm15999.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/WesternWatersProject/id/5774

© Western Waters Digital Library - GWLA member projects - Designed by the J. Willard Marriott Library - Hosted by Oregon State University Libraries and Press