Record Details
page 3-48
Digital Collections at BYU
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Title | page 3-48 Final environmental impact statement on the Wasatch County Water Efficiency Project and Daniel Replacement Project, page 3-48 |
| Coverage | Electronic reproduction; |
| Format | 3-48 text/PDF |
| Rights | Brigham Young University; http://lib.byu.edu/about/copyright/generic.php Public Domain Public |
| Language | English; eng; en |
| Relation | Central Utah Project; Western Waters Digital Library; comment letter no 13 page W S 2 13.11 1311 I 1 13.12 1312 page W S 3 page W S 3 13.13 1313 page W I 1 12 2 .2 13.14 1314 I 1 13.15 1315 I 1 page W 12 1 2 13.16 1316 I 1 page W 12 1 2 page W 14 1 4 13.17 1317 I 1 pago page W 14 13.18 1318 ipagewm 13.19 1319 page W 14 1 4 page W 14 1 4 13.20 1320 I 1 page W 14 13.21 1321 ipagewm i page 3 of 5 3 section S sl23 Sl 123 12.3 123 23 PL 102575 102 575 stipulates construction of ofapipeline ofa a pipeline from jordanelle Jor danelle reservoir to the existing DIC water storage facilities section 303ax3xa 303a3a the location of the proposed pipeline in this alternative does not appear to meet this requirement section s2 sa s21 1 can project water be used in the DIC service area section s2 sa s21 1 if the conversion to sprinkler systems is not part of the proposed action is not required and is dependent upon another agency for funding and implementation it is i inappropriate to assume that CUP agricultural water availability would not change section 121 12.1 lai the aquatic mitigation plan compensated for adult trout habitat lost due to construction of the strawberry aqueduct and collection system spawning was not addressed section 121 12 121 12.1 1 the aquatic mitigation plan was intended to mitigate the effects of the strawberry aqueduct and collection system rather than inundation associated the enlargement of strawben strawden strawberry y reservoir as implied here section 122 12.2 122 if two of the three proposed alternatives do not meet the first two project purposes listed a ordering reordering re of the me project purposes should be considered section 13.2 132 132 PL 102575 102 575 stipulates construction of ofapipeline ofa a pipeline from jordanelle Jor danelle reservoir to the existing DIC water storage stomge stodge facilities section 303a3xa the ne location of the proposed pipeline in this altema alternative tive does not appear to meet this requirement section 132. 132 if the conversion to sprinkler systems is not pan part parn pann of the proposed action is not required and is dependent upon another agency for funding and implementation it is inappropriate to assume that CUP agricultural water availability would not change section 132 13.2 1.3 13 132 13 2 who will pay the pumping cost sections 13.3 133 133 and 13.4 134 134 two of the altema alternatives tives that are included in this mis mls document do not meet meethalfofme half of the defined project purposes many of the projects listed in this section meet more of the defined project purposes than do those alternatives still under consideration it thus appears that some other criteria was used for the elimination of these alternatives than that stated in mis this mls paragraph the ile tle discussion of the proposed action in section 13.2 132 132 refers to map al A l 1 for the location of the major physical features of the proposed action the provo river downstream from deer creek dam is identified as in the project area however we could not find any physical feature of the proposed action described on this page that is located there mere 348 3 48 |
| Identifier | http://cdm15999.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/WesternWatersProject/id/3611 |
