Record Details

Comparing statistical techniques to classify the structure of mountain forest stands using CHM-derived metrics in Trento province (Italy)

ScholarsArchive at Oregon State University

Field Value
Title Comparing statistical techniques to classify the structure of mountain forest stands using CHM-derived metrics in Trento province (Italy)
Names Torresan, Chiara L. (creator)
Strunk, Jacob (creator)
Zald, Harold S. J. (creator)
Zhiqiang, Yang (creator)
Cohen, Warren B. (creator)
Date Issued 2014 (iso8601)
Note To the best of our knowledge, one or more authors of this paper were federal employees when contributing to this work. This is the publisher’s final pdf. The published article is copyrighted by the author(s) and published by the Associazione Italiana di Telerilevamento. The published article can be found at: http://www.aitjournal.com/.
Abstract In some cases a canopy height model (CHM) is the only available source of forest height information. For these cases it is important to understand the predictive power of CHM data for forest attributes. In this study we examined the use of lidar-derived CHM metrics to predict forest structure classes according to the amount of basal area present in understory, midstory, and overstory trees. We evaluated two approaches to predict size-based forest classifications: in the first, we attempted supervised classification with both linear discriminant analysis (LDA) and random forest (RF); in the second, we predicted basal areas of lower, mid, and upper canopy trees from CHM-derived variables by k-nearest neighbour imputation (k-NN) and parametric regression, and then classified observations based on their predicted basal areas. We used leave-one-out cross-validation to evaluate our ability to predict forest structure classes from CHM data and in the case of prediction-based classification approach we look at the performances in predicting basal area. The strategies proved moderately successful with a best overall classification accuracy of 41% in the case of LDA. In general, we were most successful in predicting the basal areas of small and large trees (R² respectively of 71% and 69% in the case of k-NN imputation).
Genre Article
Access Condition http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/
Topic forest structure
Identifier Torresan, C. L., Strunk, J., Zald, H. S. J., Zhiqiang, Y., & Cohen, W. B. (2014). Comparing statistical techniques to classify the structure of mountain forest stands using CHM-derived metrics in Trento province (Italy). European Journal of Remote Sensing, 47, 75-94. doi:10.5721/EuJRS20144706

© Western Waters Digital Library - GWLA member projects - Designed by the J. Willard Marriott Library - Hosted by Oregon State University Libraries and Press