Record Details
Field | Value |
---|---|
Title | page 196 |
Relation | River in Common |
Date | 2005-01-12 to 2005-02-16 |
Rights | This item is in the public domain. Acknowledgement of the University of Oregon Libraries as a source is requested. |
Type | page |
Format | Scanned from originals using Silverfast AI 6.0 on UMAX Powerlook III flatbed scanner. Scanned images saved as 16 bit grayscale tiffs. 201.271 kb 8 bit - Gray Gamma 2.2 - greyscale Omnipage 14 used to OCR 8 bit grayscale tiffs and generate text files for full text access. 16 bit grayscale tiffs edited in Photoshop 6.0: cropped, rotated, reduced in size, levels adjusted, bit depth reduced to 8 and JPEGs created. |
Description | The Columbia has joined this debate more than once. Up to this time, the course of the river governance debate has gone through three phases. Early proposals for comprehensive authority, and the reality of ad hoc management. The early debates over river governance, the Columbia Valley Authority debate and the Columbia River Compact negotiations, were focused on controlling river development, and both ended in stalemate. In place of integrated river government, the river was simply... |
Identifier | http://oregondigital.org/u?/wwdl,1427 |