Record Details
Effects of routine handling and tagging procedures on physiological stress responses in juvenile chinook salmon
ScholarsArchive at Oregon State University
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Title | Effects of routine handling and tagging procedures on physiological stress responses in juvenile chinook salmon |
| Names |
Sharpe, Cameron S.
(creator) Thompson, Daniel A. (creator) Blankenship, H. Lee (creator) Schreck, Carl B. (creator) |
| Date Issued | 1998-04 (iso8601) |
| Abstract | Juvenile chinook salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha were subjected to handling and tagging protocols typical of normal hatchery operations and monitored for their physiological response to stress. Treatments included coded-wire-tagging, counting, ventral fin clipping, adipose fin clipping, and a procedure simulating a pond split. Treatment fish were also subjected to a standardized stress challenge (1 h confinement) to evaluate their ability to deal with disturbances subsequent to a handling or tagging procedure. Circulating levels of cortisol and glucose were used as indicators of stress. Each of the treatments elicited very similar responses among treatment groups. Cortisol increased from resting levels of about 20 ng/mL to about 90 ng/mL by 1 h poststress and returned to near resting levels by 8 h poststress. Glucose levels increased from 50 mg/dL to about 80 mg/dL by 1 h poststress and remained elevated for much of the experiment. The cortisol and glucose responses to the confinement stress did not differ over time or among treatments. However, the confinement stress results do suggest a small but significant cumulative response, indicating small residual effects of the original handling protocols. No deaths were noted among treatment groups. |
| Genre | Article |
| Topic | juvenile chinook salmon |
| Identifier | Sharpe, C. S., Thompson, D. A., Blankenship, H. L., & Schreck, C. B. (1998). Effects of routine handling and tagging procedures on physiological stress responses in juvenile chinook salmon. The Progressive Fish-Culturist, 60(2), 81-87. |
