Record Details
New Venture Teams: A Review of the Literature and Roadmap for Future Research
ScholarsArchive at Oregon State University
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Title | New Venture Teams: A Review of the Literature and Roadmap for Future Research |
| Names |
Klotz, Anthony C.
(creator) Hmieleski, Keith M. (creator) Bradley, Bret H. (creator) Busenitz, Lowell W. (creator) |
| Date Issued | 2014-01 (iso8601) |
| Note | This is an author's peer-reviewed final manuscript, as accepted by the publisher. The published article is copyrighted by Sage and can be found at: http://jom.sagepub.com/. |
| Abstract | As entrepreneurship research has matured, scholars have increasingly recognized that the formation of new ventures is commonly accomplished by teams as opposed to lone entrepreneurs. Over the past two decades, the upper echelons perspective has served as the primary lens for investigating new venture team functioning and performance. However, researchers have begun to move beyond the relationship between team characteristics and team outcomes, to explore intermediary mechanisms that more precisely explain how team inputs lead to team effectiveness. In this article we apply an inputs-mediators-outcomes framework, which has served as a foundation for teams research in organizational behavior over the past 50 years, to first organize and review prior work on new venture teams, and then to provide a roadmap for future research. By integrating the upper echelons approach from strategic management with the inputs-mediators-outcomes framework from organizational behavior, we clarify what is known about new venture teams and shed light on important issues that could help the field of entrepreneurship to develop a more comprehensive understanding of why some new venture teams, but not others, achieve successful outcomes. |
| Genre | Article |
| Topic | new venture teams |
| Identifier | Klotz, A. C., Hmieleski, K. M., Bradley, B. H., & Busenitz, L. W. (2014). New venture teams: A review of the literature and roadmap for future research. Journal of Management, 40(1), 226-255. doi:10.1177/0149206313493325 |
