Record Details

Energy-protein relationships in high-fat rations for growing-finishing swine

ScholarsArchive at Oregon State University

Field Value
Title Energy-protein relationships in high-fat rations for growing-finishing swine
Names Pate, Findlay Moye (creator)
Oldfield, J. E. (advisor)
Date Issued 1967-07-24 (iso8601)
Note Graduation date: 1968
Abstract An experiment was conducted with 48 Yorkshire x Berkshire
crossbred barrows to evaluate the influence of varying Calorie: protein ratios in high-fat rations on performance and carcass quality
of growing-finishing swine. Pigs were individually fed rations containing
three levels of fat (lard): 0, 15 and 30 percent. Each fat
level was incorporated into rations differing by Calorie: protein
ratio (Kcal. digestible energy per gram of crude protein). Two
ratios were employed, based on (1) a ration containing 1500 Kcal.
of digestible energy and 14 percent crude protein, approximately
that commonly used in swine grower diets, and (2) a ration containing
a similar energy level as (1) , with the crude protein level
raised to 20 percent. Responses were obtained over two growth
periods (60-130 and 130-200 pounds live weight). Animals were
slaughtered after exceeding a weight of 200 pounds and carcass data were collected.
Pigs consuming the higher protein diets exhibited a significantly
poorer average daily gain (P < .01) and were less efficient in dry
matter utilization (P < .05). Further evidences of the lower nutritive
value of the higher protein diets were: an apparent reduction in
daily intakes of digestible energy and dry-matter, and a significantly
(P < .01) larger quantity of calculated digestible energy consumed per
pound of gain. The poorer performance noted with the higher protein
diets tended to become more pronounced with increasing levels
of fat.
Inclusion of increasing quantities of fat significantly (P < .01)
improved both average daily gain and dry matter utilization. Considering
the mean results from the two ratios used, average daily
gain was increased by 7.5 and 18.4 percent and dry matter conversion
by 21.3 and 45.0 percent with the addition of 15 and 30 percent
fat, respectively. Further, additional fat resulted in significantly
(P < .01) greater daily intakes of calculated digestible energy and
crude protein. Calculated digestible energy consumption per pound
of gain as an indication of energy utilization was not altered by varying
fat levels.
The effects of energy:protein ratio and fat supplementation on
pig performance were comparable over the two growth periods
studied. Statistically, the addition of fat to rations of older pigs was found to be more beneficial (P < .01) in relation to dry matter
conversion than with younger animals. However, there was no indication
that this interaction between growth stage and fat level existed
with regard to calculated digestible energy consumed per pound of
gain. This finding, along with the main effects of added fat on dry
matter and calculated digestible energy consumption per pound of
gain, showed that efficiency of gain would be more representative if
reported in terms of energy utilization in studies concerned with
varying caloric density.
Additional fat brought about a definite trend toward increased
carcass fatness. With increasing fat levels there was a significant,
(P < .01) linear increase in backfat thickness and an apparent reduction
in loin eye area. Increasing the quantity of dietary protein in
relation to the energy content of the diet was ineffective in improving
carcass desirability. Pigs fed the low-fat, high-protein ration had
0.28 inches more backfat (P < .05) and 0.49 square inches less loin
eye area than comparable animals on the low-fat, low-protein ration.
However, at the higher fat levels there was no indication of poorer
carcass quality being associated with higher protein intake.
Genre Thesis/Dissertation
Topic Swine -- Feeding and feeds
Identifier http://hdl.handle.net/1957/46990

© Western Waters Digital Library - GWLA member projects - Designed by the J. Willard Marriott Library - Hosted by Oregon State University Libraries and Press