Record Details
page 3-79
Digital Collections at BYU
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Title | page 3-79 Final environmental impact statement on the Wasatch County Water Efficiency Project and Daniel Replacement Project, page 3-79 |
| Coverage | Electronic reproduction; |
| Format | 3-79 text/PDF |
| Rights | Brigham Young University; http://lib.byu.edu/about/copyright/generic.php Public Domain Public |
| Language | English; eng; en |
| Relation | Central Utah Project; Western Waters Digital Library; 17.2 172 172 the comment has correctly stated a portion of the basic premise for operation of the proposed action water conserved by the proposed action would be stored in jordanelle Jor danelle reservoir for later release however the source of the DIC water supply after diversions from the upper strawberry river basin are discontinued would be water conserved from the CUP agricultural supply of the heber valley non CUP water conserved by the proposed action would not be used to supply water to DIC the errata summary includes changes to section 16.1 161 igi on page W 19 1 9 that are intended to clarify this issue the errata summary also includes changes to section 3263.1 32631 32631 table 310 3 10 to provide additional information regarding the types and amounts of water that would be conserved by the proposed action impacts on water users downstream of deer creek reservoir would be avoided by the release of conserved water from jordanelle Jor danelle reservoir and by reducing the quantity of water lost from heber valley return flows the reduction in water lost from heber valley return flows is explained in the errata summary for section 3263.1 32631 32631 on page W 328 3 28 of the draft EIS 17.3 173 173 the supply of water to replace discontinued transbasin trans basin diversions to DIC would come from water conserved from the CUP agricultural supply of the heber valley the supply would not come from conserved non CUP water therefore this water supply would not constitute a new appropriation of water and would not require an appropriation application to the utah state engineer there would be no net change in the delivery of CUP water and a decrease in the consumption of non CUP water and therefore no new appropriation of water is needed there would be no increase in acreage irrigated with non CUP water from the provo river since the replacement water to DIC would be coming from water conserved from the CUP supply please see the errata summary for changes to section 16.1 161 igi on page W 19 1 9 379 3 79 |
| Identifier | http://cdm15999.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/WesternWatersProject/id/4312 |
