Record Details

Comparing methods of measuring sea-ice density in the East Antarctic

ScholarsArchive at Oregon State University

Field Value
Title Comparing methods of measuring sea-ice density in the East Antarctic
Names Hutchings, Jennifer K. (creator)
Heil, Petra (creator)
Lecomte, Oliver (creator)
Stevens, Roger (creator)
Steer, Adam (creator)
Lieser, Jan L. (creator)
Date Issued 2015 (iso8601)
Note This is the publisher’s final pdf. The published article is copyrighted by International Glaciological Society and can be found at: http://www.igsoc.org/annals/56/69/
Abstract Remotely sensed derivation of sea-ice thickness requires sea·ice density. Sea-ice density
was estimated with three techniques during the second Sea Ice Physics and Ecosystem eXperiment
(SIPEX-II, September-November 2012, East Antarctica). The sea ice was first-year highly deformed,
mean thickness 1.2 m with layers, consistent with rafting, and 6-7/10 columnar ice and 3/10 granular
ice. Ice density was found to be lower than values (900-920 kg m⁻³ used previously to derive ice
thickness, with columnar ice mean density of 870 kg m⁻³. At two different ice stations the mean density of the ice was 870 and 800 kg m⁻³, the lower density reflecting a high percentage of porous granular ice at the second station. Error estimates for mass/volume and liquid/solid water methods are presented. With 0.1 m long, 0.1 m core samples, the error on individual density estimates is 28 kg m⁻³. Errors are larger for smaller machined blocks. Errors increase to 46 kg m⁻³ if the liquid/solid volume method is used. The mass/volume method has a low bias due to brine drainage of at least 5%. Bulk densities estimated from ice and snow measurements along 100 m transects were high, and likely unrealistic as the assumption of isostatic balance is not suitable over these length scales in deformed ice.
Genre Article
Topic sea ice
Identifier Hutchings, J. K., Heil, P., Lecomte, O., Stevens, R., Steer, A., & Lieser, J. L. (2015). Comparing methods of measuring sea-ice density in the East Antarctic. Annals of Glaciology, 56(69), 77-82. doi:10.3189/2015AoG69A814

© Western Waters Digital Library - GWLA member projects - Designed by the J. Willard Marriott Library - Hosted by Oregon State University Libraries and Press