Record Details

page 238

Digital Collections at BYU

Field Value
Title page 238 Central Utah Project, Bonneville Unit : Diamond Fork Power System : final Environmental Impact Statement, page 238
Coverage Electronic reproduction;
Format 238 text/PDF
Rights Brigham Young University; http://lib.byu.edu/about/copyright/generic.php Public Domain Public
Language English; eng; en
Relation Central Utah Project; Western Waters Digital Library; consultation AND coordination continued to reclamation cost allocation procedures costs allocated to municipal and industrial water would be repaid by the municipal and industrial water users costs allocated to irrigation would be repaid partly by the irrigatory irrigators and the remainder would be repaid with CRSP revenues apportioned to the state of utah costs allocated to flood control recreation and fish and wildlife are nonreimbursable reimbursable non and would be paid by the federal federalgovernment government A preliminary cost allocation is outlined in a supplement to the 1964 bonneville unit definite plan report which will be made available in the fall of 1984 copies of this report will be made available on request 12 comment what is the loss of revenue from diverting diamond fork water from the colorado river basin and not allowing it to go over glen canyon and hoover dams response refer to the response to comment no 152 13 comment what is the destination of the 197000 acre feet of water response refer to the responses to comment nos 144 and 145 14 comment the effect of the transbasin trans basin diversion on utah lake and great salt lake economies and ecologies eco logies should be stated if there is a flooding situa tion like this year will the central utah water conservancy district be responsible for its share of flooding from the transbasin trans basin diversion to utah lake the unnecessary diversion of water into a flooded area is reckless responsibility response refer to the response to comment no 144 15 comment how will this project be kept within the guidelines of the 1965 repay ment contract which limited the cost to some 300 million response an additional repayment agreement will be negotiated to supplement the existing agreement the additional agreement will increase repayment coverage for municipal and industrial water costs 238
Identifier http://cdm15999.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/WesternWatersProject/id/4369

© Western Waters Digital Library - GWLA member projects - Designed by the J. Willard Marriott Library - Hosted by Oregon State University Libraries and Press