Record Details
page 97
Digital Collections at BYU
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Title | page 97 Central Utah Project, Bonneville Unit : Diamond Fork Power System : final Environmental Impact Statement, page 97 |
| Coverage | Electronic reproduction; |
| Format | 97 text/PDF |
| Rights | Brigham Young University; http://lib.byu.edu/about/copyright/generic.php Public Domain Public |
| Language | English; eng; en |
| Relation | Central Utah Project; Western Waters Digital Library; CHAPTER 111 III lii alternatives table 20 compari comparison son of environmental impacts of diamond fork power system alternative alternativesl alternatlvesl sl environmental category fish visa risa idyear midyear ID year iz streams R reservoirs servoirs servo irs legeta vegeta vegetation tion acres pe permanent rma nent temporaryz temporaryy Tempora ryZ wildlife indicator species huh HUY mule deer bob rob bobcat at golden golde goiden eagle coope coopers rs hawk bea beaver er wildlife mitigation required land acquisitio acquisition dacres nacres acres endangered specie species 9 water quality streams streamsl Stre amsl amsi 00 temperature ca cli c11 c1 1 D dissolved isso ived oxygen apin ppm1 ppin 3 turbid turbidity ity rese reservoir mir lir kir tp t temperature P erature grature C CJ 6 fifth water monks hollow hayes sixth water syar reservoir fluctuation feet daily dally daliy weekday fifth water monks hollow sixth water syar weekend fifth water monks honks hollow sixth water syar seasonal fifth water monks hollow hayes sixth water syar sys sya cultural resource9j resourcessl resources SL 18 1 social jb1 joball coball 9 population20 population2 Population populations 2 20 0 livestock use AUM auma acma21 ACMa 21 management cost to permittees permit tees esthetics22 Esthetics 22 recreation rde rd2 rdl3 3 geology and seismicityl5 selsmlcltyli net economic benefits 1000 powe power r generated MW future without condition 21 sixth W vaten water vacen ter flow through 3 fifth water pumped storage sixth water pumped storage 1964 DPR no power 52184 12184 2321 2353 2321 683 2066 775 2048 837 1337 io yo 93 93500 500 545 1021 546 855 19 93500 280 411 297 327 204 71995 45 50 10 24 17 17556 150 221 99 131 33 51 51425 425 59 213 169 292 34 2365 14 14 14 12 8 110 2 1 1 14 3 NA 4000 4443 2455 3748 612 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1217 17 8 to 3 4 to 2 8 to 3 9 to 2 10 to 2 5 58 8 4 to 0 4 to 0 4 to 0 4 to 0 8 to 0 5 14 14 IINA 15 NA NA A 1216 12 16 NA NA NA 915 9 15 1317 13 17 915 9 15 NA NA NA NA NA NA 915 9 15 NA NA 811 8 11 NA 811 8 11 811 8 11 NA NA 710 7 10 NA 711 7 11 710 7 10 NA no NA 1 7816 17816 NA NA NA existing 0 1425 86 NA NA reservoirs 4 NA 0 23 NA 26 NA 5438 27 NA NA 311 NA NA NA 0 518 55 NA N NA 4 NA 0 23 NA 26 NA 24 27 NA NA 0 NA NA NA 50 0 38 NA NA NA NA NA 100 NA 0 NA 0 0 NA 0 NA 0 0 NA 0 0 0 0 0 0 NA 11520 33285 22230 10580 5230 NA 1900 3850 3430 1750 865 12115 570 1050 550 820 110 51000 24000 26000 20000 14000 0 0 25411 22135 25411 29240 19525 460895 60400 100400 60400 m 14 60400 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21700 140100 51700 17600 0 0 1662 166.2 1182.4 11824 422.6 4226 6226 133.5 1335 0 represent changes the future where is not quantified impacts shown are absolute values 1 1 conditions expected in the future without additional federal development of the bonneville unit 3 recommended plan 4 biomass values are applicable to wild trout only ta 5 t1 existing conditions hj A zero indicates no change TJ all temporarily disturbed landscape would be rehabilitated to the extent practical 61 habitat units is a combined measure of quantity and quality of habitat 9 7 1 not affected by any project alternative 1 10 61 the values given for the fifth water pumped storage sixth water flow through and sixth water pumped storage alternatives are for diamond fork immediately below monks hollow reservoir the values given for the 1964 DPR alternative are for sixth water creek immediately below sixth water reservoir and diamond fork below three forks F for the no power alternative the values given are at syar tunnel outlet in addition the values given apply to both conditions of water withdrawal from the enlarged strawberry reservoir II 11 change from average monthly temperature in august i 12 2 average august temperature 173 137 average of spot measure neasure measurements measureme ments meats its taken throughout the year ea e4 14 A significant reduction in turbidity and sediment transport would result because project reservoirs would act as sediment traps and existing irrigation flows would be placed in a closed system and would no longer carry a large historical sediment load 15 15 A slightly adverse impact over existing conditions would result from high surging flows in diamond fork between dyne powerplant Power plant and hayes reservoir 16 16 temperature ranges given are maxim maximum predicted to occur when cold water is withdrawn from the enlarged strawberry reservoir when warm wam waa water is withdrawn expected temperature ranges would be 16 to 20 C for each reservoir under each alt ait alternative ative active maximum in august 17 first number represents water fluctuation under projected initial operating conditions whereas number in parentheses represents fluctuation under maximum conditions 18 based on surveys covering 90 percent of the project area 19 total number of direct and indirect jobs from project construction YO 20 population influx during peak construction year H 21 animal unit months 22 numerical ratings prepared by the forest service for a relative comparison of effects 237 recreation days net annual use and increase expected in 1992 i 247 4 A net loss of developed recreation use and an unidentifiable net loss of disbursed recreation use would result with this alternative lurtie further r surveys would be required to ide identify tify tiby specific disbursed recreation losses 25 available data indicate that with current reclamation design and construction practices the proposed features may be safely built and operated 97 |
| Identifier | http://cdm15999.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/WesternWatersProject/id/4347 |
