Browse by Archive
List of activities and projects worked on by John Wittwer in 1940-41. Report has penciled comments in several places.
2024-11-01
|
Having been unsuccessful in obtaining reliable domestic water, Bunkerville and Mesquite were beginning an all-out lobbying campaign on various agencies for help.
1936-11-01
|
Discussion of Fire Underwriters report of fire protection in Las Vegas. While the water company was not obliged to comply with its findings, their response would have a direct impact on the insurance rates for businesses.
1949-08-04
|
Report on the 1936 work on erosion-flood control projects done by the Civilian Conservation Corps for the U. S. Forest Service and the Soil Conservation Service. Project Number: State Office No. 172, Clark County No. 12
1936-11-01
|
1939 Las Vegas water consumption by month showing a daily average per month.
1939-05-01
|
Letter explaining the proposed relocation of water pipelines and powerlines off railroad land before the sale to the water district to enable future development of land. Reference to map shown below.
1952-06-03
|
The county received a preferred water rate. At Block 20, they had 12 taps, and rather than install 12 meters, they paid a flat rate. They now wanted to pay for one tap. Bettis was asking if the Las Vegas Land and Water Company could cut out the...
1910-01-09
|
Report on the results of the state engineer's test of a new well in Las Vegas.
1950-01-18
|
Rauch sees no point in charging the present rate to new industrial connections to the railroad pipelines, but does feel that they should charge a flat rate for meter installation and house connections.
1929-03-12
|
Report on the eight most pressing issues regarding flood-erosion control in 1937. Project Number: State Office #172, Clark Co. #12
1937-11-01
|
Report of the damage caused by a flood in August 11, 1941.
1941-10-14
|
Cost of Civilian Conservation Corp work in the Moapa Valley and the benefits accrued to the residents of the valley.
2024-11-01
|
Overview of the efforts throughout Clark County to increase domestic water supplies. Project Number: State Office No. 282, Clark County No. 22
1939-11-01
|
Summary of plan for organizing an irrigation district in the Moapa Valley for flood control, water storage, and drainage. Project Number: State Office # M-282, Clark County # M-22
2024-11-01
|
Robert Griffith's lawyer informed the Las Vegas Land and Water Company's lawyer that unless they withdrew their protest of the Griffith well, they would protest the water company well.
1945-05-02
|
Summary of plan for organizing an irrigation district in the Moapa Valley for flood control, water storage, and drainage. Project Number: State Office No. 172, Clark County No. 12
2024-11-01
|
Progress report with copies of relevant correspondence regarding the creation of an irrigation district in the Moapa Valley. Project Number: State Office #172, Clark County #12
1929-11-01
|
Offer from the Las Vegas Valley Water District to purchase all water production lands and facilities owned by the Union Pacific Railroad and subsidiaries
1952-08-25
|
Discussion of the progress on domestic water for Bunkerville and Mesquite, Nevada. Prospects were good for the Work Projects Administration to install a tank and pipeline. PROJECT NUMBER: State Office # M-282, Clark County # M-22
1938-11-01
|
Discussion of using Civilian Conservation Corps labor for flood control works in the Virgin River and Moapa Valleys. Project Number: State Office No. 172
1933-01-01
|
Minutes of meeting of agencies involved in the work to improve the Lower Moapa Valley flood channel.
1940-12-05
|
Report of water quality monitoring in Lake Mead
1977-09-01
|
The State Engineer recommends offering Robert Griffith water at wholesale prices so he does not want to drill a well
1945-03-03
|
Projection of what would happen to the growth of Las Vegas when the availability of water becomes the biggest limiting factor.
1992-08-01
|
On a report that the railroad was not fulfilling its duty to supply water to the Stewart burial plot, Bracken and others visited the site and reported on their findings. An excerpt from the original Stewart deed is referenced below.
1939-06-20
|