Record Details

Economic–Engineering Method for Assessing Trade-Offs between Instream and Offstream Uses

DigitalCommons@USU

Field Value
Title Economic–Engineering Method for Assessing Trade-Offs between Instream and Offstream Uses
Creator Génova, Paulina Null, Sarah E. Olivares, Marcelo A.
Description Rivers provide multiple water uses and services, including offstream uses that are valued economically and instream uses, such as recreation and ecosystem preservation, that are rarely valued economically. In many countries, water rights allocate water to offstream uses, and dedicated minimum instream flows are the main instrument for instream water allocation. However, minimum instream flows do not ensure continuous reaches for recreation or aquatic habitats. An efficient allocation of water...
Date 2019-03-01T08:00:00Z
Type text
Identifier https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/wats_facpub/1097 info:doi/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001026 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001026
Rights Copyright for this work is held by the author. Transmission or reproduction of materials protected by copyright beyond that allowed by fair use requires the written permission of the copyright owners. Works not in the public domain cannot be commercially exploited without permission of the copyright owner. Responsibility for any use rests exclusively with the user. For more information contact the Institutional Repository Librarian at digitalcommons@usu.edu.
Source Watershed Sciences Faculty Publications
Publisher Hosted by Utah State University Libraries
Contributor American Society of Civil Engineers
Subject water rights pricing rivers and streams economic factors instream flow aquatic habitats water-based recreation water conservation Civil and Environmental Engineering

© Western Waters Digital Library - GWLA member projects - Designed by the J. Willard Marriott Library - Hosted by Oregon State University Libraries and Press