Record Details
Cruise ship disturbance to Kittlitz's murrelets (Brachyramphus brevirostris) in Glacier Bay National Park and Preserve, Alaska
ScholarsArchive at Oregon State University
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Title | Cruise ship disturbance to Kittlitz's murrelets (Brachyramphus brevirostris) in Glacier Bay National Park and Preserve, Alaska |
| Names |
Marcella, Timothy K.
(creator) Roby, Daniel (advisor) |
| Date Issued | 2014-06-18 (iso8601) |
| Note | Graduation date: 2015 |
| Abstract | The Kittlitz's murrelet (Brachyramphus brevirostris), a small pursuit-diving seabird in the family Alcidae, occurs across much of coastal Alaska and parts of the Russian Far East. Glacier Bay National Park, located in Southeast Alaska, is believed to support approximately 37% of the worldwide breeding population of Kittlitz's murrelets during the summer months. Recent concern over apparent population declines in Alaska, coupled with the Park's dual mandate of resource preservation and visitation, led to this study. Cruise ships, although not the most numerous vessel type operating in Glacier Bay, have previously been identified as the vessel type eliciting the greatest disturbance response from Kittlitz's murrelets. During the murrelet breeding seasons in 2011 and 2012, my field assistants and I collected focal observations of 4,251 Brachyramphus murrelets from the bow of cruise ships traveling through Glacier Bay. Identification of murrelets to species was hampered by both the distance at which murrelets responded to the approaching ship and the type of response to the ship (diving vs. flushing). For roughly 40% of focal observations of murrelets from cruise ships, the species of murrelet (Kittlitz's murrelet or marbled murrelet [B. marmoratus]) could not be identified. Apparent habitat partitioning by the two murrelet species in Glacier Bay resulted in 79% of identified murrelets in the upper section of the Bay (Upper Bay) being Kittlitz's murrelets, while 83% of identified murrelets in the lower section of the Bay (Lower Bay) were marbled murrelets. In the Upper Bay, cruise ships are predicted to disturb 61% of all murrelets within 850 m on either side of the cruise ship's course (i.e., elicited a flushing or diving response), whereas in the Lower Bay, cruise ships are predicted to disturb 72% of murrelets within 850 m of the ship's course. Using Cox multistate models, I demonstrated that murrelets in the Upper Bay (predominantly Kittlitz's murrelets) were more likely to dive than flush in response to approaching cruise ships, whereas murrelets in the Lower Bay (predominantly marbled murrelets) were more likely to flush than dive. Also, murrelets in the Upper Bay responded to cruise ships by flushing or diving at shorter distances from the ship compared to murrelets in the Lower Bay. Murrelets in both areas of Glacier Bay generally reacted to cruise ships at greater distances when the ship approached indirectly, presumably because of the larger profile presented by a passing ship as opposed to a directly advancing ship. Absolute distance of the cruise ship from a focal murrelet was a strong predictor of murrelet disturbance response; no other management-relevant covariates that were measured during this study (e.g., ship velocity, distance to shore, whether a cruise ship had entered the Bay earlier that day) explained a significant proportion of the variation in murrelet response. Inferences based on data collected on-board cruise ships were limited to murrelet disturbance responses that occurred within 1 km of the ship. This was because of limits to the distance from the ship at which behavioral responses could be observed and the a priori assumption that disturbance to murrelets by cruise ships was unlikely at distances greater than 1 km. Results from shipboard observations indicated that some proportion of murrelets encountered at the farthest distance we could make inferences were on occasion disturbed (point estimate at 850 m perpendicular distance from ship's course = 15-30% probability of flushing or diving). This suggests that disturbance of murrelets by cruise ships in Glacier Bay exceeded expected distance thresholds. In order to investigate the effects of cruise ships on murrelet behavior at distances greater than 1 km, my assistants and I collected a total of 643 focal observations of Kittlitz's murrelets during 181 hours of observation from land-based observation sites in the Upper Bay during the 2012 field season. By combining these data with AIS and GPS ship tracks, I was able to append distance to the nearest cruise ship to each focal murrelet observation and search for patterns in murrelet behavior. By collecting data in this manner, I was able to avoid biasing the study based on pre-conceived notions of what constituted a threshold distance for cruise ships to disturb Kittlitz's murrelets. Using a segmented regression model within a logistic regression framework, I found that Kittlitz's murrelets exhibited a disturbance threshold (defined as an increased incidence of flushing from the water) by cruise ships at distances of at least 1.6 km, and perhaps as great as 6.0 km, with a best estimate of threshold disturbance distance at 3.8 km from a cruise ship. When cruise ships were greater than 3.8 km from focal Kittlitz's murrelets, the baseline probability of murrelets flushing during a focal observation period was 12.5%. When cruise ships were less than 3.8 km from focal Kittlitz's murrelets, the probability of flushing increased logistically with decreasing distance to an estimated 48% for the closest approach distances. The unexpectedly long distances at which murrelet behavior was affected by cruise ships in Glacier Bay is most likely attributable to social facilitation by other disturbed murrelets, because similar numbers of murrelets flushed when cruise ships were approaching (n = 30) as when they were receding (n = 27). Once a Kittlitz's murrelet flushed from the water, the subsequent duration of flight did not vary with distance to the nearest cruise ship. Instead, the duration of Kittlitz's murrelet flight was associated with time of day. The strong association between the proximity of cruise ships and the probability of a murrelet flushing, even at distances of several kilometers, demonstrates that Kittlitz's murrelets in Glacier Bay are susceptible to disturbance from cruise ships at distances greater than has previously been published for any seabird. |
| Genre | Thesis/Dissertation |
| Access Condition | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/ |
| Topic | Kittlitz's |
| Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/1957/50304 |
