Record Details
page 68
Digital Collections at BYU
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Title | page 68 Central Utah Project, Bonneville Unit : Diamond Fork Power System : final Environmental Impact Statement, page 68 |
| Coverage | Electronic reproduction; |
| Format | 68 text/PDF |
| Rights | Brigham Young University; http://lib.byu.edu/about/copyright/generic.php Public Domain Public |
| Language | English; eng; en |
| Relation | Central Utah Project; Western Waters Digital Library; CHAPTER III 111 lii alternatives relocations with the exception of some roads relocation provisions for the fifth water pumped storage alternative would be the same as in the recom becom mended plan about 22.4 224 224 miles of new access roads would be constructed and about 15.8 158 158 miles of existing roads would be upgraded existing power transmission lines and telephone lines would not be relocated provi sions for livestock permittees permit tees who would lose their grazing rights would be the same as in the recommended plan ranch properties consisting of 4443 acres in six separate parcels would be acquired for wildlife miti gation construction activities and schedule construction activities for the fifth water pumped storage alterna aeterna tive would be accomplished over a period of about 7 years and in the same manner as in the recommended plan sixth water pumped storage alternative PLAN accomplishments AND CONCEPT the sixth water pumped storage alternative would be basically the same as the recommended plan with the exception that the sixth water and the dyne powerplants Power plants would be pumped storage plants the sixth water pumped storage alternative would utilize the transbasin trans basin diversion of water from strawberry reservoir and the large drop in elevation from the reservoir to generate 422.6 4226 6226 MW of hydroelectric power the transbasin trans basin diversion would provide water for irrigation and municipal and indus trial uses by the mai m&i and iad i&d systems also recreation facilities would be provided stream fisheries would be considerably enhanced a limited flatwater fl atwater fishery would be created some flood control would be provided in diamond fork and wildlife losses would be mitigated the major features of the alternative are shown in figures 17 and 18 from its inlet at strawberry reservoir water would flow through syar tunnel and penstock to syar reservoir which would be formed by two dams on a saddle north of rays valley between fifth water and sixth water creeks from syar reservoir water would be conveyed by corona aqueduct and sixth water penstock to sixth water reservoir which would be formed by a dam on sixth water creek about due west of syar reservoir from there water would be carried in dyne aqueduct and dyne penstock to monks hollow reservoir which would be formed by a dam on diamond fork just below monks hollow water released from monks hollow reservoir would be conveyed through diamond fork pipeline to the confluence of diamond fork and the spanish fork river some flood control would be provided by syar sixth water and monks hollow reservoirs power would be generated at three proposed f flow low through plants syar at syar reservoir monks hollow at the base of monks hollow dam and diamond fork at the terminus of the diamond fork pipeline additionally power would be generated at two proposed pumped storage plants the sixth 68 |
| Identifier | http://cdm15999.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/WesternWatersProject/id/4429 |
