Results
1 - 25 of 715 Items 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >>
1 - 25 of 715 Items 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >>
|
March 5, 1949
Senator A. V. Watklns Senator for Utah Senate Office Building Washington, D. C.
Dear Senator Watklnsi
I have carefully considered the amendments proposed by Senator Knowland and from a strictly legal point of view, I am firmly of the...
2009-02-01
|
|
Document: 88th Congress, 1st Session, Senate, Document No. 20, Determination of the Rights of the States of the Lower Colorado River Basin to Waters of the Main Stream of the Colorado River, Opinion of the United States Supreme Court in the Case...
1963-06-04
|
|
provision in every contract he drafts for certain parties? jet, it seems to me to do so by such a provision In this Compact is just as absurd.
Hew, inasmuch as I have said that all these amendments are legally unnecessary and do not and cannot...
2009-02-01
|
|
COLORADO RIVER STORAGE PROJECT 7: below Lee Ferry, and also all parts of said States located without the drainage area of the Colorado River system which are now or shall hereafter be beneficially served by waters diverted from the system below...
2008-11-01
|
|
Group of men witnessing Colorado Governor Morley sign the Colorado River Compact and South Platte River Compact bills
2024-04-26
2016-03-22 2016-03-22 |
|
18
ARIZONA v. CALIFORNIA.
lion four hundred thousand acre-feet of the waters apportioned to the lower basin States by paragraph (a) of Article III of the Colorado River compact, plus not more than one-half of any excess or surplus waters...
|
|
2 COLORADO RIVER STORAGE PROJECT ment of the water resources apportioned to the Upper Basin and that the specific authorizations in this bill are not intended to limit or preclude the consideration and authorization by Congress of other projects...
2008-11-01
|
|
Packet of documents: "Memorandum on the Colorado River Compact Signed by Colorado River Commission at Santa Fe, N. Mex. November 24, 1922," statements by Herbert Hoover and Arthur Davis, resolution on flood control for California and Arizona, a...
2024-04-26
2017-07-12 2017-07-12 |
|
Report:United States Department of Interior, Stewart L. Udall, Secretary, Bureau of Reclamation, Floyd E. Dominy, "Pacific Southwest Water Plan", Views and Recommendations of Affected States and Federal Agencies on August 1963 Report, Response...
1964-01-01
|
|
Laws governing.
43 USC 371 not. Repatment contracts.
43 USC 485a.
53 Stat. 1194, 1195.
25 USC 386a. Restriction.
63 Stat. 1051, 7 USC 1441 note.
52 State. 41. 7 USC 1281.
SEC. 4. Except as otherwise provided in this Act, in constructing,...
|
|
5
ARIZONA v. CALIFORNIA.
years," instead of to the language of the Project Act. The result is the Court's, not that of Congress, whose intent we have been called upon to discover and effectuate. The congressional intent is expressed in § 4...
|
|
Document: A Bill, February 3, 1967 (photocopy), page 12
1967-02-03
|
|
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE This is the language to which I desire particularly to refer: In the event of the failure of the Secretary of the Interior to so comply, any State of the Colorado River Basin may maintain an action in the Supreme...
2008-11-01
|
|
Document: A Bill, February 3, 1967 (photocopy), page 11
1967-02-03
|
|
Report:United States Department of Interior, Stewart L. Udall, Secretary, Bureau of Reclamation, Floyd E. Dominy, "Pacific Southwest Water Plan", Views and Recommendations of Affected States and Federal Agencies on August 1963 Report, Response...
1964-01-01
|
|
Honorable Stewart L. Udall,
Page two
November 27, 1963
heartily concur with this concept of resource development. How ever, it is our unalterable position, for the mutual protection of all Colorado River Basin states, that any and all projects...
|
|
Memorandum by Delph Carpenter providing a narrative of the attempt to find a six-state plan for the Colorado River Compact after Arizona's failure to ratify the original compact in 1922, including a draft of the six-state plan
2017-07-12 2017-07-12 |
|
10
ARIZONA v. CALIFORNIA.
result by misreading the Colorado River Compact, the Project Act, and by misreading the legislative history leading up to the California Limitation Act. An analysis of the legislative history will show, as already...
|
|
This Utah Foundation Research Report number 647 (February 2002) is part one of two that Utah Foundation will produce in order to give the public and policy makers a clearer understanding of water issues in Utah as they pertain to taxation, pricing...
|
|
Report:United States Department of Interior, Stewart L. Udall, Secretary, Bureau of Reclamation, Floyd E. Dominy, "Pacific Southwest Water Plan", Views and Recommendations of Affected States and Federal Agencies on August 1963 Report, Response...
1964-01-01
|
|
Document: 89th Congress, 2D Session, H.R. 4671, Recommended Revision, April 25, 1966, page 55
1966-04-25
|
|
Document: 88th Congress, 2d Session, Senate Calendar No. 1267, The Lower Colorado River Basin Project, Report No. 1330, Agust 6, 1964, page 25
1964-08-06
|
|
The Honorable Stewart L. Udall
5
November 27, 1963
irrigation, recreation, and fish and wildlife purposes. The Bureau of Reclamation has initiated studies of these potentialities and it is my hope that these studies can be carried forward in...
|
|
"September 1991"
2007-01-02
2007-01-02 1991-04-26 |
