Record Details
Policies and practices of L.G.B.T. friendly institutions to support students who are attracted to more than one gender.
ScholarsArchive at Oregon State University
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Title | Policies and practices of L.G.B.T. friendly institutions to support students who are attracted to more than one gender. |
| Names |
Zissen, Donald J.
(creator) White, Jessica E. (advisor) |
| Date Issued | 2014-04-25 (iso8601) |
| Note | Graduation date: 2014 |
| Abstract | Within the United States, the number of "out" Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual (LGB) individuals attending a college or university is on the rise (Rosario, Schrimshaw, Hunter & Braun, 2006). With this increase, the new and/or different ways that lesbian and gay individuals can present and express their sexual orientation has also risen. For example, many college students now identify as pansexual, sapiosexual, and other identities that are not bound within the gender binary and preconceived sexual orientations. These individuals often experience marginalization, not only from the heterosexual majority, but from their homosexual counterparts as well. Forms of institutionalized support for lesbian and gay students have also continued to rise, but evidence of support for emergent LGB identities is not as evident in the literature (Fine, 2012; Sanlo, 2000). This study examined U.S. colleges and universities that have been identified as leaders in the LGB student support field and investigated how they develop policy and provide services and support for those individuals who identify on the LGB spectrum, but not as lesbian or gay. The research questions that framed this research were as follows: (a) What policies have the administrations at these institutions enacted to support students who are attracted to more than one gender? (b) What practices have the administrations at these institutions employed to support students who are attracted to more than one gender? and (c) How do the physical, aggregate, organizational, and constructed dimensions of involvement impact the ways in which institutions are able to support students who are attracted to more than one gender? This research used a case-study tradition with the researcher gathering data from eight US colleges/universities via interviews with institutional professionals and examination of existing institutional documents such as the website, meeting agendas and minutes. Three key findings emerged. First, inclusive LGB programming is favored by university programs serving the LGB population over targeted programming for students who are attracted to more than one gender. Second, generalizable LGBT policies are chosen more often than policies designed for specific identities. Finally, physical location of institutions, layout and flexibility of LGBT centers, availability and visibility of professional staff members, and the ability for a student to become involved with institution/LGBT center are important components to supporting individuals who are attracted to more than one gender. In considering these findings, the researcher offers three main implications. First, assessment of programs and policies designed to support individuals who are attracted to more than one gender should occur on a regular basis. Second, institutions may want to examine the language used within programs and policies to ensure that constituents are truly represented. Third, practitioners may want to use a critical eye when developing programming to ensure that it is supported by institutional policy. If such programming is not motivated by policy, then practitioners should be able to show a need for the programming thereby providing insight into possible gaps in student support. |
| Genre | Thesis/Dissertation |
| Access Condition | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/ |
| Topic | LGB student support |
| Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/1957/49511 |
