Record Details
page 3-152
Digital Collections at BYU
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Title | page 3-152 Final environmental impact statement on the Wasatch County Water Efficiency Project and Daniel Replacement Project, page 3-152 |
| Coverage | Electronic reproduction; |
| Format | 3-152 text/PDF |
| Rights | Brigham Young University; http://lib.byu.edu/about/copyright/generic.php Public Domain Public |
| Language | English; eng; en |
| Relation | Central Utah Project; Western Waters Digital Library; comment letter no 25 wa w3 8 25.30 2530 iw3 iwa 25.31 2531 I 1 iwa iw3 w39 9 I 1 w3 wa 9 c 2532 32 .32 32 JM I 1 B 10 i wa w3 20 25.33 2533 iw3 iwa wa w3 25 2534 25.34 wa w3 33 2535 25.35 wa w3 35 2536 25.36 wa w3 37 2537 25.37 wa w3 44 wa w3 46 2538 25.38 34 3 4 wa w3 50 25.39 2539 iw3 iwa w3 wa 64 25.40 2540 page 8 of 10 32.1 321 321 you need to provide support for conclusions that on farm water efficiency improvements would likely be infeasible and funding likely not available under the DRP alternatives 322.1 3221 3221 you need to deal with the growth facilitating aspect of this project head on as well as the connected issue of why we are doing this project if the heber valley is going to be wall to wall residential projects 322.2 3222 3222 through 323.2 3232 3232 there is no reference here and on map 32 3 2 to the impact of the emplacement of the dam 325.5 3255 3255 these references to the 75 cs cfs requirement seem to rest on the assumption that you do not have to provide the 75 cfs cs one way or another the legislation requires that you do does it militate toward the investigation into other alternatives suggested above 3258.2 32582 32582 you are using the wrong baseline for your groundwater level assumptions as discussed above this would impact all of your discussions concerning wells springs or any other water source or resource in the valley table 310 3 10 this should be westside ditch 4 supplemental flow instead of rock ditch and its average 32633.2 326332 326332 sentence 2 should read would be created in westside ditch 4 instead of rock ditch table 312 342 3 12 this should be westside ditch 4 with its monthly data instead of rock ditch 32636.2 326362 326362 same comment concerning the impact of the emplacement of the dam 32636.2 326362 326362 paragraph 8 this paragraph should talk to the westside ditch 4 instead of rock ditch 3263.7 32637 32637 same comment concerning the impact of the emplacement of the dam 32743.2 327432 327432 sentence 4 flows in the westside ditch 4 might not be reduced during late summer as a result of reduced CUP water deliveries to the north fields irrigation company because bemuse of the possibility of supplemental water allocated for side channels for the PRRP 336422 what met gat wet about the loss of sediments in the provo river due to the Jordanel jordanelle jordanellg Jor danelle lg dam 6 3152 3 152 |
| Identifier | http://cdm15999.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/WesternWatersProject/id/4482 |
