Record Details

A comparison of in vivo and in vitro techniques for the evaluation of varying roughage-concentrate rations

ScholarsArchive at Oregon State University

Field Value
Title A comparison of in vivo and in vitro techniques for the evaluation of varying roughage-concentrate rations
Names Klett, Ramon Hollis (creator)
Ralston, A. T. (advisor)
Date Issued 1966-04-28 (iso8601)
Note Graduation date: 1966
Abstract The objective of this study was to compare the total collection
(in vivo), nylon bag, and in vitro digestibility techniques under
standardized conditions. Twin steers were used simultaneously to
measure the digestibility of five rations consisting of the following
ratios of alfalfa hay to steamed roller barley: 4:0 (I), 3:1 (II),
2:2 (III), 1:3 (IV), and 0:4 (V). One trial was completed in the
in vivo study using a six day collection period, whereas two trials
were run for each of the other two techniques. Fermentation periods
of 24, 48, and 72 hours or 12 and 24 hours were used for the nylon
bag and in vitro studies, respectively.
In vivo energy, crude protein, ether extract, and dry matter
digestibility and TDN increased as the roughage: concentrate decreased
from 4:0 to 0:4. The inverse relationship was noted for
cellulose and crude fiber digestibility.
The variability in dry matter digestibility, as measured by
standard deviations and coefficients of variation, was highest in
the nylon bag and lowest in the in vivo procedure. The difference
between trials, using dry matter digestibility as the criterion, was
generally non-significant for both the nylon bag and in vitro techniques.
It was concluded that repeatability between trials is not a
factor when using these techniques if sufficient replications are
used.
Differences between animals within rations were greater than
expected; however, when the data were pooled across all rations,
the steers were not significantly different.
The rate and variability of nylon bag and in vitro dry matter
and cellulose digestion was greatest in the first digestion period in
each of the five rations. However, as the rations included concentrates,
the rate of nylon bag dry matter and cellulose digestion
decreased in the same period.
A comparison of the three techniques,using the mean dry
matter and cellulose digestion coefficients,showed the in vivo dry
matter digestion to compare closely with the 48 hour nylon bag
and 24 hour in vitro digestion. The nylon bag and in vitro cellulose
digestibility underestimated the in vivo digestion of cellulose.
The nylon bag dry matter digestibility at 48 and 72 hour
fermentation periods and in vitro dry matter digestibility at 12 and 24 hours was significantly correlated with the in vivo digestibility
of ether extract, energy, dry matter, cellulose, and crude fiber.
Similar correlations were obtained when nylon bag and in vitro
cellulose digestion was correlated with in vivo digestibility of the
chemical components. Correlation coefficients between the nylon
bag and in vitro techniques, using dry matter and cellulose digestion
as criteria, showed a close relationship at the longer digestion
periods. Regression equations developed from these correlations
showed no significant (P < .01) difference between the predicted and
actual in vivo dry matter digestibility of eight substrates when using
equations developed from the nylon bag and in vitro dry matter
digestibility in this study.
The effect of inoculum source on substrate digestion was
studied using the in vitro technique. The data showed that all-roughage and all-concentrate substrates are digested more completely
with inoculum from animals maintained on the same diet.
However, when measuring the digestibility of a mixed substrate
(roughage and concentrate), the most accurate results, as measured
by a standard, were obtained when using an inoculum from donor
animals maintained on a mixed diet, regardless of the proportion
of roughage and concentrates.
Genre Thesis/Dissertation
Topic Digestion
Identifier http://hdl.handle.net/1957/47596

© Western Waters Digital Library - GWLA member projects - Designed by the J. Willard Marriott Library - Hosted by Oregon State University Libraries and Press